Introduction
Due to the risk of the coronavirus spread, most universities and colleges decided to switch to distance learning following the recommendation of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. During the spring semester of the 2019-2020 academic year, students were taught online due to the unfavorable epidemiological situation. In the fall of the 2020-2021 academic year, the learning process at the university was held in a mixed mode. Despite the announcement of the accelerated introduction of digital technologies in the economy and social sphere in 2018 (President of the Russian Federation, 2018), most educational organizations were not ready for the full implementation of e-learning (Bugrov & Krepets, 2020; Zueva & Vinogradova 2021). The study results show that not all disciplines were extended with online courses, most teachers did not have experience in using massive open online courses (MOOCs), and students did not have the necessary skills to successfully complete such online courses (Bekova et al., 2020; Chirikov et al., 2020; Klyagin et al., 2020; Larionova et al., 2020).
The advantages and disadvantages of the forced transition to distance learning are considered in the article (Mamchik et al., 2021). The most common challenges are as follows: the complexity of organizing the educational process and motivating students to work independently; communication with teachers; the temptation of non-independent learning. However, modern education can no longer ignore online learning. For this reason, it is vital to assess the educational results of online learning. In this regard, the question arises: how to evaluate the quality of online education? One of the possible tools for this purpose can be the assessment of the dynamics of the process. We propose to measure the progress of students on the basis of their final grades in the studied disciplines, using integral indicators, such as the average student score in all the disciplines studied and the average student score in the whole curriculum (Shukhman et al., 2021). As a result, the research has shown that the average score of students at the end of the session did not undergo significant changes due to a new format of education (Bekova et al., 2020; Shukhman et al., 2021). It has been revealed that academic performance was at a higher level in the course of distance learning, i.e. students got higher marks when assessing their knowledge (Lomovtseva, 2009; Chernykh et al., 2020; Mamchik et al., 2020). This might be connected with the form of knowledge control in the context of the availability of educational literature and the Internet (Chernykh et al., 2020). At the same time, distance learning allows students to successfully master only the theoretical part of a discipline (Pyatibrat et al., 2021).
The results of experimental studies prove that online and mixed courses ensure the same level of educational results as traditional disciplines taught at the university (Bekova et al., 2020). However, the fact that students prefer a traditional or mixed format, as well as a large number of students who have not completed courses, highlights the need to take into account the number of expulsions when assessing the effectiveness of training in general (Shcheglova et al., 2020; Shmeleva & Frumin, 2020).
At the same time, there is no understanding of the quality of education in the transition to distance learning. In addition, the effectiveness of the online format as a whole is unproven.
The research aims at studying the dynamics of expulsions of students pursuing degrees in "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" and "Information Security" from the Faculty of Information Technology depending on the format of education, as well as to determine the relationship between the number of expulsions and the student's place of residence.
The study answers the following questions: how do the dynamics of students' expulsions from the Faculty of Information Technology change depending on the format of education?; is there a relationship between the number of expulsions and the student's place of residence?
Materials and methods
The Moscow Polytechnic University teaches many professions necessary for the digital economy and industry of the Russian Federation. As part of the Development Program, the university develops curricula and trains specialists based on the needs of employers, data from the analysis and monitoring of the demand for personnel, including within the framework of the federal project "Personnel for the Digital Economy". The largest area of study at the Moscow Polytechnic University in terms of the number of students is "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" (20% of all the students). The university is increasing the number of students studying in IT areas, and their share in state-financed programs will be 35% by 2022. Due to an increasing educational interest in "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" and "Information Security" at the Moscow Polytechnic University, we select full-time students of these enlarged groups as an object for checking the relationship between the format of education, certification procedures, and students' progress.
The sampling included 4,018 students.
During the pandemic, distance learning at the Moscow Polytechnic University was organized as part of an electronic information and educational environment on the LMS Moodle platform.
The dynamics of students' progress were evaluated by comparing the number of expelled students before the transition to online education, during the period of distance learning, and when conducting classes in a mixed mode in the period 2018-2021.
Results and discussion
The total number of expelled students pursuing degrees in "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" and "Information Security" in the period from 2018 to 2021 is presented in Fig 1.
Fig 1 demonstrates that the number of students expelled in the period from 2018 to 2021 did not increase linearly. For example, 60 sophomore students pursuing a degree in "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" were expelled in 2018-2019 (23% of the total number of students in the 2nd year of the program). In the 2019-2020 academic year, 37 sophomore students were expelled (12.5% of the total number of students in the 2nd year of the program). In the 2020-2021 academic year, the number of expelled students reached 94 people (26.3%). The data shown in Fig. 1 proves that mostly freshman and sophomore students get expelled. The fact that the largest number of students drop out in the first year of their study is confirmed by the results of foreign studies (Harvey et al., 2006; Willcoxson et al., 2011; Kondratjeva et al., 2017; Zając & Komendant-Brodowska, 2018; Vilkova et al., 2021).
According to Fig 1, the number of expelled students in the field of "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" decreased and slightly increased in the field of "Information Security" during the transition to distance learning caused by quarantine measures in Moscow (the 2019-2020 academic year). After the end of the quarantine in the fall of the 2020-2021 academic year, the number of students who dropped out has almost doubled compared to the 2018-2019 academic year.
