<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0034-7507</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Cubana de Estomatología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Estomatol]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0034-7507</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Ciencias Médicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0034-75072020000200012</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Uso de scanners intraorais em implantodontia]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Uso de los escáneres intrabucales en implantología]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Use of intraoral scanners in implantology]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernardi Berutti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lorenzo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[e Silva Campos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Débora]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dantas Batista]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[André Ulisses]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal da Paraíba  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[João Pessoa Paraíba]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal do Ceará  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Fortaleza Ceará]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0034-75072020000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0034-75072020000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0034-75072020000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[RESUMO  Introdução: O escâner intraoral é um aparelho que surge como alternativa aos métodos convencionais de moldagem utilizando a técnica de impressão digital. O meio acadêmico vem realizando diversos estudos para avaliar a real efetividade da tecnologia e sua aplicabilidade clínica.  Objetivo: Analisar resultados obtidos em estudos sobre escâneres intraorais na área de implantodontia quanto ao tipo de escâneres e acurácia, tempo de trabalho e preferência do operador e do paciente.  Métodos: Foram realizadas buscas de artigos nas bases de dados &#8220;Pubmed&#8221; e &#8220;SciELO&#8221; utilizando os seguintes descritores: «intraoral AND scanner AND implant», «digital AND scanner AND implant» e «digital AND impression AND implant» em inglês, português e espanhol respectivamente. Os critérios de inclusão foram: artigos de avaliação clínica (in vivo) ou laboratorial (in vitro) que avaliassem o uso da técnica de escaneamento intra-oral para impressão digital de implantes com acesso integral, escritos em português, inglês ou espanhol e publicados a partir de 2013.  Análise e integração da informação: Foram encontrados 158 artigos. Após a análise e seleção, 35 artigos foram incluídos, sendo 28 laboratoriais e 7 clínicos. Apesar de limitações na padronização dos estudos, percebemos o potencial e a viabilidade da técnica digital, com resultados clínicos e de acurácia favoráveis e vantagens como redução do tempo e etapas de trabalho, comunicação dinâmica com os laboratórios, preferência de pacientes e estudantes de odontologia e facilidade de incorporação por profissionais já experientes.  Conclusões: Estudos laboratoriais indicam que, além de vantagens quanto ao uso de materiais de moldagem, comunicação com os laboratórios e facilidade de manipulação, a técnica digital pode alcançar resultados superiores aos da técnica convencional, assim, a técnica se mostra promissora para a área de implantodontia sendo necessário, contudo, estudos futuros, especialmente in vivo, para avaliar a consistência dos resultados clínicos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción:  El escáner intrabucal es un aparato que surge como una alternativa frente a los métodos convencionales de moldeo, y el medio académico viene realizando diversos estudios para evaluar la real efectividad de esta tecnología y su aplicabilidad clínica.  Objetivo:  Analizar resultados obtenidos en estudios sobre escáneres intrabucales en el área de implantología en cuanto a los tipos de escáneres y la exactitud, tiempo de trabajo y preferencia del operador y del paciente.  Métodos:  Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos "PubMed" y "SciELO" utilizando los siguientes descriptores: &#8220;intraoral AND scanner AND implant&#8221;, &#8220;digital AND scanner AND implant&#8221; and &#8220;digital AND impression AND implant&#8221; en inglés, portugués y español, respectivamente. Los criterios de inclusión fueron: artículos clínicos o de laboratorio para evaluar el uso de la técnica de escaneamiento digital de los implantes, con acceso completo al artículo, escrito en portugués, inglés o español y publicados desde 2013.  Análisis e integración de la información:  Se encontraron 158 artículos. Después del análisis y selección, 35 artículos fueron incluidos, siendo 28 de laboratorio y 7 clínicos. A pesar de las limitaciones en la estandarización de los estudios, percibimos el potencial y la viabilidad de la técnica digital, con resultados clínicos y de precisión favorables y ventajas como reducción del tiempo y etapas de trabajo, comunicación dinámica con los laboratorios, preferencia de pacientes y estudiantes de odontología y facilidad de incorporación de profesionales experimentados.  Conclusiones:  Los estudios de laboratorio indican que, además de ventajas en cuanto al uso de materiales de moldeo, comunicación con los laboratorios y facilidad de manipulación, la técnica digital puede alcanzar resultados superiores a los de la técnica convencional, por lo que el uso de escáneres intrabucales se muestra prometedor para el área de implantología siendo necesario, sin embargo, estudios futuros, especialmente in vivo, para evaluar la consistencia de los resultados clínicos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction: Intraoral scanners are devices that emerged as an alternative to conventional impression methods. A variety of studies have been conducted to evaluate the actual effectiveness of this technology and its clinical applicability.  Objective:  Analyze the results obtained by studies about intraoral scanners in the area of implantology in terms of types, accuracy, working time, and operator and patient preference.  Methods:  A search was conducted in the databases PubMed and SciELO using the following descriptors: &#8220;intraoral AND scanner AND implant&#8221;, &#8220;digital AND scanner AND implant&#8221; and &#8220;digital AND impression AND implant&#8221; in English, Portuguese and Spanish. The inclusion criteria were the following: clinical or laboratory papers evaluating the use of digital implant scanning technique, full access to the paper, written in Portuguese, English or Spanish and published as of the year 2013.  Data analysis and integration:  Of the 158 papers obtained and analyzed, 35 were selected: 28 laboratory and 7 clinical. Despite the limitations in the standardization of the studies, we perceive the potential and viability of the digital technique, with favorable clinical and accuracy results, as well as advantages such as a reduction in work time and stages, dynamic communication with laboratories, preference by patients and dental students and ease of technical incorporation by experienced dentists.  Conclusions:  Laboratory studies indicate that, in addition to the advantages concerning the use of impression materials, communication with laboratories and ease of manipulation, the digital technique may achieve better results than conventional impression techniques. The use of intraoral scanners is therefore a promising technique for the area of &#8203;&#8203;implantology. However, further studies should be conducted, especially in vivo, to evaluate the consistency of the clinical results obtained.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Implantes Dentários]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Precisão da Medição Dimensional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[implantes dentales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[técnica de moldeo odontológico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[precisión de la medición dimensional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[dental implants]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[dental impression technique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[accuracy of dimensional measurement]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SCGB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freitas CHS de]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Antunes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JLF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Perdas dentárias no Brasil análise da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal 2010]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Saude Publica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>^s3</numero>
<issue>^s3</issue>
<supplement>3</supplement>
<page-range>78-89</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carlsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Omar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Oral Rehabil]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>143-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soto-Penaloza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zaragozi-Alonso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Penarrocha-Diago]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Penarrocha-Diago]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The all-on-four treatment concept Systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Clin Exp Dent]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>e474-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pjetursson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarauz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strasding]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sailer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zwahlen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zembic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>160-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turkyilmaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Company]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGlumphy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures the use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gerodontology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Ministério da Saúde (BR)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Secretaria de Atenção a Saúde. Portaria no 718, de 20 de dezembro de 2010]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<page-range>100-3</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Diário Oficial da União]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Driscoll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freilich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guckes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knoernschild]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mcgarry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>e1-e105</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigues]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigues]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R de QF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dias]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AH de M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Batista]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AUD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Avaliação in vitro entre diferentes técnicas e métodos de união de transferentes de moldagem utilizados na implantodontia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>285-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bhakta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vere]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Impressions in implant dentistry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br Dent J]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>211</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>361-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khatri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tated]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Failures in dental implantology - A Literature Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Appl Dent Med Sci]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>55-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[So]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hochstedler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ercoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The accuracy of implant impressions a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>100</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>285-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pradíes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Rus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Özcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>56-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andriessen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rijkens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van der Meer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wismeijer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles A pilot study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>186-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrero-Climent]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz-Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ríos-Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Padrós]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of implant casts generated with conventional and digital impressions-an in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Environ Res Public Health]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>1599</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gherlone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gastaldi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capparé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive all-on-four; restorations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Implant Dent]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>125-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Joda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lenherr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dedem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kovaltschuk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bragger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zitzmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NU]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions a randomized controlled trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1318-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flügge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Att]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metzger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Precision of dental implant digitization using intraoral scanners]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>277-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Setti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pesce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression traditional techniques versus a digital procedure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Investig]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1253-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pesce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Setti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Precision and accuracy of a digital impression scanner in full-arch implant rehabilitation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>171-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esguerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VAP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KBC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Three-dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>120-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Amin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finkelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Rafie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kudara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papaspyridakos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital vs conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1360-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chew]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esguerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teoh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Effects of different scanners and implant level]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>70-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fukazawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odaira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont Res]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>450-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Özcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pradíes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>650-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Imburgia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Logozzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hauschild]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Veronesi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology a comparative in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Oral Health]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>17-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vandeweghe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vervack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dierens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Bruyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants an in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>648-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alshawaf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H-P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finkelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Rafie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kudara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papaspyridakos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions A comparative in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>835-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marghalani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H-P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finkelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kudara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El Rafie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papaspyridakos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches An evaluation of accuracy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>119</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>574-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alikhasi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siadat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nasirpour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hasanzade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Three-dimensional accuracy of digital impression versus conventional method effect of implant angulation and connection type]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Dent]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>2018</volume>
<page-range>3761750</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Veronesi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hauschild]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mijiritsky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology A comparative in vitro study. Papaccio G, editor]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS One]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papaspyridakos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GO]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C-JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hanssen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Naert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vandenberghe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients accuracy outcomes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>465-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esguerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teoh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In vitro three-dimensional accuracy of digital implant impressions the effect of implant angulation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>313-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zitzmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NU]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kovaltschuk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lenherr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dedem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Joda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dental students' perceptions of digital and conventional impression techniques A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Dent Educ]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1227-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patzelt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SBMM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamprinos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stampf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Att]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The time efficiency of intraoral scanners an in vitro comparative study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Dent Assoc]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>145</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>542-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macarthur IV]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RX]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GO]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macarthur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RX]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GO]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>110</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>420-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GO]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy in the digital workflow From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>749-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alkumru]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of digital vs conventional implant impression approach a three-dimensional comparative in vitro analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>792-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>113</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>509-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Özcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Rus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pradíes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Implant Dent Relat Res]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>e54-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ajioka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kihara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odaira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kobayashi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Examination of the position accuracy of implant abutments reproduced by intra-oral optical impression]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bencharit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS One]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kojima]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saraceni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CHC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bassolli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balducci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Özcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital impression techniques for implant restorations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Prosthodontics]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>e530-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Betensky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gianneschi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GO]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>715-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alsharbaty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MHM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alikhasi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zarrati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shamshiri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A clinical comparative study of 3-dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>e902-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gherlone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capparé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vinci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gastaldi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Conventional versus digital impressions for "all-on-four" restorations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>324-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schepke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meijer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HJAA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kerdijk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cune]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>114</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>403-406.e1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Joda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brägger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures a randomized crossover trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>e185-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wismeijer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Genuchten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reijers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1113-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
