SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue1From competency-based training to entrustable professional activitiesRisk analysis in patient-specific therapy for hyperthyroidism in Cuba author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas

On-line version ISSN 1729-519X

Abstract

HERRERA MASO, Juan Rubén et al. Method for expert consultation at three levels of validation. Rev haban cienc méd [online]. 2022, vol.21, n.1, e4711.  Epub Mar 10, 2022. ISSN 1729-519X.

Introduction:

The method for expert consultation is commonly applied to scientific research conducted in the Social Sciences to validate scales, approaches, planning, politics, and other matters in decision making; however, its incorrect, indiscriminate, and partial use is confirmed.

Objective:

To validate the need to apply the method for expert consultation at three levels in order to determine: the competence of experts; the reliability of the instrument used; and the consensus among experts on the topic approached.

Material and Methods:

Systematization of documents related to the use of the method for expert consultation in scientific research, master´s and doctoral theses, articles, monographs, and other publications. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied.

Results:

It is confirmed that the application of the method for expert consultation following the appropriate procedures allows for an increase in the methodological rigor and a contribution to scientific research.

Conclusions:

The method for expert consultation is an effective tool in scientific research provided that it is rigorously applied.

Keywords : Experts; competition; reliability; consensus; non-parametric statistical tests; criteria of judges.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )