SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue3Technologies for Agriculture: Impact of a web-based system for managing maintenance in cocoa cropsImprovements to the “Fraud Attention” process of the drinking water company in Guayaquil, Ecuador author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Universidad y Sociedad

On-line version ISSN 2218-3620

Abstract

BORJA MARTINEZ, Geovanny Leopoldo; AMORES ESTRADA, Steban Matheo  and  MOPOSITA PILLA, Wilmer. The Evaluation of Prior Testimony and Its Impact on Judicial Processes in Ecuador. Universidad y Sociedad [online]. 2025, vol.17, n.3  Epub June 30, 2025. ISSN 2218-3620.

The research analyzed the impact of prior testimony in Ecuadorian judicial processes, focusing on how it affects the principles of immediacy and contradiction. The study used the "Metástasis" case as a reference, where inconsistencies in the application of this evidentiary mechanism were identified. The main objective was to determine how prior testimony influences the fairness of criminal proceedings and to propose alternatives to improve its implementation. A qualitative-quantitative methodology was used, combining documentary analysis with the CRITIC method to assess evaluation criteria for potential solutions. A SWOT analysis was conducted to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the judicial system concerning prior testimony. The results indicated that while this mechanism protects vulnerable victims and ensures the preservation of key evidence, it also creates risks of bias and limits the possibility of effective contradiction. It was found that distrust in the judicial system and the lack of clear regulations affect its legitimacy. As recommendations, priority was given to designing awareness campaigns to build public trust, creating multidisciplinary teams to improve the quality of testimonies, and providing continuous training for judges and prosecutors in specialized interview techniques. It was concluded that it is essential to balance evidentiary effectiveness with the protection of procedural rights and to strengthen judicial ethics to minimize the influence of external factors in the administration of justice.

Keywords : Procedural guarantees; Judicial rights; Prior testimonial evidence; Judicial impartiality.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )