Epidemiological analysis of eosinophilia and elevation of immunoglobulin E as a predictable and relative risk of enteroparasitosis
Análisis epidemiológico de eosinofilia y la elevación de inmunoglobulina E como riesgo relativo y predecible de enteroparasitosis
Dra. Cyntia Cristina Vieira Silva, Dr. C. Renato Ribeiro Nogueira Ferraz, Enf. João Victor Fornari, Dr. C. Anderson Sena Barnabe ]]>
Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brasil.
Introduction: among the intestinal parasites, the helminthiasis occupies a prominent position in Brazil, since it worsens malnutrition and the gives rise to neurovegetative disorders. Helminths like Ascaris lumbricoides, Enterobius vermicularis, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura and Strongyloides stercoralis stand out due to several factors that modulate the immune response of individuals. Among the protozoa are Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar. Parasitic helminth antigens are important to stimulate the production of cytokines such as interleukin-4 and interleukin-5, which act through the induction of IgE synthesis and activation of eosinophils. Eosinophilia is usually detectable in pre-patent period of parasitism, initially linked to B lymphocytes, under the command of Th-2 lymphokines (IL-4 and IL-5), producing IgE in response to initial exposure to an antigen or allergen. Serum IgE high levels occur in tissue migration of larvae or harboring of parasites in tissues.
Objective: to determine the presence of eosinophils and IgE elevation in children with intestinal parasites.
Methods: high levels of IgE and eosinophils were observed in groups infected and not infected (allergic) to calculate the relative risk of intestinal parasites presumptive differentiated between protozoa and helminths and check what values of these indicators are observed in the epidemiological profile of the surveyed population.
Results: the values obtained by calculating the relative risk for eosinophilia, compared with helminths and allergies was 11.71, but when examined by giardiasis compared with other diseases, the relative risk was 0.75. Since the comparison of helminths and giradiase, the relative risk was 27.33. Since IgE and its parameters were appropriate commit Helminth relative risk 0.39; Giardiasis had relative risk 8.18 and Helminths compared with giardiasis had 0.03.
Conclusion: in this study it was possible to observe that helminthiasis is connected with cases of eosinophilia with alteration of IgE, which in turn contributes to the presence of IgE eosionofilia and has an effector response against helminths that provides the expulsion of its larvae.
Key words: epidemiology, eosinophilia, intestinal parasites.
Palabras clave: epidemiología, eosinofilia, parásitos intestinales.
]]>
INTRODUCTION
Enteroparasitoses are a serious problem in public health, especially in the third world countries,1 and they provoke frequent malnutrition and diarrhea, as well as physical and mental problems in children.2 Among the parasitic pathogens more frequently found in human beings, there are the helminths Ascaris lumbricoides, Enterobius vermiculares, Ancylostoma duodenale, Strongyloides stercoralis and Trichuris trichura,3 as well as the intestinal protozoa, such as Giardia lamblia.3 Transmitting these parasites to another host depend on complex epidemiological cycles, on a great variety of beings and on the lack of basic sanitation, making it difficult to control such diseases. These factors demand social actions, as well as public health policies.4 The epidemiological, biological and immunological study of parasite diseases is necessary, in order to contribute more application in early diagnosis and prevention of these diseases. The immunological response caused by a parasite infection is complex and multiple, due to the great metabolic diversity of these beings. Thus, there are consequences of Th1 or Th2 responses, depending on the kind of parasite on the host. In accordance with Machado et al5 giardiasis is a kind of parasite infection that causes intense eosinophilia, as well as the helminths mentioned above.6 However, Melo-Reis et al7 do not agree with this idea and state that the relation between eosinophilia (common in T2 responses) and protozoa is little described on the scientific literature; also, they say it is important to emphasize that not all intestinal parasites especially those that are on the intestinal light are able to induce to eosinophilia, what would not make this biological parameter a good indicator of protozoa parasitosis. On the other hand, in helminthiasis, the parasite antigens stimulate an intense Th2 response, with production of interleukin-4 and interleukin-5, what induce to the synthesis of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophils activation.8 Eosinophilia is generally detectable in the prepatent period of parasitism, that is, its detection occurs before helminths turn into adults and the occurrence of parasite biological forms that can be detectable.9 The function of eosinophils is to destroy some helminths through cellular cytotoxicity that depends on the antibody.10 One of the mechanisms within this process is the reaction started by IgE. Initially, B lymphocytes, directed by Th-2 lymphokine (IL-4 e IL-5), produce IgE in response to the initial exposure to an antigen or allergen.11 In parasite infections, high IgE serum levels appear on the tissue migration of larvae or parasite housing in tissues.12
Eosinophilia and elevation of IgE, however, are not initial indicators of parasitosis, because it occurs in other pathological conditions(ex:allergies). There is no data on literature about serum values of the indicators mentioned, regarding the epidemiological profile of people in our society who suffer from parasitosis, but the occurrence and indication of eosinophilia and IgE high levels in people with such pathologies is wide. Thus, we propose a quantitative analysis on a sample of individuals believed to have enteroparasitosis, of the relative risk (RR) in this condition, as well as of the presence of eosinophilia and elevation of IgE. The aim of this study was to compare eosinophils mean values and elevation of IgE in children with and without parasitosis, obtaining reference values of these biological indicators as a clue of the latency period of enteroparasitosis. Also, intend evaluating the quantitative differences between these immunological indicators regarding helminthiasis, protozoa diseases and other pathologies, analyzing the RR values to the parasitic conditions and eosinophilia, as well as elevation of IgE.
