SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 número2Las micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas. Alternativas para su organización jurídica en CubaCaracterización de las condiciones socioambientales de la escuela primaria José Antonio Echeverría Bianchi, del municipio de Pinar del Río, Cuba índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina

versão On-line ISSN 2308-0132

Resumo

VALLE DIAZ, Felipe Rafael. Monopoly and inequality in young people´s access to public universities of Peru. Estudios del Desarrollo Social [online]. 2021, vol.9, n.2  Epub 01-Jul-2021. ISSN 2308-0132.

The objective if the study was: to reflect, to argue why the exclusive monopoly of vacancies and production of services in basic secondary education, limit and condition the access and inequity of opportunities of for young applicants to public universities in Peru, 2014 to 2020. The research approach was qualitative, case study type, narrative design. It was concluded: The monopoly of the Pre-University Centers in the universities is illegitimate, it is not the function and competence of the major houses of studies, according to the tacit, exposed in the University Law 30220, a Production Center, generates direct income that allows its self-financing; they develop the university functions of extensionism and innovation, from the Research Institutes and/or Centers for the Production of Products and/or Services. Access to the university is through an admission exam, by selection test, the vacancies that are offered in each Admission process per semester, or the total between the fixed 20% are consigned to the University Pre-University Center, out of the 10% for exceptional cases due to equity and social resilience policy. This decision generates the displacement of the competition, due to the extrema opportunity of admission offered by the University Pre-University Center. In addition, it violates rights, conceals inequity, towards young applicants who did not register for preparation in the University Pre-University Center, it does not allow to obtain reliable indicators against the competition because there is no equivalent pair and even the University subsidizes the Center Pre University.

Palavras-chave : monopoly; inequity; access; pre-university center; university law.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )