SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número1Interferón alfa-2b cubano. Treinta años como un medicamento eficaz y seguroEvaluación de la termoestabilidad del ARN viral almacenado como pellet seco a temperatura ambiente índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Biotecnología Aplicada

versão On-line ISSN 1027-2852

Biotecnol Apl vol.34 no.1 La Habana jan.-mar. 2017

 

RESEARCH

 

Standardization of variables involved in cadmium and zinc microbial removal from aqueous solutions

 

Estandarización de variables involucradas en la remoción microbiana de cadmio y cinc en solución acuosa

 

 

María E Carballo-Valdés1, Armando Martínez1, Irina Salgado1, Lizandra Pérez1, Mario Cruz1, María B Liva2, Sheyla Alleyne2, Mónica M Rodríguez3, Yolanda Garza3

1 Microbiology and Virology Department. Faculty of Biology, University of Havana. 25 e/ J e I No 455, Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución, Habana, Cuba.
2 Laboratorio LUCES. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de los Materiales, Universidad de La Habana. Zapata y G s/n, Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución, Habana, Cuba.
3 Departamento de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Mexico.

 

 


ABSTRACT

Water is an important natural resource for life and its chemical pollution is one of the most serious problems the current society is facing. Therefore, an environment-friendly method to reduce metal contaminants of aquatic ecosystems is required, and one potentially useful method for treatment of wastewater comprises the use of microbial biosorption. The objective of this work was to determine the effects of the main variables involved in cadmium and zinc removal by Pseudomonas mendocina (Ps-1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc-10). Variables like pH, metal concentration, physiological age of the culture and state of the microbial biomass were assessed. The pH, metal concentration and the dead or inactive biomass had greater significant effect on the biosorption of cadmium and zinc by both microorganisms. The adjustment of the variables tested facilitated the increase of capture levels of the metal ions, which indicates that under the determined conditions P. mendocina (Ps-1) and S. cerevisiae (Sc-10) can be used in the decontamination of wastewater containing both heavy metals.

Keywords: microorganisms, biosorption, removal, cadmium, zinc, treatment variables.


RESUMEN

El agua es un recurso natural importante para la vida y su contaminación química constituye uno de los problemas más graves que enfrenta la sociedad actual. Un método amigable con el medio ambiente para disminuir contaminantes metálicos de ecosistemas acuáticos lo constituye la biosorción microbiana con aplicación en el tratamiento de aguas residuales. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar los efectos de las principales variables involucradas en el proceso de remoción de cadmio y cinc por Pseudomonas mendocina (Ps-1) y Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc-10). Se evaluaron las variables pH, concentración de los metales, edad fisiológica del cultivo y estado de la biomasa microbiana. El pH, la concentración de los metales y la biomasa muerta o inactiva presentaron un mayor efecto significativo sobre la biosorción de cadmio y cinc por ambos microorganismos. El ajuste de las variables ensayadas facilitó incrementar los niveles de captura de los iones metálicos, lo que indica que bajo las condiciones determinadas P. mendocina (Ps-1) y S. cerevisiae (Sc-10) pueden utilizarse en la descontaminación de aguas residuales que contienen ambos metales pesados.

Palabras clave: microorganismos, biosorción, remoción, cadmio, cinc, variables del tratamiento.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Environmental pollution by heavy metals compromises the quality of water resources, human health and ecosystems in general [1, 2]. The resistance of these inorganic compounds to biodegradation conditions their permanence in nature, as well as their incorporation and accumulation through the food chain to toxic levels. Their toxicity supports the negative environmental impact they produce, even at very low concentrations [3, 4]. Cadmium affects the renal system, liver, blood, bone degeneration and can cause cancer [5]. On the other hand, the accumulation of zinc in organisms causes stress and toxic effects on cells [6, 7]. These damages indicate the need to remove these metals from the effluents, before being discharged to the receiving bodies, in particular to aquatic environments.

Water is an essential component for life and its contamination by metallic species has been recognized and reported by different authors [4, 8]. The application of biotechnological processes with microbial biomass is an ecological alternative for the protection of this natural resource. Metabolic activity and physiological responses of bacteria, yeasts, fungi and microalgae facilitate the removal of metals from contaminated effluents [9, 10]. On the other hand, cell structures favor the use of microorganisms as biosorbents, due to the diversity of cation sorption sites present in the cell wall [11].

The bioremediation of environments contaminated by heavy metals, through mechanisms such as bioaccumulation and biosorption allow the capture of cations by microbial cells [12-14]. These bioprocesses depend on the microorganism and on the environmental conditions. Different operational parameters such as: pH, ion and cell concentration, microorganism-metal contact time, biomass pretreatment and culture age, have a significant influence on metal bioremediation [4, 15], since they are involved in the sequestration of ions. Thus, it is necessary to study the experimental conditions that increase the natural capacities of microbial biosorbents to capture heavy metals. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of the adjustment of different environmental variables on zinc and cadmium removal by Pseudomonas mendocina (Ps-1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc-10).

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microorganisms used

The microorganisms Pseudomonas mendocina (Ps-1) and Saccharomyce cerevisiae (Sc-10) were used, from the Collection of Microbial Cultures of the Faculty of Biology, University of Havana and selected for having levels of zinc and cadmium ion removal above 20 mg/g, reported previously [16].

Metal solutions

Cd (II) and Zn (II) solutions were prepared in sterile bidistilled water, from salts of cadmium chloride tetrahydrate (CdCl2 · 4H2O) and zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4·7H2O), both at the concentration of 1 mM/L, and their pH was adjusted to a value of 6.0.

Microbial culture

Bacteria was cultured in Nutrient broth and nutrient agar medium [17] and yeats in Yeast glucose medium (5 g yeast extract, 10 g glucose, 1 L distilled water; pH 7.0) [17]. Briefly, preinoculums were prepared by microbial inoculation of 50 mL of the respective liquid medium cultures in erlenmeyers of 250-mL effective volume. The flask were inoculated with a loop from solid medium cultures either in Nutrient agar (bacterium) and Yeast extract-glucose agar (yeast), and incubated at 30 ± 2 ºC for 4 h under agitation (100 rpm). Biomasses were propagated in erlenmeyers flasks of 500 mL effective volume, filled with 200 mL of the given liquid medium for each type of microorganism as used for preinoculation. The flasks were inoculated from each preinoculum at 5 % of the final volume. Two cultures were done per microorganisms, in order to provide enough material for the experiments of metal ion removal.

Biosorption experiments

Cultures in nutrient broth and yeast-glucose extract were obtained for the bacteria and yeast, respectively, which were incubated at 30 °C in an orbital screen (Infors HT, Labotron, Switzerland) at 100 rpm for 24 h. Each culture was precipitated and washed with double distilled water by centrifugation at 3500 g for 20 min in a Labofuge 200 centrifuge, Kendro Laboratory, Germany. Subsequently, the microbial biomasses were contacted with the individual metals solutions in a biomass-metal ratio of 2 g/L: 1 mM/L. The microorganism-metal suspension was stirred in orbital screen at 100 rpm at 28 °C, the pH maintained at 6.0 with 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. At 24 h the supernatant was harvested at 3200 g for 20 min, in Eppendorf Centrifuge (Sigma 1-14, Sigma Laborzentrifugen, Germany). After the biosorption experiments the residual metal was determined to 1 mL of the supernatant by atomic absorption spectrometry. In the control of the biosorption process solutions of the metals were used, at the concentrations established in each experiment, without adding the biomass and maintaining the same experimental conditions of the samples.

Residual metal analysis

Residual metal samples were analyzed on an air flame-acetylene atomic absorption spectrometer (Philips PU 9100X, The Netherlands). The lamp current used for 8 mA for Cd (II) and 10 mA for Zn (II). Wavelengths of 228.8 nm and 230.9 nm were used for Cd (II) and Zn (II), respectively. The instrumental conditions were optimized for achieving maximum sensitivity. Reagents of analytical purity or higher were used. Standard solutions of Cd (II) and Zn (II) were prepared by dilution of standard certified reference solutions of 1000 μg/mL; (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water with conductivity less than 0.05 μS/cm (Milli-Q Ultrapure Water, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used. All samples were analyzed according to the instructions of the equipment manufacturer.

The amount of metal captured by microbial biomass (q: mg of metal per gram of biomass, expressed as mg/g) was calculated by the mass balance equation for biosorbents, as reported in the literature [13].

Test of the biosorption of metals under different experimental conditions

The conditions established in the biosorption experiment, previously described, were maintained and only the analyzed factor was varied as appropriate, as follows.

pH

The initial pH of the solutions of the metals was adjusted to values of 5.0; 6.0 and 7.0 by using 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH. Later on, the microbial biomass was added and in each biomass-metal slurry the initial pH value was maintained up to 24 h by addition of the acid or base as required.

Initial concentration of the metal

The solutions of the metals were used at the following concentrations 1; 1.5 and 2 mM/L.