METHODS
This study approaches qualitatively and quantitatively, carried out between June 2009 and June 2010. The sample in this research constituted by 83 exams believed to have enteroparasitosis, performed at the Alpha Clin lab, in São Paulo, Brazil. The variables observed were concentration of eosinophils and of IgE, as well as diagnosis suspect of enteroparasitosis. The data were evaluated through application of descriptive statistics of central tendency, using standard deviation as a measure of dispersion. Besides the description of the values of these indicators, it was performed a test of statistical hypothesis, in which H0 was taken as a null hypothesis (there is no difference in the values of eosinophils and IgE in cases of parasitosis and other pathologies), and H1 was taken as an alternative hypothesis (there are differences between the values observed on the concentration of eosinophils and IgE and the condition of being a carrier of intestinal helminthiasis). The values of eosinophilia and IgE were individually submitted to a test Kruskall-Wallis between the groups with and without parasitic infections. All the statistical tests were carried out considering a significance level of p< 0.05, and a confidence level of 95 % was established as appropriate. In the analyses, we used EPI-INFO 2000 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a software of data tabulation in epidemiology. Available in: http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo). The positive exams were diagnosed by sedimentation coproscopy techniques of Hofman, Pons and Janner,13 and by the Faust method.14 Eosinophils concentration was analyzed by an automated electrical impedance technique, spectrophotometry and optical dispersion (STKS® device), and its reference value in percentage ranged from 1.0 to 4.0.15 The analysis of IgE concentration was made by using an automated technique based on quimioiluminecense (Acess device®), with reference values from 1.31 to 165.3 UI/mL.16 Calculating the relative risk between eosinophilia diagnosis and elevation of IgE with enteroparasitosis (exposed), and eosinophilia and elevation of IgE without parasitosis (non-exposed) is going to be made in a 2x2 table, following the models proposed by Pereira (2007), as in the table 1 and 2. The relative risk is going to be calculated according to the formula (A/A+B)/(C/C+D), where A are the sick and B are the healthy within the exposed groups; and C (sick) and D (healthy), within the non-exposed group.17
The variances in median of concentrations are on table 3. ]]>
Information that could identify the patients or the laboratory where the exams were carried out was hidden. This work was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research of the institution where it was carried out, for it was in accordance with the policies stated by Resolution 196/96 of Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq/Brasil). Also, for obtaining such results, other causes of eosinophilia and IgE were excluded. Because of random action, there is a variety of disorders associated with eosinophilia,10 corroborating Melo-Reis et al, who suggest there was no association between giardiasis and eosinophilia.7
RESULTS
The values obtained calculating RR to eosinophilia, comparing helminthiasis to other pathologies, was 11.71. When comparing giardiasis to allergies, RR was 0.75. Between helminthiasis and giardiasis, RR was 27.33.
Besides, parameters of normality or IgE elevation and their respective RR to the configurations helminths and other pathologies were 0.39. Concerning giardiasis and allergies, RR was 8.18; and when helminthiasis and giardiasis were compared, RR was 0.03.
DISCUSSION ]]>
Helminthiasis are well defined when we describe cases of eosinophilia and IgE alteration. Eosinophils and IgE are part of the effector response against helminths, what contributes to release the larvae.18,19 Comparing the medians of parasitosis carriers and non-carriers, Kruskall-Wallis test showed, at the established levels, significantly greater relations between the condition of a carrier and the elevated levels of eosinophils and IgE, with the same parameters, in non-carriers of parasitosis.A few works demonstrated that Giardia lamblia is able to induce an immunological response with elevation of eosinophils.7,10,11 From the data presented in this work, we observed that patients with giardiasis may present normal values of eosinophils, which confirmed Melo-Reis,7 Fontenele et al,10 and Rosário et al,11 but contradicted Machado et al.6
Analyzing RR, we noticed relevance in eosinophilia as a remarkable factor of association (between the events "pathology" and "elevation of indicators"): in helminthiasis and giardiasis, of 27.33 times; in helminthiasis and other pathologies, RR is 11.71 times; and in giardiasis and in other pathologies, RR is only 0.75, which is higher than 1.0 and, thus, constitute a risk factor, in accordance with Pereira.17 The elevation of IgE did not show relevance between helminthiasis and giardiasis (0.03), between helminths and other pathologies (0.39), but presented risk between giardiasis and other pathologies (8.18). In its turn, IgE proved to be a better indicator to giardiasis than to helminthiasis, partly confirming Machado et al.6
Regarding the hypotheses, we deny H0 and noticed a more remarkable difference in the RR of these indicators between parasitosis than in other diseases; however, we accept H1, in which there are statistical differences of RR between helminthiasis carriers and the elevation in the mentioned indicators.
Patients with parasitosis vary in their clinical condition, as asymptomatic and symptomatic, altering the polymorphic form of these diseases. They present diarrhea, weight loss, among other manifestation, or they do not present any important symptomatology for a long time.18 Thus, eosinophilia is a highly important hematological parameter, and it should be considered when approaching and assessing a patient who presents it, for it suggests intestinal parasitosis, specifically prepatent helminthiasis. Also, the association of this indicator with the condition of the carrier should be observed.
In this study, it was possible to observe that helminthiases are associated with cases of eosinophilia. The values observed can indicate helminth infections (RR) and they are very different from other pathological conditions. This study is highly important for public health, for enteroparasitoses are among its main problems. Their diagnosis depends on a laboratorial structure and experienced professionals with biological information regarding the immunological system. However, we accept that the number of individuals in this study is not sufficient to a good analysis, although it is a good tool for new researches on Immunology, parasite biology and public health.
]]>
REFERENCES1. Ludwig KM, Frei F, Álvares Filho F, Ribeiro Paes JT. Correlação entre condições de saneamento básico e parasitoses intestinais na população de Assis, Estado de São Paulo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32(5):547-55.
2. Ferreira CB, Marçal Junior O. Enteroparasitoses em escolares do Distrito de Martinésia, Uberlândia, MG: um estudo piloto. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1997;30(5):373-77.
3. Biscegli TS, Romeia J, Candido AC, Santos JM, Candido ECA, Binottro AL. Estado nutricional e prevalência de enteroparasitoses em crianças matriculadas em creches. Rev Paulista Pediatri. 2009;27(3):289-95.
4. Ferreira MU, Ferreira CS, Monteiro CA. Tendência secular de parasitoses intestinais na infância na cidade de São Paulo (1984-1996). Rev Saude Pública. 2000;34(6):73-82.
5. Fontes G, Oliveira KKL, Oliveira AKL, Rocha EMM. Influência do tratamento específico na prevalência de enteroparasitoses e esquistossomose mansônica em escolares do município de Barra de Santo Antônio, AL. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003;36(1):625-8.
6. Machado RLD, Figueiredo MC, Frade AF, Kudo MD, Sila Filho MG, Póvoa MM. Comparação de quatro métodos laboratoriais para diagnóstico da Giardia lamblia em fezes de crianças residentes em Belém, Pará. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2001;34(1):91-3.
7. Melo-Reis MPR. Correlação entre eosinofilia e protoparasitose por Giardia lamblia em crianças. Rev Bras Anal Clin. 2007;39(3):237-9.
8. Medeiros D, Silva AR, Rizzo JA, Motta ME, de Oliveira FHB, Sarinho ESC. Nível sérico de IgE total em alergia respiratória: estudo em pacientes com alto risco de infecção por helmintos. J Pediatri. 2006;82(4):255-9.
9. Machado PRL, Arruda KL, Rodrigues MAG, Araujo MME, Sales VSP. Mecanismo de Resposta Imune. Educ Medic Continuada. 2004;40(6):289-90.
10. Fontenele ALA, Carvalho PG, Ferreira CHA, Girão AB, Teixeira MJ, Queiroz JAN. Avaliação da dosagem de interleucina-5 e imunoglobulina E em pacientes com giardíase com ou sem eosinofilia. Rev Bras Anal Clin. 2006;38(3):201-6.
11. Rosário NA, Carneiro MF, Ferreira E, Baranski MC. Níveis de IgE total no soro, eosinófilos em crianças com enteroparasitoses: efeito do tratamento anti-helmíntico. J Pediatri. 2007;52(4):209-15.
12. Hoffman W, Pons JL, Janer JL. The sedimentation-concentration methods in Schistosoma mansoni. Puerto Rico. J Pub Health. 1934;9:283-91.
13. Vallada EP. Manual de exames de Fezes Coprologia e Parasitologia. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 1988. p. 201.
14. Zago MA. Hematologia: Fundamentos e Prática. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2004. p. 1081.
15. Soares JLM. Métodos Diagnósticos. Rio de Janeiro: Artmed; 2002. p. 560.
16. Pereira MG. Epidemiologia-Teoria e Prática. 11. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2007. p. 596.
17. Gleich GJ. The eosinophils and bronchial astma: current understanging. J Allergeny Clin Immunol. 1990;85(2):422-33.
18. Moqbel R. Exocytotic events in eosinophils and mast cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29(10):1017-22.
]]>
Recibido: 2 de marzo de 2011.
Anderson Sena Barnabe. Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brasil. Email: anderson@uninove.br ]]>
