<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2218-3620</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Universidad y Sociedad]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Universidad y Sociedad]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2218-3620</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial "Universo Sur"]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2218-36202023000600456</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Garantía de Motivación en Medidas Cautelares: Evaluación del Cumplimiento de la Nueva Jurisprudencia Ecuatoriana]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Guarantee of Motivation in Injunctions: Evaluation of the Compliance of the New Ecuadorian Jurisprudence]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Contreras Vivanco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jonathan Enrique]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benavides Salazar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristian Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benavides Salazar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julio Cesar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silvio Amable]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Machuca Vivar]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes Santo Domingo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>456</fpage>
<lpage>468</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2218-36202023000600456&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2218-36202023000600456&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2218-36202023000600456&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN En el contexto del Estado constitucional ecuatoriano, se busca promover la correcta motivación como un valor fundamental en la cultura jurídica. La CCE estableció nuevas pautas de evaluación de la garantía de motivación en la sentencia No.1158-17-EP/21. La presente investigación tiene como objetivo, evaluar la posible vulneración de la garantía de motivación, en los autos emitidos por parte de los administradores de justicia al momento de resolver la petición de medidas cautelares autónomas, en un cantón de la República de Ecuador. Participaron 9 especialistas de las ciencias jurídicas, los cuales aplicaron una guía de revisión de casos diseñada para este estudio, sustentada en la sentencia No.1158-17-EP/21. Los autos de medidas cautelares evaluados presentaron violaciones significativas en la garantía de motivación, particularmente se detectó la incidencia recurrente de vicios motivacionales relacionados con incongruencias, inatinencias e incomprensiones. Aunque se observan fundamentos jurídicos adecuados, existen carencias en las fundamentaciones fácticas y jurídicas suficientes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT In the context of the Ecuadorian constitutional State, the correct motivation is sought to be promoted as a fundamental value in the legal culture. The ECC established new guidelines for the evaluation of the guarantee of motivation in Ruling No.1158-17-EP/21. The objective of this research is to evaluate the possible violation of the guarantee of motivation, in the orders issued by the administrators of justice at the time of resolving the request for autonomous precautionary measures, in a canton of the Republic of Ecuador. Nine legal science specialists participated, who applied a case review guide designed for this study, based on Ruling No. 1158-17-EP/21. The orders of precautionary measures evaluated presented significant violations in the guarantee of motivation, particularly the recurrent incidence of motivational defects related to incongruence, inconsistencies and misunderstandings was detected. Although adequate legal grounds were observed, there were deficiencies in the factual and legal foundations.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Debido proceso]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Motivación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Medidas cautelares]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Pautas de evaluación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Due process]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Motivation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Precautionary measures]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation guidelines]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peltier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Un año de ley de sentencia: enero 2018-diciembre 2018]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho Penal]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>11-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Covid&#8208;19, Free Exercise, and the Changing Constitution.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hastings Center Report]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>6-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What Pleases The Prince? The Relevance of Classical Legal Principles to Contemporary Public Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revue Internationale Des Droits De L&#8217;Antiqué, Forthcoming]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. Registro Oficial Suplemento N. 52]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constitucional</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Constitución de la Republica del Ecuador. Registro Oficial N. 449]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Ecuador. Corte Constitucional</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sentencia No.1158-17-EP-21. (Caso Garantía de la motivación)]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ecuador ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Corte Constitucional]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hatori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Restriction to an Injunctive Relief in Patent Infringement Proceedings under the Japanese Patent Act. MIPLC]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kankam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The use of paradigms in information research]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Library &amp; Information Science Research]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>85-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larroucau-Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La dualidad cautelar y sumaria de la protección de derechos fundamentales]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista chilena de derecho]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>479-511</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[FRAND Defences Against the Grant of Injunctive Relief: Applying Huawei v ZTE in Singapore and China]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Asian Journal of Comparative Law]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>33-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[(Let's) playing by the rules: A choice of law rule for communication of copyright material from video games to the public, through Let's Plays]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Computer Law &amp; Security Review]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>105828</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lingwall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[&#8220;In One Direction Only&#8221;: Chains of Reasoning and Tail Events in CAFA Amount&#8208;in&#8208;Controversy Claims]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Business Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>369-417</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercado Melo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Medina Saurith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Incidencia de las medidas cautelares en el proceso ejecutivo en relación con la ejecución de la garantía real.]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Corporación Universidad de la Costa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mezzanotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simcoe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Política de patentes e innovación estadounidense después de eBay: un examen empírico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Política de investigación]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1271-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montes Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La debida motivación en las resoluciones judiciales que otorgan medidas cautelares en aplicación de la Ley 30364, Ley para Prevención, Sanción y Erradicación de la Violencia Familiar. TACNA]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scharen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The practice of claiming injunctive relief for patent infringement in Germany.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Intellectual Property Law &amp; Practice]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>112-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Terán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Las medidas cautelares constitucionales en Ecuador.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Jurídica Crítica y Derecho]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