Determination of the physiological age of the culture

The capture of metals was carried out with microbial biomass collected in two different physiological stages, corresponding to the 14 and 24 h of growth. Microbial growth in nutrient broth for bacteria and yeast-glucose extract for yeast, incubated at 30 °C in orbital screen (Infors HT, Labotron, Switzerland) at 100 rpm for 24 h, was estimated by a spectrophotometer (JENWAY 6305 Spectrophotometer, UK) at λ= 640 nm and at different time intervals of 2 h, against non-inoculated medium used as target. Growth curves were determined by relating absorbance, measured periodically, against time [18].

Biomass inactivation

Cell pellets collected by centrifugation, after 24 h of growth, were inactivated by dry heat at 60 °C in a furnace for 12 h and then brought into contact with the solutions of metals.

Statistical analyses

All the experiments were run in triplicate. Experimental data were tested by ANOVA and normal distribution and variance homogeneity were determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett’s tests, respectively. The amount of captured metal per gram of biomass (q mg/g) was evaluated by one-tailed ANOVA. Then, statistically significant results were analyzed by the Tukey’s test run a posteriori, by comparing means at a significance level of 0.05. Results were processed with the aid of the Microsoft Excel® software and the statistical package Statistica for Win-dows, version 6.1. The error of the mean was expressed as standard deviation.

 

RESULTS

Zinc and cadmium removal values (Table 1) show that the bacterium P. mendocina (Ps-1) and the yeast S. cerevisiae (Sc-10) showed capacity for capturing both metals. The bacterium reached removal values higher than 22 mg/g and yeast above 27 mg/g, which were higher in the capture of cadmium ions.

Figure 1 shows the influence of pH on the removal of metals by bacterium and yeast. The lowest zinc and cadmium capture was observed at pH 5.0 values, followed by an increase by both microbial biomasses at pH 6.0. The increase of this variable at pH 7.0 caused the cation capture values to decrease, except for cadmium which did not show significant differences in yeast removal at pH 6.0 and 7.0.

The effect of metal concentration in solution on the microbial removal process is shown in Table 2. The two microorganisms tested achieved the highest capture of zinc and cadmium at the concentration of 1.5 mM/L, with removal values of more than 34 mg/g of zinc and 41 mg/g of cadmium. Statistical analyses indicated that at the higher concentrations a different behavior is evident for each metal in both microorganisms, since zinc capture decreases, maintaining cadmium removal stable.

Figure 2 shows that zinc and cadmium capture levels by P. mendocina (Ps-1) did not show significant differences between the two physiological stages analyzed, corresponding to the final stage of exponential growth (14 h) and to the Stationary growth phase (24 h). A similar behavior was detected in cadmium removal by S. cerevisiae (Sc-10). Nevertheless, yeast reached statistically higher capture values against zinc ions with cells grown up to 24 h.

Cellular inactivation caused by dry heat pretreatment, applied to bacteria and yeast biomass, provided increases in zinc and cadmium ion sequestration. This favorable effect in the removal of metals is shown in Table 3, where it is observed that the dead biomass of P. mendocina (Ps-1) and S. cerevisiae (Sc-10) had higher capacity for the capture of cadmium ions.

 

DISCUSSION

The removal of zinc and cadmium by bacteria and yeast is a consequence of interactions between cells and metal ions, based on the properties of each of the microbial species (biochemical, structural, physiological and genetic) and of the chemical characteristics of cations. The capture of these chemical contaminants may be bioaccumulation-mediated [1, 19], a mechanism dependent on cellular metabolism involving living cells, requiring transport systems that internalize the cations to cytosol [20] and by biosorption. In particular, the biosorption mechanism is present in living and dead cells; it is characterized as being passive and requires different functional groups such as carboxyls, hydroxyls, phosphates and amino, components of microbial cell walls. These negatively charged groups act as active metal binding sites through physicochemical interactions that favor the extracellular accumulation of cations [21].

Reductions in the capture of metals at pH 5.0 are related to the protonation of the functional groups. At this pH, competences are established between protons and cations with the ligands of the cell wall and extracellular capture of metal ions is limited. At higher pH values, the retention of metals in biomass is facilitated by the predominance of negative charges on the cell surface, as the amount of H+ decreases [22], which could explain the results at pH 6 and 7, as compared to the 5.0 value. Other authors have supported the increased availability of active sites in the cell wall by increasing pH in the biomass-metal suspension [23, 24]. Nevertheless, a decrease in the capture of the ions at pH 7 was detected, which may be due to the possible formation of hydroxylated complexes of metal ions [25]. Precipitation of metal ions as hydroxides at pH values above 6.0 has been corroborated in previous works [26, 27]. An exception in this behavior was obtained in cadmium capture by S. cerevisiae (Sc-10). Yeasts have the ability to accumulate intracellularly high cadmium concentrations by the presence of metallothioneins, cysteine-rich proteins that have high affinity for this ion, compared to others [28]. This capture mechanism may be less dependent on the chemistry of the metal in solution.

The results indicated that metal removal capacity increased and reached saturation with the increased initial concentration of zinc and cadmium ions in the aqueous solution. At low metal concentrations, the interactions between them and the binding sites are favored by the availability of free functional groups located in the cellular envelopes [29]. All this said, this behavior does not remain linear at higher concentrations, where ion retention by microbial biomass decreases or stabilizes due to saturation of the cell surface with cations [3, 30]. The lack of sufficient free functional groups for biosorption, as a consequence of their saturation, favors the availability of non-adsorbed cations in the aqueous solution [31].

Zinc and cadmium ion retention by P. mendocina (Ps-1) and S. cerevisiae (Sc-10) in different physiological stages or growth phases may be due to the extracellular and intracellular capture of metals. Similar results have been reported for other microbial species in metal capture [23, 32]. In extracelular accumulation, the interactions of ions with active groups of the cell surface [23] are fundamental and can occur throughout the cell cycle. Bioaccumulation requires cellular metabolism [33] and it is therefore associated with a more active physiological state. Metal removal by microorganisms is a complex process that depends on the age of the culture, among other factors [14, 23]. This biotic factor affects the capture of metals because of structural changes in the cell wall or due to the decrease of the entrance of ions into the interior of the cell [34], which can explain the decrease in zinc capture by yeast at 24 h of growth.

The increase in metal capture by inactivated or dead cells, compared to the removal abilities of living cells, is the result of the effectiveness of the pre-treatment by dry heat. This physical method could remove impurities present on the cell surface, offer greater surface area and expose intracellular components from the rupture of cellular envelopes. In this manner, a greater exposure of functional groups constituting cation binding sites is facilitated [21, 35]. Pretreatment to microbial biomass by different physical and chemical methods has been supported in literature as an alternative to increase metal removal [35] and in the determination of biosorption mechanisms [36]. Cell inactivation could eliminate any potential harmful effect of P. mendocina for human health when applied in large amounts for bioremediation, since it is not a GRAS (generally regarded as safe) microorganism. This may also favor the use of S. cerevisiae, which is GRAS certified.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudomonas mendocina (Ps-1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc-10) have considerable capacity as biosorbents for the removal of Zn (II) and Cd (II) from aqueous solutions. In metal removal, it was very important to adjust factors influencing the process, which allowed increasing ion capture capacities in both microorganisms. The pH value 6.0 as well as the initial concentration of zinc (1.5 mM/L) and cadmium (1.5 to 2.0 mM/L) resulted in the most favorable operating conditions for removal. Cell inactivation was effective and the increased capture of Cd (II) in 2.5 and 1.7 times by bacterium and yeast, respectively, was highlighted in this condition. Application of dead biomass in the disposal of metal contaminants can be an economically viable, efficient and environment-friendly method to prevent environmental damage caused by zinc and cadmium.

 

REFERENCES

1. Samarth DP, Chandekar CJ, Bhadekar RK. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solution using Bacillus licheniformis. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2012;10(2):12-9.

2. Abbi O, Kazemi M. A review study of biosorption of heavy metals and comparison between different biosorbents. J Mater Environ Sci. 2015;6:1386-99.

3. Abioye DS, Adefisan AE, Aransiola SA, Damisa D. Biosorption of chromium by Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from waste dump site. Expert Opin Environ Biol. 2015;4:1.

4. Patel R, Chandel M. Effect of pH and temperature on the biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus licheniformis. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4:2272-5.

5. Zaki S, Farag S. Isolation and molecular characterization of some copper biosorped strains. Int J Environ Sci Tech. 2010;7:553-60.

6. Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A. Zinc in plants. New Phytol. 2007;173(4):677-702.

7. Ahmed MJ, Uddin MN, Islam MN, Islam MS, Abdullah MF. Physicochemical assessment of soil pollutants due to the ship breaking activities and its impact on the coastal zone of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Eur Chem Bull. 2013;2(12):975-80.

8. Daboor SM. Application of bacterial biomass as a potential heavy metal bioremoval agent. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8:2229-37.

9. Aryal M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M. Binding mechanism and biosorption characteristics of Fe (III) by Pseudomonas sp. cells. J Water Sustain. 2013;3(3):117-31.

10. Olukanni DO, Agunwamba JC, Ugwu EI. Biosorption of heavy metals in industrial wastewater using microorganisms (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Am J Sci Ind Res. 2014;5(2):81-7.

