SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue1Traumatic Pelvic InjuriesIliotibial band syndrome author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología

On-line version ISSN 1561-3100

Abstract

TABARES NEYRA, Horacio Inocencio; DIAZ QUESADA, Juan Miguel; TABARES SAEZ, Horacio  and  MORALES SEIFE, Roberto. Unstable trochanteric fractures. Extramedullary or intramedullary fixation?. Rev Cubana Ortop Traumatol [online]. 2021, vol.35, n.1  Epub June 01, 2021. ISSN 1561-3100.

Introduction:

Unstable trochanteric fractures show difficulty in achieving stable osteosynthesis, early support and rapid social reintegration. They are treated by intra or extramedullary osteosynthesis, the later, by using a static or dynamic screw plate. Intramedullary implants have sliding nails or screws.

Objective:

To review the literature published from 2015 and 2020 that compares the different methods of surgical fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Search strategy:

We searched in PubMed for publications from 2010 to 2020 in English with the terms “unstable trochanteric fractures”, “treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur”, “osteosynthesis in unstable femoral trochanteric fractures”.

Conclusions:

Unstable trochanteric fractures have a tendency to varus displacement with medialization of the diaphysis. The static nail-plate shows high failure rates, higher than that of the sliding nail-plate (DHS), but the trochanteric stabilizing plate (TSP) seems to be the best implant for extramedullary osteosynthesis, which is very similar to that reported with intramedullary implants.

Keywords : unstable trochanteric fractures; extramedullary osteosynthesis; intramedullary osteosynthesis.

        · abstract in Spanish | French     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )