SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número1Bases teóricas para la fundamentación del proceso de extracción de jugo de caña de azúcar para la producción de panelaAnálisis resistivo de un nuevo arado de tracción animal mediante el Método de Elementos Finitos (MEF) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2071-0054

Resumen

HERRERA VILLAFRANCA, Magaly et al. Different Statistical Methods for the analysis of discrete variables. An application in the agricultural and technical sciences . Rev Cie Téc Agr [online]. 2012, vol.21, n.1, pp. 58-62. ISSN 2071-0054.

The objective of this article was to evaluate three different statistical methods to conduct analyses of discrete variables. The information came from an experiment developed at the Camilo Cienfuegos Genetics Enterprise in the Pinar del Río province in 2007-2008 related to the CT-115 forrage production. A complete randomized design was used with three treatments and ten repetitions. The variables analysed were: number of stems, number of sprouts, total number of leaves/stem, total number of leaves/sprout, number of dried leaves/stem and number of dried leaves/sprouts. The parametric variance analysis and its homologous non-parametric, Kruskal-Wallis test and the Generalized Lineal Model were taken into account. The theoretical assumptions of the variance analyses to the test error normality were verified. The Shapiro Wilk test, Kolmogorov Smirnov and the Lilliefors test were used, Shapiro Wilk test was the most robust to detect lack of normality. For the variance homogeneity, the Bartlett and Levene test were used both with similar results. The variables were transformed with the square root transformation which did not improve the normal distribution adjustment to the variable number of dried leaves/sprout. The probability values maintained the same outcomes respect to Ho tests for the non-parametric test, compared with its homologous parametric F from Fisher test. The criteria of goodness of fit in the Generalized Linear Model permitted evaluating the best adjustment effects. It was considered that this model is more flexible than the parametric variance analyses because the variables under study did not require the theoretical assumptions fulfilment.

Palabras clave : Transformation of data; parametric ANOVA and non-parametric; Generalized Linear Model.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License