SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número3Correlación entre densidad y resistencia mecánica del suelo obtenida con sondas de diferentes geometríasOrganización racional del complejo cosecha-transporte en caña de azúcar con la integración de modelos matemáticos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias

versão On-line ISSN 2071-0054

Resumo

ARACELLY-LOPEZ, Diana et al. Comparison of Three Variants of Substrate Preparation Used in the Propagation of Cocoa Standards. Rev Cie Téc Agr [online]. 2020, vol.29, n.3, pp.37-49.  Epub 01-Set-2020. ISSN 2071-0054.

This research was conducted to compare three variants of substrate preparation used in mass propagation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in nursery conditions. Three treatments were studied: T1-manual mixing with shovel, T2-mechanized mixing with motorized cultivator and T3-mechanized with mixer. Evaluations were made of the physical-chemical characteristics of the substrate, compaction, cotyledon height, number of leaves per plant, stem diameter, plant height at 20, 40 and 60 days, fresh weight of the plant and root and root length. The results showed that there are no statistically significant differences between the treatments, i.e. the method of preparation of the substrate does not have a direct incidence on the agronomic response of the plant, in the conditions and period investigated. The physical-chemical analysis of the mixed substrates showed, in all three cases, a sandy loam texture with an apparent density ranging from 1,17 to 1,19 g/cm3, as well as an organic matter content ranging from 1,9 to 3,2 %. The average pH was 5.9. No statistically significant differences were found between the treatments in terms of effects on the vegetative development of the plant throughout the development cycle evaluated. The economic analysis showed that it is more profitable to use mechanized technology if it is used in mass propagation centers, since the productivity of the machines is three (T2) and four times (T3) more than the manual variant.

Palavras-chave : substrate; cocoa seedlings; substrate mix.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf )