SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número1Cirugía de la hernia inguinal en la tercera edad: ambulatoria y con hospitalización cortaColecistectomía con anestesia local como recurso en el paciente anciano índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Cubana de Cirugía

versão impressa ISSN 0034-7493

Resumo

ARAGON PALMERO, Felipe Jorge et al. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus minimal-invasive hysterectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Rev Cubana Cir [online]. 2011, vol.50, n.1, pp. 82-95. ISSN 0034-7493.

INTRODUCTION. At the present time three types of hysterectomies are used: the vaginal hysterectomy and the minimal-invasive hysterectomy (MIH). The objective of present research was to compare the MIH and the total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in women presenting with benign uterine diseases. METHODS. A systemic review was made and a meta-analysis from the following databases: MEDLINE, EBSCO HOST AND The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only the controlled and randomized studies were selected. The data of all studies were combined and also the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI was used with the Mantel-Haenszel method as an effect measure for dichotomy variables. For the analysis of continuing variables the mean difference was used. In all the comparisons performed the results were obtained with the fix effect and randomized forms. RESULTS. A total of 53 transoperative complications were registered in the MIH hysterectomy versus 17 in the TAH group (RR: 1,78; 95% CI: 1,04-3.05). Postoperative complications evolved in a similar way in both groups without significant differences from the statistical point of view. The blood losses, the hospital stay and the patient's reincorporation to usual and work activities were lesser in the laparoscopy group; however, the operative time is higher when it is compared with TAH (mean difference: 37,36; 95% CI: 34,36-39,93). CONCLUSIONS. Both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The indication of MIH must to be individualized according to the clinical situation of each patient and these not to be performed in those centers without a properly trained surgical staff and with experience in advanced minimal invasive surgery.

Palavras-chave : Hysterectomy; laparoscopy; laparoscopy surgery; laparoscopy hysterectomy; abdominal hysterectomy.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )