<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0034-7507</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Cubana de Estomatología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Estomatol]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0034-7507</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Ciencias Médicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0034-75072022000200012</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Consentimiento informado en radiología odontológica: un asunto pendiente]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Informed consent in dental radiology: a pending matter]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paredes Cruz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leslie Romina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guerrero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maria Eugenia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Facultad de Odontología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lima ]]></addr-line>
<country>Peru</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Facultad de Odontología Departamento de Estomatología Médico Quirúrgico]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lima ]]></addr-line>
<country>Peru</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0034-75072022000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0034-75072022000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0034-75072022000200012&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción:  En el ámbito odontológico es muy común el uso de radiografías intraorales, extraorales e incluso de tomografías computarizadas volumétricas. Las radiografías intraorales presentan una baja dosis de radiación en comparación con las tomografías computarizadas volumétricas que pueden emitir una mayor dosis de radiación con cierto grado de riesgo para los pacientes. A pesar de que se conoce sobre la importancia del uso del consentimiento informado y los riesgos durante estos procedimientos, muy poco se ha reportado sobre la utilización del consentimiento informado en radiología oral y maxilofacial.  Objetivo:  Analizar los beneficios y los retos de usar el consentimiento informado en radiología odontológica.  Comentarios principales:  Actualmente, no existe un consenso claro en la comunidad odontológica sobre si se debe obtener el consentimiento informado del paciente antes de que se someta a un examen de imagen con radiación ionizante. Su aplicación de manera repetitiva o prolongada podría afectar al paciente a largo plazo.  Consideraciones globales:  Existe un consenso universal en resaltar la importancia del consentimiento informado en todo el ámbito de la salud. Sin embargo, en la práctica, su realización puede conllevar ciertas dificultades, tales como la identificación del responsable de su realización, el tiempo que lleva ejecutarla y la preocupación por causar un miedo innecesario en el paciente. Si estas dificultades logran ser superadas, podremos ver los beneficios de tener un consenso claro para la utilización de un consentimiento informado en el área odontológica.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction:  In the dental field, the use of intraoral, extraoral and even volumetric computed tomography is very common. Intraoral X-rays have a low dose of radiation compared to volumetric CT scans that can emit a higher dose of radiation with some degree of risk to patients. Although the importance of the use of informed consent and the risks during these procedures are known, very little has been reported about the use of informed consent in oral and maxillofacial radiology.  Objective:  Analyze the benefits and challenges of using informed consent in dental radiology.  Main Comments:  Currently, there is no clear consensus in the dental community on whether the patient's informed consent should be obtained before they undergo an imaging examination with ionizing radiation. Its application repetitively or prolongedly could affect the patient in the long term.  Global considerations:  There is a universal consensus to highlight the importance of informed consent in the entire field of health. However, in practice, its realization can lead to certain difficulties, such as the identification of the person responsible for its implementation, the time it takes to execute it and the concern to cause unnecessary fear in the patient. If these difficulties can be overcome, we can see the benefits of having a clear consensus for the use of informed consent in the dental area.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[radiación ionizante]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[protección radiológica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[radiografía dental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[ionizing radiation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[radiation protection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[dental radiography]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdelkarim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jerrold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clinical considerations and potential liability associated with the use of ionizing radiation in orthodontics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>154</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>15-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lurie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Doses, Benefits, Safety, and Risks in Oral and Maxillofacial Diagnostic Imaging]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Health Phys]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>116</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>163-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granlund]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thilander-Klang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ylhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lofthag-Hansen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ekestubbe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br J Radiol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>1066</numero>
<issue>1066</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Möenne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bosch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consentimiento informado en radiología]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Chil Radiol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>44-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Practice parameter on informed consent for image&#8209;guided procedures, Revised 2021]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baheti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thakur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jankharia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Informed consent in diagnostic radiology practice: Where do we stand?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Indian J Radiol Imaging]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<page-range>517-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yeh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Oral Health]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>131</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harvey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frush]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Informed consent for radiation risk from CT is unjustified based on the current scientific evidence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiology]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>275</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>321-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Younger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CWE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Douglas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warren-Forward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Informed consent guidelines for ionising radiation examinations: A Delphi study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiography]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>63-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ukkola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kyngäs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oikarinen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Barriers to not informing patients about radiation in connection with radiological examinations: Radiographers&#8217; opinion]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiography]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>e114-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reitan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanderud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Communicating radiation risk to patients: Experiences among radiographers in Norway]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Med Imaging Radiat Sci]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<numero>0130</numero>
<issue>0130</issue>
<page-range>1-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almohaimede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bendahmash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhafr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Awwad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Al-Madi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of Radiographic Protection by Dental Undergraduate and Endodontic Postgraduate Students, General Practitioners, and Endodontists]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Dent]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>2020</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basheer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albawardi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alsanie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alotaibi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alanazi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alfaifi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Knowledge, Attitudes and Perception toward Radiation Hazards and Protection among Dental Professionals in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oman Med J]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>75-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Javali]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dantu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Attitude and awareness about radiation protection among dental surgeons in North Karnataka: A questionnaire study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<page-range>116-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Younger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CWE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Douglas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warren-Forward]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Medical imaging and informed consent - Can radiographers and patients agree upon a realistic best practice?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiography]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>204-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
