<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0034-7493</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Cubana de Cirugía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Cir]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0034-7493</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Ciencias Médicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0034-74932018000300005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Factores de riesgo de tiempo quirúrgico prolongado en la Histerectomía laparoscópica]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Risk Factors under Lengthened Surgical Time in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Annia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López Abreu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Yolaisy]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pujol Legrá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pedro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario &#8220;Carlos Manuel de Céspedes&#8221;  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bayamo Granma]]></addr-line>
<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0034-74932018000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0034-74932018000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0034-74932018000300005&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción:  Las histerectomías constituyen uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos más realizados a nivel global. Las ventajas de la histerectomía laparoscópica incluyen menos sangrado intraoperatorio, menor estancia hospitalaria, recuperación más rápida y disminución de la tasa de infección del sitio quirúrgico. Sin embargo, todo esto a expensas de un tiempo quirúrgico mayor, costo superior, e incremento en las lesiones ureterales y vesicales.  Objetivo: Identificar los factores de riesgo que influyen en la prolongación del tiempo quirúrgico en las pacientes sometidas a una histerectomía laparoscópica.  Método: Estudio observacional analítico de casos y testigos fueron evaluadas las pacientes sometidas a una histerectomía laparoscópica videoasistida desde enero del 2012 hasta diciembre 2016 en el Hospital Universitario &#8220;Carlos Manuel de Céspedes&#8221;. Bayamo, Granma, Cuba. Estas pacientes constituyeron la población de estudio. La muestra estuvo formada por los casos, que lo constituyeron todas las pacientes con tiempo quirúrgico prolongado (&#8805; 130 minutos), y los controles que fueron aquellas pacientes con tiempo quirúrgico inferior a 130 minutos. Se realizó un muestreo probabilístico con pareamiento aproximado para cada variable.  Resultados:  En el análisis univariado constituyeron factores de riesgo en la demora del tiempo de duración de este tipo de intervención el antecedente de cesáreas previas (p 0,001), útero con peso superior a 320 gramos (p= 0,001), movilidad al tacto vaginal (p= 0,013), dificultad en el descenso uterino al tacto vaginal (p= 0,003), y la ejecución de otra intervención durante la histerectomía (p= 0,003). En el análisis multivariado el útero con peso superior a 320 g (p 0,012), la realización de otra intervención durante el procedimiento (p= 0,021) y la cesárea previa (p= 0,043), fueron los principales factores de riesgo identificados.  Conclusiones:  Los factores que más influyeron en la prolongación del tiempo de duración de la histerectomía fueron el antecedente de cesárea, útero con peso estimado superior a los 320 g y la ejecución de otras intervenciones durante el mismo procedimiento.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction:  Hysterectomies are one of the surgical procedures most performed worldwide. Among the advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy, we can mention less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, and decreased infection rate in the surgical site. However, all this is achieved at the expense of a longer surgical time, higher cost, and increase in ureteral and bladder injuries.  Objective:  To identify the risk factors that influence the lengthening of surgical time in patients undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy.  Method:  An analytical, observational case-control study. We evaluated the patients performed video-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy from January 2012 to December 2016 at Carlos Manuel de Céspedes University Hospital in Bayamo, Granma (Cuba). These patients made up the study population. The sample consisted of the cases, made up by all patients with lengthened surgical time (130 minutes or more), and the controls, those patients with surgical time less than 130 minutes. A probabilistic sampling was carried out with approximate matching for each variable.  Results:  In the univariate analysis, the risk factors were the delay for this type of intervention, the antecedents of previous caesarean sections (p=0.001), uterus weighing more than 320 grams (p=0.001), mobility to vaginal touch (p=0.013), difficulty in uterine descent to vaginal touch (p=0.003), and the execution of another intervention during hysterectomy (p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, we identified the uterus weighing more than 320 g (p=0.012), performing another procedure during the procedure (p=0.021), and previous caesarean section (p=0.043) as the main risk factors.  Conclusions:  The factors that influenced the lengthening of the hysterectomy most were antecedents of cesarean section, uterus with an estimated weight greater than 320 g, and the execution of other interventions during the same procedure.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[histerectomía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[laparoscopia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cirugía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[hysterectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[laparoscopy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[surgery]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wechter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nguyen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Visco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstetrics and Ginecology]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>110</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1091-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murillo Ibarrola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedraza González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguirre Osete]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Histerectomía por laparoscopia experiencia de 10 años en el Hospital Español de México]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>667-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayala Yáñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Briones Landa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anaya Coeto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leroy López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zavaleta Salazar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Histerectomía total laparoscópica estudio descriptivo de la experiencia institucional con 198 casos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>605-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Caprio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGlynn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Gynecol Surg]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>213-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whiteman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hillis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jamieson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morrow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Podgornik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>198</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>34-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2011]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<edition>Edición Especial</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MINSAP]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pandit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alsop]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Using international data to set benchmarks for morbidity outcomes after hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Gynaecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>133</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>84-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barlow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lethaby]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tavender]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Methods of hysterectomy systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>330</volume>
<page-range>1478</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mäkinen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johansson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomás]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomás]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heinonen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laatikainen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1473-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shepherd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hudgens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yussman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biscette]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pasic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Stepwise approach to laparoscopic hysterectomy evaluation of technique and cost benefit]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Surg Technol Int]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>166-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgan Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López Zepeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elorriaga García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto Pineda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lelevier Rico]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Histerectomía total laparoscópica complicaciones y evolución clínica en una serie de 87 casos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ginecol Obstet Mex]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>520-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Müller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thiel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Winkler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Häberle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beckmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hysterectomy-A Comparison of Approaches]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dtsch Arztebl Int]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>107</volume>
<numero>20</numero>
<issue>20</issue>
<page-range>353-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Song]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factors associated with complications and conversion to laparotomy in women undergoing laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>620-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lafay Pillet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leonard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chopin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malaret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borghese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foulot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Incidence and risk factors of bladder injuries during laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies a 14.5 years experience in a continuous series of 1501 procedures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>842-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nieboer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spaanderman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MEA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bongers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vierhout]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kluivers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gynecol Surg]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>359-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fountain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mason]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Napp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hawe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The eVALuate study two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>328</volume>
<numero>7432</numero>
<issue>7432</issue>
<page-range>129-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jones]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HJS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Cossart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Risk scoring in surgical patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br J Surg]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>86</volume>
<page-range>149-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shushan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohamed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How long does laparosocopic surgery really take Lessons learned from 1000 operative laparoscopies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Human Reprod]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>39-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shushan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohamed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A case-control study to compare the variability of operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Human Reprod]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1467-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Catanzarite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pilecki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Longer operative time during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy is associated with increased 30-day perioperative complications]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>1049-58</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Catanzarite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vieira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Qin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Risk Factors for Unscheduled 30-day Readmission after Benign Hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[South Med J]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>524-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Driessen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[la Chapelle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Twijnstra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rhemrev]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jansen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy A Systematic Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>317-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bettaiah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reddy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic Hysterectomies Our 10 Years Experience in a Single Laparoscopic Center]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Obstet Gynaecol India]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>274-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smorgick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeLancey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patzkowsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Advincula]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Song]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[As-Sanie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy for benign indications]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>581-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Polat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kahramanoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Senol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Senturk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ozkaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karateke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of the Effect of Laparoscopic and Abdominal Hysterectomy on Lower Urinary Tract Function, Vaginal Length, and Dyspareunia A Randomized Clinical Trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>116-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macciò]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chiappe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kotsonis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nieddu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lavra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surgical outcome and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large myomatous uteri in relation to uterine weight a prospective study in a continuous series of 461 procedures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Gynecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>234-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yavuzcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caglar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ustün]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dilbaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumru]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for normal and enlarged uterus (&amp;gt;280 g)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Gynecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>289</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>831-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Venkatesh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Growdon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ecker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[York-Best]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>214</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>607-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jones]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harmanli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Citil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effect of concomitant oophorectomy on the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Gynaecol Obstet]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>84-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Novetsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curtin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1280-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deffieux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rochambeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gauthier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamblin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hysterectomy for benign disease clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>202</volume>
<page-range>83-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