11. Jaroslawiecka A, Piotrowska-Segel Z. Lead resistance in microorganisms. Microbiol. 2014;160(Pt 1):12-25.

12. Nanganuru HY, Korrapati N. Studies on biosorption of cadmium by Pseudomonas putida. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2012;2(3):2217-9.

13. Ahmady-Asbchin S. Comparison of biosorption of cadmium (II) from aqueous solution, by Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Iran J Chem Eng. 2013;10(2):14-21.

14. Lin J, Harichund C. Isolation and characterization of heavy metal removing bacterial bioflocculants. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;4(6):599-607.

15. Mohamed DS. Application of bacterial biomass as a potential heavy metal bioremoval agent. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8:2229-37.

16. Carballo ME, Martínez A, Salgado I, Maldener I, Alvarez M, Boza A, et al. Capacidad de captura de cadmio y cinc por bacterias, microalgas y levaduras. Rev Cubana Cienc Biol. 2012;1(1):10-23.

17. Atlas RM. Handbook of microbiological media. 4th edition. Washington: CRC Press; 2010.

18. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Bender KS, Buckley DH, Stahl DA. Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 14th edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2015.

19. Odokuma O, Akponah E. Effect of concentration and contact time on heavy metal uptake by three bacterial isolates. J Environ Ch Ecotoxico. 2012;2(6):84-97.

20. Banerjee S, Gothalwal R, Sahu PK, Sao S. Microbial observation in bioaccumulation of heavy metals from the ash dyke of thermal power plants of Chhattisgarh, India. Adv Biosci Biotechnol. 2015;6(2):131-8.

21. Archana A, Jaitly AK. Mycoremediation: utilization of fungi for reclamation of heavy metals at their optimum remediation conditions. Biolife. 2015;3:77-106.

22. Feng N, Guo X, Liang S, Zhu Y, Liu J. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by chemically modified orange peel. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185(1):49-54.

23. Joo JH, Hassan SHA, Oh SE. Comparative study of biosorption of Zn2+ by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus cereus. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 2010;64(8):734-41.

24. Farooq U, Kozinski J, Khan MA, Athar M. Biosorption of heavy metal ions using wheat based biosorbents-a review of the recent literature. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(14):5043-53.

25. Bhagyalakshmi MG, Sarma PN. Removal of Ni (II) from aqueous solutions using sugarcane bagasse. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7:140-7.

26. Abdel-Ghani NT, El-Chaghaby GA. Biosorption for metal ions removal from aqueous solutions: a review of recent studies. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol. 2014;3(1):24-42.

27. Lunavath V, Mamidala E. Preliminary phytochemical screening and antibacterial studies of the leaves of Eclipta alba. Int J Pharma Biosci. 2013;4:380-4.

28. Thippeswamy B, Shivakumar CK, Krishnappa M. Accumulation potency of heavy metals by Saccharomyces sp. indigenous to paper mill effluent. J Environ Res Dev. 2012;6:439-45.

29. Acosta I, Zarate M, Cárdenas JF, Gutiérrez C. Bioadsorción de cadmio en solución acuosa por biomasa fúngica. Rev Inf Tecnol. 2007;18:9-14.

30. Iram I, Abrar S. Biosorption of copper and lead by heavy metal resistant fungal isolates. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2015;5:1-5.

31. Mohammad O, Mohammad SK, Almas Z. Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thurigiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2013;20:121-9.

32. Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Karimi F, Barazesh B, Ghezelbash G. Equilibrium, kinetic and isotherm of some metal ion biosorption. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19:987-92.

33. Zolgharnein H, Mohd-Azmi ML, Saad MZ, Mutalib AR, Mohamed CAR. Detection of plasmids in heavy metal resistance bacteria isolated from the Persian Gulf and enclosed industrial areas. Iran J Biotechnol. 2007;5:232-9.

34. Delgado A, Barreiro AM, Novais MJ. Heavy metal biosorption by the mycelium of Fusarium flocciferum. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 1996;37:241-4.

35. Runa R, Prasad TM. Assessing the morphological characters for taxonomic significance among intraspecific variations of Catharanthus roseus. Biolife. 2014;2:1002-7.

36. Barange M, Srivastava A, Srivastava JK, Palsania J. Biosorption of heavy metals from wastewater by using microalgae. Int J Chem Phys Sci. 2014;3(6):67-81.

 

 

Received in July, 2016.
Accepted in March, 2017.

 

 

María E Carballo-Valdés. Microbiology and Virology Department. Faculty of Biology, University of Havana. 25 e/ J e I No 455, Vedado, Plaza de la Revolución, Habana, Cuba. E-mail: mecarballo@fbio.uh.cu.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons