SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número1Competência de resolução de conflitos: diretrizes teórico-metodológicas para sua formação em estudantes de SociologiaImpacto da pós-graduação nas habilidades profissionais dos graduados índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Mendive. Revista de Educación

versão On-line ISSN 1815-7696

Resumo

ALBORNOZ JIMENEZ, Carlos Francisco; SILARAYAN RUIZ, Liliana Abelina  e  HIDALGO TUPIA, Manuel Alberto. Learning styles in virtual teaching in university students. Rev. Mendive [online]. 2022, vol.20, n.1, pp. 83-92.  Epub 02-Mar-2022. ISSN 1815-7696.

The present work has an objective to identify which learning styles predominate in the Statistics course, virtual university modality, third cycle. The study is quantitative and cross-sectional. For this, the CHAEA test was applied to 269 students from the Norbert Wiener University of Lima through the student's virtual platform. A descriptive analysis was carried out with the SPSS 24. The normality test of the scores obtained in each style was also applied and for the inferential analysis the non-parametric tests of Friedman and the Mann Whitney U were used. The highest average score was the Reflective style with 15.8 and the lowest was the Active style with 12.1 (p <0.01). When evaluating the score of each student, the most predominant styles were Reflective (43.5%) and Theoretical (21.9%). Likewise, predominance in pairs of two styles was observed: Reflective-Theoretical (11.5%). A higher percentage of moderate preference was found in the Active, Reflective and Theoretical styles and a High preference in the Pragmatic style. There were no significant differences when comparing the styles by gender, faculty and type of student (validating and regular). In students under 20 years of age, the highest average was the Active style (12.7); while the Reflective style obtained the highest average in each gender, faculty, type of student and age group. The reliability of the CHAEA measured by the Kuder-Richardson coefficient was 0.803 and between the styles, 0.536 to 0.629.

Palavras-chave : questionnaire; virtual teaching; learning styles; university students, predominance.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol | Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )