SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2Variabilidad en patrones de coloración y ornamentación larval de Chloridea virescens (Fabricius) en diferentes plantas hospedantesReproducción y efecto nocivo de Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid y White) Chitwood en Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‛Cuba-Cueto-25-9’ índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de Protección Vegetal

versão impressa ISSN 1010-2752versão On-line ISSN 2224-4697

Rev. Protección Veg. vol.33 no.2 La Habana maio.-ago. 2018

 

Artículo Original

Probability of occurrence of the mixed infection Canditatus phytoplasma sp. - Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) in Phaselous vulgaris L.

Probabilidad de ocurrencia de infección mixta Canditatus phytoplasma sp. - Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) en Phaselous vulgaris L.

Ileana Miranda-Cabrera1  * 

Madelaine Quiñones-Pantoja1 

1Dirección Sanidad Vegetal, Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (CENSA). Apdo 10, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to determine the probable occurrence of the mixed infection phytoplasma - BGYMV in Phaselous vulgaris L. and the symptoms associated. This probability was calculated using classical probability and a smoothed adjustment of the series of not centered moving median was used to estimate the presence of a mixed infection in two close points. The conditional probabilities of a mixed infection knowing the a priori probabilities of phytoplasma and begomovirus were calculated using the classical formula of probability. The influence of present symptoms in the agricultural ecosystem on the probability of this mixed infection to increase and its association with the vector presence were evaluated using principal component analysis and canonical discriminate test. The occurence of a mixed infection was more probable when it was known a priori that the phytoplasma was present than when it was the begomovirus. Symptoms in the bean crop associated with the mixed infection were wrinkled leaves, mosaic, and reduced size of the leaves. Even in the presence of the vector, leaf chlorosis and deformation were associated with a low probability of mixed infection, which suggested the presence of a unique virus or another disease. We suggest that this association can be used in the prediction of mixed diseases as an initial prognosis leading to a rapid diagnosis with reduced costs due to a better selection of samples.

Key words: Bayes theorem; BGYMV; phytoplasma; canonical discriminate analysis; Phytopathogens; Phytoplasma

RESUMEN

El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar la probabilidad de ocurrencia de infección mixta Canditatus phytoplasma sp. - BGYMV en Phaselous vulgaris L. y los síntomas asociados. La probabilidad se estimó utilizando un ajuste suavizado de la serie de la media móvil no centrada. Las probabilidades condicionales de presencia de infección mixta, conociendo a priori la presencia de fitoplasmas o begomovirus, se calcularon usando la fórmula clásica de probabilidad. Se evaluó, además, la influencia de síntomas presentes en el agroecosistema sobre la probabilidad de incremento de la infección mixta y su asociación con la concurrencia del vector, mediante un análisis de componentes principales y discriminante canónico. La existencia de infección mixta fue más probable cuando se conoce a priori que el fitoplasma está presente, que cuando se establece primero la presencia de begomovirus. Los síntomas en el cultivo de frijol que más se asociaron con la presencia de infección mixta fueron arrugamiento de las hojas, mosaico y reducción del tamaño de las hojas. Aun en presencia del vector, la clorosis de la hoja y la deformación se asociaron con una baja probabilidad de infección mixta, lo cual sugiere la presencia de un virus único u otra enfermedad. Este resultado puede ser utilizado en la predicción de enfermedades mixtas, como una prognosis inicial que conduzca a un diagnóstico rápido con costo reducido, al hacer una mejor selección de las muestras; asimismo, apoyará la toma de decisiones para el manejo integrado de plagas en el cultivo.

Palabras clave: BGYMV; discriminante canónico; fitopatógenos; fitoplasma; teorema de Bayes

INTRODUCTION

Phytopathology has historically dealt with those diseases caused only by a causal agent and its identification and pathogenic mechanisms in a particular crop. However, we frequently find complex agricultural ecosystems where biotic and abiotic relationships exist. The biotic interactions can cause complex diseases where the pathogen activity is strengthened by the effect of other pathogen (synergism) (1).

When several pathogens occur in a crop, mixed infections can be found and the symptoms may be confused, being the diagnosis only possible by using molecular techniques (2,3).

In particular, the common bean (Phaselous vulgaris L.), an important component of the animal and human diet, for its high protein value (4), is highly vulnerable to the attack of diverse insects with a negative influence on the crop (5). These insect behave like vectors of viral infections. Important viral species are the bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) and the bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV), both transmitted by seeds, mechanically and by aphids (6); the beet curly top virus (BCTV), transmitted by Circulifer tenellus Baker; the bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV); and the bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV), transmitted by white fly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) (7). Also, species of tysanopterans have been informed associated with the transmission of tospovirus in bean, like Caliothrips phaseoli Hood, Frankliniella insularis Franklin, Frankliniella williamsi Hood, Frankliniella vespiformis Crowford, Thrips palmi Karny, Thrips tabaci Lindeman (8). Other important insects are the Empoasca spp. vectors of phytoplasma and have been informed associated with begomovirus producing the symptom complex (9)

The existence of a mixed infection phytoplasma - virus has been demonstrated using molecular analysis by PCR of field samples (9,10). The probability of existence of mixed infection can be calculated using Bayes' theorem; it establishes the relationship between the prior and posterior probabilities, with the advantage that the use of verisimilitude permit quantifying the probability of infection or disease in one plant. However, this technique has not been used very much by psychopathologists (11). Besides, there are methods such as the canonical discriminant analysis that permit identifying variables that are correlated with the presence - absence of another variable (12), these can be useful to identify symptoms correlated with mixed infections.

Also, the good use of statistics techniques will permit answering the several questions: Can the symptoms appearing in the bean crop be attributed to the presence of a mixed infection? Which is the frequency percentage of mixed infection occurrence?

Then, the objective of this work was to determine the probability of the mixed infection phytoplasma - begomovirus in Cuban localities and the major symptoms correlated with the mixed infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the period 2011-2012, the commercial cultivar Bat-304 of P. vulgaris was sampled at two famer properties of the municipalities of Güines, four fields of San José de las Lajas (Mayabeque province located at 22°34' -23°12' N latitude and 82°28' - 81°40' W longitude), and two fields of Cotorro (Havana province located at 23°01'34 '' N latitude and 82°14'51 '' W longitude). A total of 120 samples were collected from each corner and the center of a rectangle in each field. After eliminating the damaged samples, between 7 and 14 samples for location, a total of 99 samples with different phenological ages was left: 11 with 35 days, 58 with 60 days and 30 with 70 days.

The presence or absence of begomovirus (13) or phytoplasma (14) characteristic symptoms appearing in each sample was recorded. The symptoms examined were mosaic, wrinkled leaves, and reduction of the leaf size, yellowing, dwarfism, chlorosis, violaceous stems, deformed leaves, dark-colored nerves, and spotted and thick stems. The presence of Ca. phytoplasma sp. and BGYMV in each sample was tested by specific PCR and nested PCR multiplex (15)

Prediction by smoothed adjustment

The not centered moving median was calculated by predicting the probability of a fourth sample to be positive to mixed infection if two of three samples taken consecutively were positive.

This series is constructed with the average of the value in one point and two foregoing items (12)

Classical formula of probability

Taking the presence of mixed infection (success A) and the presence of phytoplasma of begomovirus(success B) as processes , the conditional probability of the mixed infection presence P (mixed/begomovirus) and P(mixed/ phytoplasma) were calculated. For it, the classical formula of probability was applied (16,17):

[TeX:] P(A/B)=Number of success/Number of possible events

The conditional probabilities were compared using Wald with correction method (18).

Associations in the ecosystem

The most frequent symptoms that occurred in each locality were identified by a principal component analysis and a biplot graph. The typical symptoms of a mixed infection were selected using a canonical discriminate analysis and the chi square independence test. The statistical system InfoStat 2.0 was used (12).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Prediction by smoothed adjustment

The prediction by a smoothed adjustment showed 85.8 % of coincidence (Fig. 1). This showed that a correct prediction would be possible if the samples were arranged by a geographic location order. In consequence, if two of three samples taken consecutively were positive to a mixed infection, the probability of a fourth sample to be positive was higher than 0.8.

FIGURE 1 Mixed infection predicted using not centered moving median. / Infección mixta predicha mediante la serie media móvil no centrada 

Classical formula of probability

Of the total of the analyzed samples, 55.5 % presented phytoplasma and 61.6 % begomovirus. Both diseases were present in 44.4 % of the samples. The presence of mixed infection was more probable when it was known a priori that phytoplasma was present than when it was the begomovirus (p<0,01). It is important to know that when the phytoplasma or the begomovirus were present the probability of finding a mixed infection was above 70 % (Table 1).

[TeX:] P(mixed/begomovirus)=44/55=0.721

[TeX:] P(mixed/phytoplasma)=44/61=0.80

TABLE 1 Simple and mixed infections in samples from Cuban localities. Comparison of conditional occurrence percentages. / Infección simple y mixta en muestras de localidades cubanas. Comparación de la probabilidad de ocurrencia condicional 

Mixed infection phytoplasma begomovirus
+ - + -
+ 44 0 44 0
- 11 44 17 38
Total 55 44 61 38
χ2 63.36 16.42
p 0.0001 0.0001
Percentage of conditional occurrence 80 % a 72.13 % b

Different letters indicate significant differences, according to Wald´s test with correction for continuity (p≤0.05)

The mixed infection of phytoplasma - begomovirus was favored in areas with a maximum temperature between 28 and 30°C, a minimum of 18 to19°C, an annual average of 121 days with rains and a relative humidity of 77 to 85 %. In general, the mixed infection occurred more frequently than by pyhtoplasma or begomovirus alone. This effect could be observed in a farm in Güines, in three farms in San José, and in a special way, in a farm in Cotorro, where simple infections did not appear. Besides, the incidence of these diseases was markedly lower in both farms in Cotorro than in the other farms (Fig. 2). Mixed infections occurred less frequently in urban areas, indicating the importance of crop management and the control of those factors associated with the development of the diseases in smaller extensions of land. The crops in these areas are adjacent to arvensis plants, which may function as alternative vector hosts contributing to reduce the inoculum pressure in the field and, consequently, the occurrence of diseases (19).

FIGURE 2 Single and mixed infection incidence by locality. / Por ciento de incidencia de infección simple y mixta para cada localidad 

This fact demonstrated that, in addition to the environmental factors, crop management is important to counteract the diseases caused by the presence of phytopathogens.

Different factors favor the proliferation of diseases in the crops, such as the existence of an active pathogen agent, an appropriate host and environmental conditions for the infection, colonization and reproduction of the pathogen agent. The environmental factors also affect the competitive capacity of the vector. The interaction host-pathogen - environment has allowed to use ecological principles to reduce the losses from diseases (19).

In contrast, the BGYMV has been considered devastating for bean production (20), with most of the farmers making indiscriminate use of chemicals (21) affecting the environment and the biodiversity among other elements of the ecosystem.

The principal factors that contribute to the proliferation of single and mixed diseases in crops are the excessive use of pesticides and of infested plant materials (9). In these affected localities, the biological control can lead to a reduced use of insecticides when they are included within the management strategy. This should be together with an appropriate farmer training (22).

Associations in the ecosystem

The most frequent symptoms in each locality were identified (Fig. 3) and informed to farmers in order to associate these symptoms with the possible presence of important diseases because some farmers could confuse the causes of these symptoms.

FIGURE 3 Characterization of the sampled localities according to the most frequent symptoms present in the crop. / Caracterización de las localidades muestreadas de acuerdo con la frecuencia de aparición de síntomas en el cultivo 

The symptoms most associated with the presence or absence of mixed infection were mosaic, wrinkled leaves, reduction of the leaf size, chlorosis, deformed leaves, and the presence of the vector. (Table 2)

TABLE 2 Symptoms associated with the presence of the mixed infection phytoplasma - begomovirus in common bean in localities of Cuba. / Síntomas asociados a la presencia de infección mixta fitoplasma-BGYMV en frijol común en localidades de Cuba 

Symptoms Wilk´s Lambda F p χ2 p
mosaic 0.823 20.812 0.001 15.83 0.001
wrinkled leaves 0.940 6.191 0.015 4.99 0.025
reduction of the leaf size 0.865 15.139 0.001 11.92 0.001
yellowing 0.982 1.767 0.187 1.06 0.302
dwarfism 0.994 .610 0.437 0.303 0.582
chlorosis 0.886 12.468 0.001 9.506 0.002
Violaceous stems 1,000 .025 0.875 0.026 0.873
Deformed leaves 0.957 4.369 0.039 3.08 0.079
Dark-colored nerves 0.992 .798 0.374 0.808 0.369
spots 0.992 .798 0.374 0.808 0.369
thick stems 0.980 1.996 0.161 0.978 0.323
presence of vector 0.936 6.632 0.012 6.34 0.012
plant age 0.962 3.862 0.052 4.52 0.104

p≤0.05 indicate symptom associate with mixed infection.

The results of the present work allow introducing some important aspects into the disease management in the bean crop and into the comprehensive training of farmers. For example, these results allow implying a high probability of mixed infection occurrence when mosaic, wrinkled leaves, or the reduction of the leaves size are present, even when the presence of white fly or leaf hoppers are not observed. In addition, if a plant is positive to phytoplasma, it is estimated to have an 80 % of probability of being also positive to mixed infection.

Of course, it is advisable to take measures to control vectors, for their synergic or antagonistic biotic interactions with unpredictable pathological consequences (23). Mixed infections have to be analyzed with an epidemiological approach, keeping in mind the interaction of the vectors (24).

It is convenient to remark that the appropriate use of statistical methods makes possible an effective prognostic. The canonical discriminate analysis proved to be a useful method in the identification of symptoms that increased the probability of a mixed infection presence. This allows a reduction of costs of sample analysis, since the visual identification of more severe symptoms presupposes the existence of multiple infections in a crop (19).

Our work agrees with Martínez et. al. (25) in that the management actions so far adopted are not enough to strengthen the management program of the white fly - begomovirus complex. We add the importance of looking at the relationships with other vectors like the leaf hoppers to avoid the proliferation of mixed infection.

The coexistence of insect vectors in the ecosystems affects with the proliferation of phytoplasma, begomovirus and tospovirus (26) in correspondence with multiple factors (27), which must be approached by projects for the management of populations in consequence with the natural enemies conservation, the selection of more resistant varieties, the rational use of water, the identification of the best sowing time, among other factors.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to PhD Eduardo Sistachs for their helpful revision and the laboratory technician Bertha Piñol for her support in the laboratory studies. This research was carried out with the support of the Project “System for the ecological studies and prediction of vector dynamics” funded by the National Program for the Climate Change in Cuba: Impact, Mitigation, and Adaptation, of the Environment Agency, Cuba.

REFERENCES

1. Jeger MJ. Biotic interactions in plant-pathogen associations. Ed. British Society for Plant Pathology Jeger y Spence. 2001; 300pp. [ Links ]

2. Swarnalatha P, Reddy K. Duplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Begomovirus and Phytoplasma from naturally infected tomato. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems. 2014; 20(1):59-68. [ Links ]

3. Davis T, Bosque-Pérez N, Foote N, Magney T, Eigenbrode S. Environmentally dependent host-pathogen and vector-pathogen interactions in the Barley yellow dwarf virus pathosystem. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2015; 52:1392-1401. [ Links ]

4. Imra H, Asif A, Tariq M, Anwaar A, Shaukat B. Nutritional and Health Perspectives of Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): An Overview. Journal Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2014; 54(5):580-592. [ Links ]

5. Duran A, Lambert T, Velázquez R. Evaluación de genotipos mejorados de frijol negro Phaseolus vulgaris en barinas y monagas, Venezuela. Rev. Cienc. Agríc. 2014; 31 (2): 63 - 75. [ Links ]

6. Anaya-López JL, Silva-Rosales L, Montero-Travera V, Espejel F, Acosta-Gallegos JA. Retos y oportunidades en la selección asistida de frijol resistente a BCMV y BCMNV en México. I. Dimensión del problema. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 2015; 6(8):453-465. [ Links ]

7. Singh S, Schwartz HF. Breeding common bean for resistance to diseases: A review. Crop Science. 2010; 50: 2199-2223. [ Links ]

8. Méndez A, Chirel JL. Principales insectos nocivos asociados al cultivo del frijol en la parroquia Valle de la Pascua, Estado Guárico, Venezuela. Rev. Científica Multidisciplinaria. 2017; 1(1):15-24. [ Links ]

9. Quiñones M, Acosta K, Zamora L, Miranda I, Piñol B, Santos-Cervantes M E, Méndez J, et al. Coexistencia de "Candidatus Phytoplasmas asteris" y begomovirus en Cuba: Estudio de casos en cultivos de Fabáceas. Rev. Protección Veg. 2015; 30(Supl 1):57. [ Links ]

10. Tao Y, Man J, Wu Y. Development of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction for simultaneous detection of wheat viruses and a phytoplasma in China. Arch Viro. 2012; 157: 1261-1267. [ Links ]

11. Ayllón MA, Cambra M, Llave C, Moriones E. Enfermedades de plantas causadas por virus y viroides. Ediciones Bubok Publishing Sociedad Española de Fisiopatología. 2016; 360p. https://www.bubok.es/libros/247548/Enfermedades-de-plantas-causadas-por-virus-y-viroidesLinks ]

12. Di Rienzo J, Casanoves F, Gonzalez L, Tablada E, Díaz M, Robledo C, Balzarini M. Estadística para las Ciencias Agropecuarias. InfoStat versión. 2016; Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. URL http://www.infostat.com.ar. [ Links ]

13. Quiñones M, Martinez Y, Arana F, Martínez MA, Zamora L, Miranda I, Zerbini F M. Coexistencia de potyvirus y begomovirus en el cultivo del pimiento (Capsicumannuum. L) en Cuba. Rev. Protección Veg. 2013; 28(1): 36-44. [ Links ]

14. Zardón M, Gallo A, Mesa JM, Arencibia A, Zamora L, Martínez Y, Sautié M, et al. Detección de infecciones mixtas en genotipos de caña de azúcar en Cuba. Rev. Protección Veg. 2012; 27(2): 77-84. [ Links ]

15. Acosta K, Martínez Y, Zamora L, Fernández A, Santos-Cervantes ME, Leyva-López NE. PCR múltiple anidada para detección de fitoplasmas y rickettsia asociados con los síntomas del cogollo arrepollado (bts) en papayo. Rev. Protección Veg. 2011; 26(3):156-163. [ Links ]

16. Bayes T. An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1763; 53: 370-418. [ Links ]

17. Rial A, Varela J. Estadística práctica para la investigación en ciencias de la salud. Netbibio. 2014; 344p. [ Links ]

18. Correa JC, Sierra E. Intervalos de confianza para la comparación de dos proporciones, Revista Colombiana de Estadística. 2003; 26: 1-14. [ Links ]

19. Thresh JM. The role of weeds and wild plants in the epidemiology of plant virus diseases. In: Thresh JM Edition, Pests, Pathogens and Vegetation. 1981: 53-70. [ Links ]

20. Echemendía AL, Ramos PL, Villarreal N, Martínez AK, González G, Morales FJ. Caracterización del virus del mosaico amarillo dorado del frijol en Cuba. Fitosanidad. 2010; 14: 11-17. [ Links ]

21. Vazquez L. Manejo de plagas en la agricultura ecológica. Boletín fitosanitario INISAV. 2010; 15(1):120 p. [ Links ]

22. Juan JI. Uso y manejo de recursos naturales en los procesos agrícolas de una comunidad del subtrópico mexicano. Progreso Hidalgo, México. Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. 2014; 11(1): 58-68. [ Links ]

23. Hull R. Matthew´s Plant Virology, 4th Edition Academic Press, San Diego. 2002; 300p. [ Links ]

24. Lebsky V, Hernández-González J, Arguello-Astorga G, Cardenas-Conejo Y, Poghosyan A. Detection of phytoplasmas in mixed infection with begomoviruses: a case study of tomato and pepper in Mexico. Bulletin of Insectology. 2011; 64: 55-56. [ Links ]

25. Martínez Y, Martínez M, Quiñónez M, Miranda I, Holt J, Chancellor T. Estudio de factores que influyen en la epifitología del complejo mosca blanca-begomovirus en la región oriental de Cuba, Rev. Protección Veg. 2009; 24 (1): 47-50. [ Links ]

26. Miranda I, del Toro M, Sánchez-Castro A, Ramírez S, Baños HL, Suris M, Fernández M. Coexistencia de Empoascaspp. (Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) y tisanópteros en Phaseolusvulgaris L. Rev. Protección Veg. 2016; 31(3): 165-172. [ Links ]

27. Sánchez-Castro A, Miranda I, Quiñones M, Piñol B, Fernández M. Saltahojas (Typhlocybinae) y su relación con los síntomas de enfermedades en un campo de frijol (Phaseolusvulgaris L.). Rev. Protección Veg. 2016; 31(3):153-158. [ Links ]

Recebido: 04 de Abril de 2018; Aceito: 23 de Junho de 2018

*Autor para correspondencia: Ileana Miranda Cabrera. E-mail: ileanam@censa.edu.cu

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License