A decrease in the number of expelled students during the quarantine does not indicate an increase in their progress during the transition to distance learning since the university administration decided to postpone expulsions at the initiative of the educational organization (for academic failure or violation of the contract terms) until the quarantine was released.
For a better understanding of the dynamics of academic performance, it is necessary to study the reasons for expulsions between 2018 and 2021. Tables 1 and 2 provide the number of expelled students in absolute terms (people) and as a percentage of the total number of students in each year of the program.
Academic year | Number of students as of October 1, 2021 | Number of expelled students | AF | OR | T | Other reasons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 895 | 147 (16.4%) | 115 (12.8%) | 23 (2.5%) | 10 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
2019-2020 | 1030 | 84 (8.2%) | 41 (4.0%) | 35 (3.4%) | 7 (0.7%) | 1 (0.1%) |
2020-2021 | 1325 | 236 (17.8%) | 163 (12.3%) | 60 (4.5%) | 13 (1.0%) | 0 (0%) |
where AF is the number of expelled students because of academic failure;
OR is the number of students expelled at own request;
T is the number of expelled students since they decided to transfer to another educational institution.
The group of students is presented in accordance with the annual report under form No. VPO-1 "Information on the organization conducting educational activities in higher education programs: Bachelor's, Master's, and Specialist's degrees".
Academic year | Number of students as of October 1, 2021 | Number of expelled students | AF | OR | T | Other reasons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 243 (100%) | 18 (7.4%) | 18 (7.4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
2019-2020 | 257 (100%) | 31 (12.1%) | 18 (7%) | 12 (4.7) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0%) |
2020-2021 | 268 (100%) | 55 (20.5%) | 33 (12.3%) | 16 (6.0%) | 6 (2.2%) | 0 (0%) |
The data (Tables 1 and 2) shows that the largest number of students were expelled at their own request or for academic failure. Moreover, the number of academic dismissals from the program "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" during the quarantine decreased from 12.8 to 4%, which was primarily due to the initiative of the educational organization to create the most favorable conditions for the elimination of academic debts. The number of voluntarily expelled students steadily increased both during the quarantine and after it from 2.5 to 3.4 and 4.5%, respectively. The number of students pursuing a degree in "Information Security" and expelled at their own request increased from 0 to 16% over this period.
Based on the research (Bekova et al., 2020), we suggested that the isolation of students, including the organization of their workspace during online training, could presuppose the effectiveness of online and mixed-mode learning. One of the reasons for the expulsion of students could be living in a dormitory during the period of distance learning. In this regard, we check whether there is a relationship between the number of expulsions and the student's place of residence. To do this, we conducted a quantitative analysis of academic dismissals and voluntary expulsions with due regard to the student's region of residence. To achieve the task, all the expelled students were divided into three groups: 1) students permanently registered in Moscow; 2) Moscow Oblast; 3) constituent entities of the Russian Federation, excluding foreign citizens (Table 3).
Academic year | Expulsion for academic failure | Expulsion at own request | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moscow | Moscow Oblast | Regions | Moscow | Moscow Oblast | Regions | |
2018-2019 | 34 (3.8%) | 24 (2.7%) | 57 (6.3%) | 11 (1.2%) | 4 (0.4%) | 8 (0.9%) |
2019-2020 | 14 (1.4%) | 5 (0.5%) | 22 (2.1%) | 17 (1.7%) | 2 (0.2%) | 16 (1.5%) |
2020-2021 | 60 (4.5%) | 30 (2.3%) | 73 (5.55%) | 26 (1.9%) | 9 (0.7%) | 25 (1.9%) |
Table 3 provide data on expelled students in absolute terms and as a percentage of the total number of students in a particular field of study within the academic year as of October 2021.
The analysis of the data (Tables 3) show that the number of voluntarily withdrawn students increased among those who came to study at the university from the constituent entities of the Russian Federation from 0.9% to 1.9% in the field of "Computer Science and Computer Engineering" and from 0% to 3% in the field of "Information Security" during the quarantine and after it.
This might be conditioned by the reluctance of some students to study online (Bekova et al., 2020). Both Russian and foreign studies show that students during the quarantine had personal and financial problems, which negatively affected their desire to get an academic degree (Vilkova et al., 2021). According to the students, a decrease in motivation and the lack of feedback from teachers become the main reasons for voluntary withdrawals (Shcheglova et al., 2020). A large number of expelled freshman and sophomore students proves that students, especially junior students living in a dormitory, need to attend offline classes in order to interact with the teacher and their fellow students.
Conclusions
The analysis of expulsions demonstrated that the dropout rate of students was approximately the same before the introduction of quarantine measures, during the transition to distance learning and studying in a mixed format. In 2020-2021 academic year, a slight increase in expulsions was caused by the introduction of administrative measures to defer them during the quarantine. However, the number of students giving up studies at their own request increased during the quarantine period and after it.
We concluded that the university administration needs to monitor students at risk, develop and implement support measures, encourage interest in learning, and invest in academic services aimed at underperforming students.
We would like to thank our colleagues from the National Research University "Higher School of Economics", especially Irina Shcheglova, for their valuable comments on the article.