SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.48 número4Hernioplastia sin tensión con colgajo autógenoHernioplastia laparoscópica sin fijadores específicos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Cubana de Cirugía

versión impresa ISSN 0034-7493versión On-line ISSN 1561-2945

Resumen

LOPEZ RODRIGUEZ, Pedro Rolando et al. Comparison between open repair with mesh and the Desarda technique in inguinal hernia. Rev Cubana Cir [online]. 2009, vol.48, n.4. ISSN 0034-7493.

INTRODUCTION: With present paper we gave response to some controversies around the repair of inguinal hernias as well as to make a valuation on postoperative pain and to analyze the costs of prosthetic repair techniques and the technique reinforcing the posterior wall of inguinal channel with a pediculate aponeurotic band of major obliquus muscle. METHODS: A random prospective study was conducted in 836 patients presenting with inguinal hernia, operated on between September, 2001 and December, 2007. A group underwent anterior hernioplasty with mesh and in the other we used Mohan P. Desarda technique, which is a herniorrhaphy without mesh. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were comparable without differences regarding age, localization and type of hernia. Surgical time was lesser in mesh hernioplasty and without significant differences regards pain during the first and third postoperative days, but the group with hernioplasty the time was superior at fifth day. In three patients there was a polypropylene mesh rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Desarda's technique without mesh was more economic than mesh hernioplasty; this difference was statistically significant.

Palabras clave : Desarda's herniorrhaphy; cost analysis; mesh.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons