<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2079-3480</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Cuban J. Agric. Sci.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2079-3480</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial del Instituto de Ciencia Animal]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2079-34802015000200011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Contribution to the study of soil fertility and its relation to pastures and forages production]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Contribución al estudio de la fertilidad del suelo y su relación con la producción de pastos y forrajes]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Idalmis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sandra]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Ciencia Animal  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[San José de las Lajas Mayabeque]]></addr-line>
<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>211</fpage>
<lpage>219</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2079-34802015000200011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2079-34802015000200011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2079-34802015000200011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Five well differentiated periods are recognize, that show qualitative changes that have taken place in the researches conception developed in Instituto of Ciencia Animal concerning soil fertility and its relation with pastures and forages production. In the first stage, corresponding to 1965-1970, the studies were centered in nutrients identification that limited pastures production and ways for their correction and appropriate fertilization .The fact that N was identified as the main nutrient that limits soil fertility motivated the development of many researches from 1970-1980, related with the effect of N application on the production and pasture quantity used in the country, as well as the best way of distributing this fertilizer to decrease the seasonal effect of pastures production. The influence of nitrogenous fertilization was also studied in different indicators production and animal health and in the action of continuous applications in soils agro-chemicals properties. This type of researches continued developing in 1980- 1990, stage in which was deepened in the high incidence factors to elevate the efficiency of N use, mainly the influence of climatic factors. In this period the researches were also intensified about laboratory methods for the determination of N assimilable contents from the soil and the influence of Cuban natural zeolite in the improvement of the efficiency of N use by grasses. By the middle of 1981-1990 decade researchers related with the role of animals excrements in the soil fertility and pastures production began. In 1983was clear the effect of quantity and distribution of animals excrete on soil fertility and grassland productivity, and in 1984 different ways of use of this resource and synergy of it with the fertilizer are described. With the new paradigm of the agro-ecological conception in the agricultural use, an original approach in soil fertility topic was opened. In this sense more than twelve researches during the years 1995 and 2000 were developed, that were use as database to form a program that allows knowing the result of nutrients balance in different systems of animal production. More recently, from the beginning of this century, researches have been centered in system studies, mainly related with the impact of animal production technologies in grassland and soil indicators. The researches have shown an evolutionary satisfactory development, which have gone in agreement with the imposed necessities by the new scientific tendencies. Furthers researches will allow to propose alternatives for the adoption of technologies that constantly increase the general soils fertility in cattle areas of the country]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se reconocen cinco períodos bien diferenciados, que denotan cambios cualitativos que han tenido lugar en la concepción de las investigaciones desarrolladas en el Instituto de Ciencia Animal en lo que respecta la fertilidad del suelo y su relación con la producción de pastos y forrajes. En la primera etapa, correspondiente a los años 1965 - 1970, los estudios se centraron en la identificación de los nutrientes que limitaban la producción de los pastos y las vías para su corrección y adecuada fertilización. El hecho de que el N se identificara como el principal nutriente que limita la fertilidad del suelo motivó el desarrollo de numerosas investigaciones desde 1970 - 1980, relacionadas con el efecto de la aplicación de N en la producción y calidad de los pastos más utilizados en el país, así como la mejor forma de distribuir dicho fertilizante para disminuir el efecto estacional de la producción de los pastos. También se estudió la influencia de la fertilización nitrogenada en diferentes indicadores de la producción y la salud animal y en la acción de las continuadas aplicaciones en las propiedades agroquímicas de los suelos. Este tipo de investigaciones continuó desarrollándose en el período 1980 - 1990, etapa en la que se profundizó en los factores de mayor incidencia para elevar la eficiencia del uso del N, principalmente la influencia de los factores climáticos. En este período también se intensificaron las investigaciones acerca de métodos de laboratorio para la determinación de contenidos de N asimilable del suelo y la influencia de las zeolitas naturales cubanas en la mejora de la eficiencia de utilización del N por las gramíneas. A mediados de la década de 1981 - 1990 comenzaron investigaciones relacionadas con el papel de los excrementos animales en la fertilidad del suelo y la producción de pastos. En 1983 quedó claro el efecto de la cantidad y distribución de las excretas animales en la fertilidad del suelo y en la productividad del pastizal, y en 1984 se describen las diferentes formas de utilización de este recurso y la sinergia del mismo con el fertilizante nitrogenado. Con el nuevo paradigma de la concepción agroecológica en el manejo de la agricultura, se abrió un novedoso enfoque en el tema de la fertilidad del suelo. En este sentido se desarrollaron más de doce investigaciones durante los años 1995 y 2000, que sirvieron como base de datos para conformar un programa que permite conocer el estado del balance de los nutrientes en diferentes sistemas de producción animal. Desde principios de este siglo, las investigaciones se han centrado en estudios de sistemas, relacionados principalmente con el impacto de tecnologías de producción animal en indicadores del pastizal y el suelo. Las investigaciones realizadas han mostrado un desarrollo evolutivo satisfactorio, que ha marchado de acuerdo con las necesidades impuestas por las nuevas tendencias científicas. Las investigaciones futuras permitirán proponer alternativas para la adopción de tecnologías que incrementen sostenidamente la fertilidad general de los suelos en las áreas ganaderas del país]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[tropical pastures]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fertilization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[recycling]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[systems]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pastos tropicales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fertilización]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reciclaje]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sistemas]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica,   sans-serif"><b>REVIEW</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font size="4" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Contribution to the study of soil fertility and its relation to pastures and forages production</b></font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Contribución al estudio de la fertilidad del suelo y su relación con la producción de pastos y forrajes</b></font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>G. Crespo,</b><sup><b>I</b></sup><b> Idalmis Rodríguez,</b><sup><b>I</b></sup><b> Sandra Lok,</b><sup><b>I</b></sup></font></p> <font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><sup>I</sup>Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Apartado Postal 24, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.</font>   </p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p> <hr align="JUSTIFY">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Five well differentiated periods are recognize, that show qualitative changes that have taken place in the researches conception developed in Instituto of Ciencia Animal concerning soil fertility and its relation with pastures and forages production. In the first stage, corresponding to 1965-1970, the studies were centered in nutrients identification that limited pastures production and ways for their correction and appropriate fertilization .The fact that N was identified as the main nutrient that limits soil fertility motivated the development of many researches from 1970-1980, related with the effect of N application on the production and pasture quantity used in the country, as well as the best way of distributing this fertilizer to decrease the seasonal effect of pastures production. The influence of nitrogenous fertilization was also studied in different indicators production and animal health and in the action of continuous applications in soils agro-chemicals properties. This type of researches continued developing in 1980- 1990, stage in which was deepened in the high incidence factors to elevate the efficiency of N use, mainly the influence of climatic factors. In this period the researches were also intensified about laboratory methods for the determination of N assimilable contents from the soil and the influence of Cuban natural zeolite in the improvement of the efficiency of N use by grasses. By the middle of 1981-1990 decade researchers related with the role of animals excrements in the soil fertility and pastures production began. In 1983was clear the effect of quantity and distribution of animals excrete on soil fertility and grassland productivity, and in 1984 different ways of use of this resource and synergy of it with the fertilizer are described. With the new paradigm of the agro-ecological conception in the agricultural use, an original approach in soil fertility topic was opened. In this sense more than twelve researches during the years 1995 and 2000 were developed, that were use as database to form a program that allows knowing the result of nutrients balance in different systems of animal production. More recently, from the beginning of this century, researches have been centered in system studies, mainly related with the impact of animal production technologies in grassland and soil indicators. The researches have shown an evolutionary satisfactory development, which have gone in agreement with the imposed necessities by the new scientific tendencies. Furthers researches will allow to propose alternatives for the adoption of technologies that constantly increase the general soils fertility in cattle areas of the country.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Key words:</b> tropical pastures, fertilization, recycling, systems.</font></p> <hr align="JUSTIFY">     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>RESUMEN</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Se reconocen cinco períodos bien diferenciados, que denotan cambios cualitativos que han tenido lugar en la concepción de las investigaciones desarrolladas en el Instituto de Ciencia Animal en lo que respecta la fertilidad del suelo y su relación con la producción de pastos y forrajes. En la primera etapa, correspondiente a los años 1965 – 1970, los estudios se centraron en la identificación de los nutrientes que limitaban la producción de los pastos y las vías para su corrección y adecuada fertilización. El hecho de que el N se identificara como el principal nutriente que limita la fertilidad del suelo motivó el desarrollo de numerosas investigaciones desde 1970 – 1980, relacionadas con el efecto de la aplicación de N en la producción y calidad de los pastos más utilizados en el país, así como la mejor forma de distribuir dicho fertilizante para disminuir el efecto estacional de la producción de los pastos. También se estudió la influencia de la fertilización nitrogenada en diferentes indicadores de la producción y la salud animal y en la acción de las continuadas aplicaciones en las propiedades agroquímicas de los suelos. Este tipo de investigaciones continuó desarrollándose en el período 1980 – 1990, etapa en la que se profundizó en los factores de mayor incidencia para elevar  la eficiencia del uso del N, principalmente la influencia de los factores climáticos. En este período  también se intensificaron las investigaciones acerca de métodos de laboratorio para la determinación de contenidos de N asimilable del suelo y la influencia de las zeolitas naturales cubanas en la mejora de la eficiencia de utilización del N por las gramíneas. A mediados de la década de 1981 – 1990 comenzaron investigaciones relacionadas con el papel de los excrementos animales en la fertilidad del suelo y la producción de pastos. En 1983 quedó claro el efecto de la cantidad y distribución de las excretas animales en la fertilidad del suelo y en la productividad del pastizal, y en 1984 se describen las diferentes formas de utilización de este recurso y la sinergia del mismo con el fertilizante nitrogenado. Con el nuevo paradigma de la concepción agroecológica en el manejo de la agricultura, se abrió un novedoso enfoque en el tema de la fertilidad del suelo. En este sentido se desarrollaron más de doce investigaciones durante los años 1995 y 2000, que sirvieron como base de datos para conformar un programa que permite conocer el estado del balance de los nutrientes en diferentes sistemas de producción animal. Desde principios de este siglo, las investigaciones se han centrado en estudios de sistemas, relacionados principalmente con el impacto de tecnologías de producción animal en indicadores del pastizal y el suelo. Las investigaciones realizadas han mostrado un desarrollo evolutivo satisfactorio, que ha marchado de acuerdo con las necesidades impuestas por las nuevas tendencias científicas. Las investigaciones futuras permitirán proponer alternativas para la adopción de tecnologías que incrementen sostenidamente la fertilidad general de los suelos en las áreas ganaderas del país.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Palabras    clave:</b>  pastos tropicales, fertilización, reciclaje, sistemas.</font></p> <hr align="JUSTIFY">     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">INTRODUCTION</span></font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">This paper shows the main results reached at the Instituto  de Ciencia Animal since its creation, which are  related to studies on soil fertility and its effect on grass and forage  production.&nbsp; </span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">STUDIES RELATED TO CHEMICAL  FERTILIZERS APPLICATION</span></font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the first researches the response of most extended pastures in  the country to the application of growing doses of nitrogenous fertilizer were  studied. Doses varied between 0 and 750 kg/ha/year of N. The maximum fertilizer  conversion (kg of DM per kg of N) was produced with the mediation doses of N  application, between 350 &ndash; 500 kg/ha, in spite of the productions was higher,  with the highest application dose (Crespo    1974).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">To specify even more the optimum dose of  N application, experiments with guinea grass (<em>Megathirsus m&aacute;ximus</em>, Jacq.) and pangola grass (<em>Digitaria decumbens</em>, Stent) were carried out, considered  the most extended in cattle areas of the country (Crespo <em>et al.</em> 1975).The  results showed that with 300 kg/ha/ year of N applications approximately higher  efficiency is obtained.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The variations in grass production in a  year decisively influence in the distribution of the availability and quality  of these as animal food and, therefore, in the distribution of milk and meat  during the year.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Experiments with this purpose were developed (Crespo 1976) in Havana  and East to study the effect of different distribution systems of nitrogenous  fertilizations (deferred fertilization) on the annual distribution of yields of  pangola and guinea grass. In both grasses doses of 200  and 400 kg/ha of N were    applied.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The higher yield percentage in the dry  season was get when fractioning the whole fertilizer from November to April,  with irrigation. However, guinea produced more uniform yields in Havana, with  the application of 20% in the rainy season (May to October) and 80% in the dry  one. In East this same system was applied or it was fractioned per cut all  year. Pangola produced more uniform yields in Havana,  with the 20-80 % and 40-60 % systems. In East the 20-80 % system was applied.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Another group of experiments (Crespo <em>et al.</em> 1974) were  carried out for studying the influence of basal application of phosphorous and  potassium fertilizer on the recovery percentage of the nitrogenous fertilizer  by grasses. For this, two levels of P+K (75+200 and150+400 kg/ha/year) and several doses of N (0. 150, 300, 450 and 600 kg/ha/year)  were applied in pangola grass. The higher N recovery  (approximately 60%) was achieved with150 kg/ha of N, plus 150 and 400  kg/ha/year of P and K, respectively.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">An interesting aspect for controlling  the nitrogenfertilization on grasses is the selection  of appropriate analytic methods for the N determination in the soil. To compare  the effectiveness of different agro-chemical methods the procedure described by  Geist <em>et al.</em> (1970) and Dinchev (1972) was  fallowed, that consists on determining the relation between the annual dry  matter yield or the grass N extraction and N level assimilable  in the soil. With this purpose the fallowing methods and determination variants  of N assimilated of soil were compared: 1) N in initial form of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>  + NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> (cited by Dinchev <em>et  al.</em> 1968); 2) N in alkaline hydrolysis at 40 &ordm;C during 24 hr, with NaOH at 0.05, 0.25,  0.50, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.25 N (Cornfield 1960 modifications); 3) N in&nbsp; acid hydrolysis at room temperature&nbsp;  during 16 and18 h, with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> a 0.04 and 0.5 N (Tiurin and Kononova 1935); 4) N  in organic matter (Walkley and Black, cited by  Jackson 1970). Determinations were made in duplicate and the average was  accepted when the relative error&nbsp; was lower to 10%.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">These researches showed that the methods that determine mineral  initial N (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> +NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>) and the  organic matter level, get the highest adjustments, with quadratic and cubic  equations, respectively (Cuesta and Crespo 1988).</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It has been explained that continuous application of nitrogenous  fertilizers can notably influence on some agrochemical soil properties. To  study this effect, a research in a brown soil without carbonates was carried  out, in which 400 and 800 kg of N/ha/year was continually applied in a forages  area for five years (Aspiolea and Crespo 1974).&nbsp; At the end of the fifth year of these  applications, an increase of hydrolytic acidity and decrease of K, P and Mn available was demonstrated, as well as an increase of Fe  and Cu contents. On the other hand, the Ca<sup>++</sup>,  Mg<sup>++</sup>, Zn and Mo contents did not vary.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In another experiment, conducted in a typical red ferrallitic soil, the continuous application of     <br>   50 kg N/ha/cut during two years in a forage area decreased the pH and P, K, Mg,  Na contents (Ramos and Curbelo 1978).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The soil acidity increase, due to the application of high nitrogen  fertilizer dose, has produced yield decreases of some species, as guinea and  coast cross bermuda, while pangola and brachiarias (<em>Brachiaria decumbens</em>, <em>Brachiaria brizantha</em>)  seems to accept this conditions (Aspiolea and Arteaga  1976). The adaptations of plants to a high or low pH are, considerably, the  result of changes&nbsp;&nbsp; in the absorption  selection and translocation of particular ions.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the Cuban soil and climate conditions, nitrogenous fertilizers  applied to culture, including grasslands, have generally shown, high N losses,  so in most of cases, the recovery has not exceeded 50% (Cuesta 1986).This fact,  join to the incessant increase in these fertilizers price, shows the necessity  to find methods that increase it efficiency, such as the evaluation of new  fertilizers types and more efficient application techniques.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The natural zeolite (aluminum and silicate minerals) has attracted  some researches attention, due to they improve the fertilizers effectiveness.  This is attributed, mainly, to their high capacity of cationic exchange and  their affinity and selectivity for NH4.To check these qualities a  research was conducted in which the zeolite dose&nbsp; effect was determined on the N efficiency (as  urea) applied to <em>Brachiaria decumbens </em>grass in a typical red ferrallitic  soil&nbsp; (Crespo 1989).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">There was an increase in the efficiency  use of the N applied, when zeolite dose was increased. It was produce 40 g of  DM per g of N when 180 g of zeolite was applied, in comparison with&nbsp;&nbsp; only 18 g of DM per g of N, when this  product was not applied. The N extraction by the higher grass was increased  when increasing zeolite dose in the second and fourth cut and in the total  extraction. </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">When studying the effect of N dose on  the yield and chemical composition of guinea grass and the mineral composition  of bulls blood serum (Brown Swiss X Zeb&uacute;), Crespo <em>et  al.</em> (1981) found that grass yield significantly increase&nbsp; up to 500g N/ha/year      (21 t/ha/year DM), although P content had a marked decrease. The nitrate  content in grass significantly increases, when more than 500 kg/ha/year of N was applied, with  higher values at 15 d of regrowth. The increase of N dose decrease the P and K  concentration in the animal blood serum, but the Ca,  Mg and Na content was not affected. The LW average gain per animal was 144kg in  the non fertilized grass and 235kg with N<sub>250</sub> fertilization.  It was concluded that can have high safety for feed animal health with the  application of      250 kg N/ha/year, fractioned in four applications. </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">STUDIES RELATED TO THE ORGANIC  MANURE AND MINERAL - ORGANIC FERTILIZERS</span></font></strong></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Generally, mineral fertilization has represented a high cost  percentage of forage production in the world. That is why, researches to know  the possibility to use organic manure were carried out, mainly from cattle  manure, and other organic wastes of the agriculture, as complement and even as  substitute&nbsp; of chemicals fertilizers.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In red ferrallitic soils some experiments  were carried out to know the possibility to supplement or substitute chemicals  fertilizers by organic manure from different sources for the intensive forage  production. In a first experiment (Crespo and Oduardo  1986) was studied the effect of cattle manure dose (0, 25 and 50 t/ha/year) and  N dose (0 and 60 kg/ha/cut) on the establishment and efficiency of N use in  king grass forage (<em>Pennisetum purpureum</em> cv. king grass), as well as their effect on  the OM content and soluble N in the soil.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the establishment cut, three months after the sowing, forage  yield was significantly increased with      25 t/ha of manure. Leaves yield in dry base showed significant interaction with  the studied factors and was found that the higher value (7.6 t/ha) was obtained  with 50 t/ha of manure plus&nbsp;&nbsp; 60 kg  N/ha/cut. In this study, the N conversion efficiency (kg DM/kg N) was increased  with the amount of manure dose and it was of 33.33, 44.9 and 56.7 kg DM/kg N  for 0. 20 and 50 t/ha of manure, respectively. The application of 50t of manure  and    60 kg N/ha/cut (240 kg N/ha/year) increased the OM and N contents of the soil  at the end of the experiment, in depths of 0-15 and 15-30 cm.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The higher OM and N contents in the&nbsp;  soil, due to the high manure dose application, joined to nitrogenous  fertilizer, seems to favor forage radicular activity and, therefore, to improve  nutrition.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In another experiment in a typical red ferrallitic soil, the effect of applying cattle manure and  mineral fertilizer on king grass forage yield and in the chemical soil  composition to longer period was studied (Crespo and Arteaga 1986).The yield that was obtained with  the higher chemical fertilizer dose did not statistically differ of the  treatments in which the fertilizer decreased and 40 t/ha of manure was applied  .The soil pH was not affected by the treatments, but they significantly  increase the OM, N, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O assimilable contents. Data showed that 40 t/ha manure dose  allowed to practically substitute the effect of the dose half of chemical  fertilizer that was usually recommended to apply to this forage under  irrigation conditions. </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It is considered that erects species from Pennisetum  genus are extremely potassium extractors and, therefore, markedly respond to  its application in many soils (Herrera and Ramos 1990).These authors informed  that an appropriate application of this element extend the productive life of  forage field and maintain&nbsp; more steady  yields.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">For similar soil and climate conditions, the experimental results  showed, firstly, that is possible to reduce in a half the chemical fertilizer  dose that requires this forage by means of 40 t/ha of cattle manure application  in the first year and, secondly, that will be necessary to look after the  potassium requirement during the exploitation years.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Later on the obtaining of  organic-mineral fertilizersis beginning to study.  First the effect of different excreta-zeolite proportions on the yield and  chemical composition of guinea likoni (<em>Megatyrsus maximus</em>)  was evaluated (Rodr&iacute;guez and Crespo 1994) and it was determined that 4:1 of  feces-zeolite proportion allows to achieve higher efficiency of the feces  applied. Doses between 25 and 50 t/ha of manure were recommended.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">STUDIES RELATED TO NUTRIENT  RECYCLING</span></font></strong></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">If it is taking into account that most of the papers published about  this topic are from temperate and sub-tropical areas and, many times, under  controlled conditions, the study of dung distribution by cattle in tropical  grasslands and nutrients recycling by means of them, constitutes a topic of  interest and actuality for the tropic. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In researches developed in the Instituto  of Ciencia Animal (Crespo 2013), dung deposited by  cow in star grass (<em>Cynodon nlemfuensis</em> cv. paname&ntilde;o) had  diameters that were in a narrow range (23-26 cm), for 25.8 cm average value.  Each cow deposited ten excretions as average in every grazing rotation, with  dry weight of 0.29 kg each one.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The analysis carried out to the dung showed that N mean content was  1.52% and the average DM content 15.9% (Rodr&iacute;guez and Crespo 1997). From these  observations, was considered that, as average, each cow deposited a dung of  1.72 kg (b. fresh) every 1.5h of grazing, or is the same, an average of 13  dung, with    20.6 kg of total weight during 18 h of grazing. This shows that the 40 cows  that grazing in the paddock defecated 840 dung, which weighed 1.64t in the two  stayed days of each rotation.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The high (HF) and medium (MF) fertility  spots of grass take small areas in the grassland, with values of 3.2 and 3.6 %,  respectively. The grass weight per m<sup>2</sup> was significantly high in HF  and MF spots, in comparison with low fertility (LF) areas, but only represents  17% of the total paddock availability. (Crespo 2013).</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the previous research, the higher N and P concentration of grass,  as well as the higher DM yield in the designed high fertility spots HF&rdquo;  regarding to those of low fertility LF&rdquo; show, without doubts, the influence of  dung and urinations in this areas. Nevertheless, the higher N and K values, as  well as the lower P value in the grass of HF areas, in comparison with MF,  allowed deducing that the first ones were produced by urinations and the second  ones, by dung.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It was also stidied how dung disappearance  is producing in the grassland (Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et al.</em> 1997).In all cases; the  data of disappearance rate had better fit to the quadratic regression model.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The higher values of dung disappearance rate, in the first 30 days  of deposited in June, July, August and September, compared with those deposited  in May and October, were corresponded&nbsp;  with the months of more rain and higher temperature. The erosive effect  of rains during the first days of dung deposition notably accelerates its  decomposition process and favorable conditions are created for higher activity  of the soil biota in the dung.&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The speed of dung deposition during dry season was slower than in  the rainy season, therefore the incorporation of recycled nutrients by this way  should be lower. While the dung deposited in the months of rainy season lost  among 20-70 % of initial weight in the first 60d, in the dry season, only lost  between five and 30% at 90 days. This happens this way, mainly, because dungs  are encrusted in this period, principally, due to the humidity lack.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The higher speed of dung depositions in the rainy season show that  the incorporations of nutrients to the soil starting from them happens faster  than in dry season and, therefore, its effect on the grass is quicker in this  period. This reveals that large feces volumes that are accumulated in the dairy  shade buildings should be applied in grazing or forage areas during this season  of the year, what will make more efficient the incorporation of nutrients that  they contain to the soil.&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The chemical composition of a great group of cattle dungs in dry and  rainy seasons was investigated by Crespo <em>et al.</em> (1998) and Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et  al.</em> (2005a).In a general way, nutrients contents vary with the season of  the year and majority, except Ca, show high values in  the rainy season.</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">This way, N content was 29.5 %, higher in dungs that were deposited  in the rainy season. The dispersion statistics showed that in this season the  samples presented values nears to the mean. P and Mg showed similar  performance. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The K concentration was 57 % higher in rainy season, with wider and  notably more dispersed range regarding the dry season. However, the Ca content and DM percentage were lower in the rainy  season.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The results show that the dungs that were deposited by the cows in  the dry season were relatively poor in water and nutrients regarding to what  was found in the rainy season.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">A high concentration of K in the urine was found, whose value was  1.7 times higher than the N, while the P content showed lower concentration (Crespo    2013).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The effect of dung on the grass yield was stated up to 15 cm outside  its edge and, in occasions, this also happen up to 30 cm. The higher effect was  founded when the dung was deposited in July (599.82 vs. 256.39 g/m<sup>2</sup>).Urine  effect on the grassland yield was positive in all deposition months and all  samples dates. Those deposited on January and March increase the yield, still  100d after applied. The most market effect took place I on July and, in any  case, its influence was showed beyond the physical area, initially covered by  it (Rodr&iacute;guez 2001).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The dungs did not exert effect on the grass N and P contents, while  the K content was increased at 60 and 120 d of having deposited on January and  at 60d on March. The grass Mg content was not affected by the dung, while that  of Ca was increased at 120d of having been deposited  on January (Rodr&iacute;guez 2001).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It was observed that N was higher in the grass that grew on the  urine in the samplings made 60 d after having deposited on January, March and  July, while this urination increased the grass K content in all samplings and,  in many cases, the influence was showed beyond the border physically taken by  it (Crespo, 2013).The influence of the urine in the grass yield was not only  more evident, but also more durable than the one produced by the dung. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the soil, N was significantly  increased by both types of excretions, when the deposition was carried out on  July, while in all cases K content was higher in the covered soil by the urine  and in P did not influence any of these excretions. The pH and Ca did not vary between treatments, but Mg and OM increased  in the depositions on July and March, respectively (Crespo 2013).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The amount of ammonia losses of the feces and urine of daily cows,  deposited on the grassland in January, March and June, was also stidied (Crespo <em>et al.</em>  1997).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In these three experimental periods, the  data showed better adjustment to the Gauss Function in case of dungs, with R<sup>2</sup>  values of 0.89, 0.88 and 0.89 and to the Logarithmic model in Quadratic  Function, in case of urine. Their R<sup>2</sup> values were 0.86, 0.89 and 0.61  for the first, second and third experiments, respectively.</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In each experiments, the volatilized ammonia from the dung was low  in the first days(less than 1 kg/ha/d), and gradually increased , up to 4  kg/ha/d&nbsp; at 8-10 days in the second  experiment and 2 kg/ha/d&nbsp; at 8 days&nbsp; in the first and third&nbsp; experiments, respectively. Later, the values  slowly decreased with the time and were not detected after 23days in all cases.  The total of volatilized ammoniac-N by dungs was 25.5, 41.8, and25.5 kg/ha in  the first, second and third experiments, representing 2.5, 4.1 and 2.5 % of the  total N applied with the dejections, respectively.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In each of the urine experiments, the volatilized NH<sub>3</sub> in  the first days varied from 2.95 to 4.77 kg/ha/d, and gradually decreased, up to  disappearing from 15 d. The total of volatilized ammoniac-N per urine spot was  of 22.3, 22.9 and 21.9 kg/ha in the first, second and third experiments,  representing 1.8, 1.9 and 1.8 % of the total N applied, respectively.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Another important way of nutrients entry in grassland soils is the  litter. Indeed, the return of vegetables nutrients to the soil through the  grassland litter can, in occasions, to be higher than the returned by animal  feces. This happens this way when the grass percentage use by ruminants in  grazing is of the order of 40 &ndash; 60 %, what is common to happen under medium  production conditions. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">This nutrients return to the soil and recycling subsequent, vegetable  consumption way, can be use by means of grasses  species selection that produce high litter quantity of easy decomposition, with  an animal management that allows an appropriate accumulation of it. This can be  managed in such way that is possible to synchronize nutrients supply to the  soil for this way and grass demand.&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo and P&eacute;rez (2000) demonstrated that grasses show low capacity  to accumulate litter than legumes, but anyone exceeded 300 g/m<sup>2</sup>/a&ntilde;o. <em>B. decumbens</em> and <em>C.  nlemfuensis </em>had the higher capacity of litter  production, although still the natural grasses, as <em>P. notatum</em>, <em>D. annulatum</em> and <em>S. indicus</em>,  accumulated up to    180 g MS/m<sup>2</sup>, what is equal to 1800 kg/ha.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The higher litter accumulation by <em>Albizia lebbeck</em> tree, during December to March showed  that, in the first weeks, the main contribution was carried out by this plant  branches and leaves, but these fractions decreased with the time, until pods  constituted 100% of the litter that is produced on March. In total, each tree  produces 80.20 g DM of litter (Crespo and Fraga  2002). In this sense, it is considered that it is necessary to continue  researches about the litter production capacity of the arborous of high  interest for cattle.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">To study how the decomposition in the time takes place of the  produced litter by previous species, many studies with string bags, at random  distributed in each of the grasslands were conducted (Crespo 2013). </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Among legumes, the litter of <em>D. ovalifolium</em> and <em>P. phaseoloides</em>, showed a faster  decomposition    (16 %/month) than&nbsp; <em>S.  guianensis</em> and <em>M. atropurpureum</em>/<em>G.  wightii</em> (15 %/month).</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The litter of perennial legumes showed faster decomposition than the  grasses. This way, at 210 days all legumes litter had disappeared, while, in  similar period of time, there were still in the bags more than 80% of&nbsp; <em>P. maximum</em>, <em>B. decumbens</em> and <em>C. nlemfuensis </em>litter,as  well as 70% of litter of natural grasses and 50.5% of the corresponding to  natural grasses+leucaena.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Practically the grasses litter lasted a year in completely  disappearing, although in that time 30 %, 15 % and 11 % of <em>C. nlemfuensis</em>, <em>P. maximum</em> and <em>D. decumbens</em> initial weight, respectively, stayed in bags.</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In general terms, N and P showed higher values in legumes, while the  relation L/N (lignin/N) was higher in grasses. K showed lower values in the  litter of natural grasses, as well as in the legumes <em>S. gracilis</em> and <em>D. ovalifolium</em>.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The notable differences shown between grass species in the speed of  litter disappearance seem to be closely related with N content and L/N relation  of it. This way, the grasses litter showed, generally, less N and higher L/N  relation than legumes and their litter lasted much more time to decompose. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The obtained results show the importance that the legumes  maintenance has in grasslands ecosystems to increase nutrients recycling  dynamic by means of the litter that they produced, to what is added increase of  the grassland quality and N contribution by means of the biological fixation of  this element. This would help to accelerate the recycling process that commonly  happens in grasslands only compound by grasses. These, as could be observe,  produce litter of lower decomposition capacity and nutrients release, due to  the low N content and to the high lignin/nitrogen relation, what spreads to the  nutrients immobilizations during relatively prolonged periods of time.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The experiments on the litter production and N, P and K return in  grasslands that differ on the species compositions of grasses showed that, in  the diversified grassland, the total litter production was 73% higher than in  the few species grassland (216.2 vs      124.4 t DM).The <em>L. leucocephala</em>/<em>P. maximum</em>, <em>C. cajan</em>/<em>C. nlemfuensis </em>and <em>L. leucocephala</em>/<em>C. nlemfuensis </em>areas were highlight, that contributed 63,  14 and 12 %, respectively of the total litter. In a similar way, the litter  contribute in the grassland with trees    55 % plus N (41.9 vs 27.6 kg/ha), 144 % plus P (11.0 vs 4.5 kg/ha) and 174 % plus K (26.0 vs  9.7 kg/ha) than in the grassland that did not have trees (Crespo <em>et al.</em>&nbsp; 2004). </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The existence of shrub and tree species in the grassland showed to  be favorable, when reaching the highest litter production. This higher litter  quantity represents an important way of nutrients recycling in these systems.  Because it is an important source of nutrients this is available again to the  herbaceous stratum disposition, when the biogeochemical cycle of nutrients  contained in it is completed.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The biomass of grassland roots can contribute to the nutrients  recycling in these systems. In this sense, researches conducted by Crespo and Lazo (2001) showed that roots system in improved grasslands  contributes to the soil between 19&ndash;33 kg N/ha, 3&ndash; 5 kg P/ha and      1&ndash;2 kg K/ha annually. Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et al.</em> (2013) in fifferent  grasslands from Mayabeque province demonstrated that  grasslands with creeping grasses had phytomass  average (area + underground) of    1264.61 g. m<sup>-2</sup>, five times less than the grassland were only was <em>Pennisetum purpureum</em> cv. Cuba CT-115.These results are of great interest, because they show the  organic matter contribution to the soil and their usefulness to predict indexes  and diagnoses of soil resource.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Another way of nutrients entrance, mainly N, in the agricultural  agro-ecosystems is rain water, whose quantity has been investigated in several    countries. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It was found that the ammoniac-N  concentration in the rain water has varied from 0.1 to 10.1 mg/L, representing  0.006 a 1.77 kg N/ha, respectively. The N concentration in nitrate form has  fluctuated between 0.002 and 0.224 mg N/L, equivalent at 0.0002 to    0.0299 kg N/ha. The relation NH4/NO3 has been 324.1 as  average. The obtained results show that the fallen rain in the studied period  contributed 1 kg of N/ha per each 52.5 mm of rain, that is to say, each rain mm  contains 0.019 kg/ha of&nbsp; N (Cuesta and  Crespo 1990).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">SIMULATION MODELS OF NUTRIENT  BALANCE</span></font></strong></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Several models have been developed in animal husbandry that has  looked at valuables aspects to manage systems functioning: litter effect,  radicular system, and spatial distribution of animal feces, gases  volatilization of greenhouse effect, nitrate washes and others. Other important  factors, as food use, energy, consumption, digestibility and live weight of  different animal categories, have also been modeling. Nevertheless, the models  that form the interrelation between the three fundamental components of cattle  system (soil-plant-animal) are limited.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Taking as database the obtained  information in researches conducted in our Institute and other studies made in  the country, Ortiz (2000) developed the RECYCLING model. This model allows, by  means of a computational dynamic program, to estimate N, P and K balance state  in different cattle systems. The analysis, design and to put in practice of the  program, besides considering the predefined requirements in the specifications  of a simulation model, predicted that, with their application, new studies on  nutrients recycling can started, using the same program as a work tool.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">This program allowed the improvement and deepening of the  established knowledge about this thematic and, at the same time, to achieve  higher adjustment degree of the model to the particularities that each unit  cattle presents where it is applied. At the same time, the program constitutes  a useful work tool of feeding technicians and agro-technique of many  enterprise. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The validation of the software in the commercial cattle production  was developed by Rodriguez <em>et al.</em> (2005b) with favorable results in many  cattle units, mostly diary, in the western part of Cuba.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">STUDIES RELATED TO THE EDAPHIC  BIOTA IN GRASSLANDS AGRO ECOSYSTEMS</span></font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In grasslands, the biota carries out an important function in the  organic matter decomposition and nutrients recycling in the different steps.  That is why from 1995, the group begins to study the biota behavior in many  cattle agro-ecosystems. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodriguez and Crespo (1997) and Cabrera  and Crespo (2001) summarized the found results on the functions of edaphic  biota in grasslands, as well as the main ways for its stimulation. Between the  different groups, the earthworm and termites are responsible for the creation  of appropriate conditions of soil aeration and chop of vegetables and animals  materials that compose the organic remains and constitute, for that reason, the  beginners of the biotic activity. The diplopods, on the other hand, feeds  exclusively of vegetables waste in diverse decomposition stages, facilitating  the activity of others decomposers of the trophic chain. The coprophagous fauna, represented by coleopterans, favors the  active feces decomposition in the grassland and accelerates nutrients  recycling, while acari and collembolan pulverize the  organic material and makes it susceptible to the microbial activity. These  micro-arthropods promote growth and the microorganisms and fungi distribution,  carrying the decomposition products to the radicular area.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et al.</em> (2002) researches showed the macrofauna variable behavior in different systems (natural  grasslands, with leucaena and albizia  trees or not and improved grasses grasslands) and demonstrated that the system  with tree species maintain more stability during the time and the biomass is  higher in those&nbsp; that were developed in calcimorphic humic and&nbsp; calcium brown soils.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">It was found higher mesofauna activity  (Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et al.</em> 2003) in 10-20 cm of soil deep on July, that was the  most hottest and humid month in the year. They identified mesofauna  and macrofauna groups. In this case, the coleopteran  larvae and worms were more abundant.</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The previous results show the necessity to carry out experiments to  be able to determine the animal feces contribution in the soil fertility.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">INTEGRAL EVALUATION OF THE SOIL-  PLANT SYSTEM IN      DIFFERENT GRASSLANDS    AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS</span></font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">At the beginning of 2000 decade,  different experiments were carried out for evaluating the impact of bovine  cattle in the soil. These researches were carry out by a multidisciplinary  group constitutes by the Ecology and Systematic Institute, Soils Institute and  Animal Science     <br>   Institute. </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The results of these experiments  allowed proposing a group of indicators (physical&ndash;chemical and biological) to  evaluate the soil integral fertility as well as, a methodology (Crespo <em>et  al.</em> 2006) that allows evaluating technologies impact of bovine production  on the resource soil by means of interpretation tables of values of different  indicators of the soil fertility (O.M, N-total, P-assimilable,  Ca, pH, resistance to penetration, litter,  infiltration, and biological activity).This proposal is based on the radial  figures production that represents, according to values scale, each indicator  state, and allows to estimating the integral fertility degree of the soil in  each cattle unit.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">From 2006, the researchers of the group  were centered in selecting indicators that allowed determining the stability of  the soil-animal grass system in grasslands ecosystems (Rodr&iacute;guez <em>et al.</em> 2008).The main indicators studied were: a) botanical composition, biomass  availability, height, chemical composition, frequency of species appearance,  density per specie, vegetal covering and soil, species appearance and death and  rooting points in the grassland; b) granulometry,  microstructure, apparent density, resistance to penetration, specific weight,  total porosity, N content, assimilable&nbsp; phosphorus, Ca and  Mg, OM, basal breathing, induced breathing, cellulolytic capacity, mesofauna and macrofauna&nbsp; the soil and c) milk production, female      under plan, L/milking cows, L/total cows, L of milk/ha of grass and stocking  rate in the&nbsp; animal    component.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Lok <em>et al.</em> (2007, 2008 and 2009)  studied the selection of soil and grassland indicators in different production  systems of cattle livestock. A considerable group of indicators were determined  that, after subjected to the multivariate statistical analysis, allowed the  grouping of those that should be monitored to know the sustainability state of  each evaluated    system.</span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">This way, in a silvopastoral  system based on leucaena/guinea, Lok <em>et al.</em> (2007) recommended the monitored of the indicators vegetal  covering, soil, base grass density and presence of natural grass in the  grassland component and the distribution of stable aggregates in humid and dry,  structural stability, underground phytomass, macrofauna and mesofauna in the  soil. </span> </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">These same authors (Lok <em>et al.</em> 2008) compared leucaena/guinea system  with another system based on guinea monoculture. In this case they recommended  monitoring grass density, biomass availability, vegetal covering and botanical  composition in the grassland and the structure, resistance to penetration, macrofauna, mesofauna and  underground phytomass in the soil.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">A similar experiment was conducted by Lok <em>et  al.</em> (2009) in a milk production farm with the Biomass Bank technology with <em>P.  purpureum</em> Cuba CT-115.In this case, the selected  indicators for monitor grassland and soil state were similar to those founded  in previous    studies. </span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">In each of these researches were propose tables that contain values  ranges for the selected indicators, which can constitute useful, confidential  and sensitive tools to discern each system state and to take the necessary  measures for their sustainability.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">CONCLUSIONS</span></font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">The presented results demonstrate that  the investigations on the soil fertility in the Instituto  de Ciencia Animal has shown an evolutionary  satisfactory development, that has gone in accordance with imposed necessity by  the new scientific tendencies and with the resources behavior. Further  researches will allow proposing alternatives that facilitate technologies that  constantly increased the soil general fertility in the cattle areas of the    country.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><strong><font size="3" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">REFERENCES</font></strong></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Aspiolea, J. L. &amp; Arteaga, O. 1976.  &lsquo;&lsquo;Fertilizaci&oacute;n con N en tres especies de pastos&rsquo;&rsquo;. In: <em>Primera Reuni&oacute;n Asoc. Cubana Produc. Anim. (ACPA)</em>, La Habana, p. 25.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Aspiolea, J. L. &amp; Crespo, G. 1974. <em>Influencia  de los fertilizantes nitrogenados sobre la composici&oacute;n qu&iacute;mica de un suelo  pardo tropical</em>. Barajagua, Cienfuegos, Cuba: Bol.  Estaci&oacute;n Experimental de Fertilizantes en pastos, 8 p.    </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Cabrera, G. &amp; Crespo, G. 2001. &lsquo;&lsquo;Influence of the edaphic biota on soil  fertility in grassland ecosystems&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>,  35 (1): 3&ndash;8.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Cornfield, A. H. 1960. &lsquo;&lsquo;Ammonia released on treating soils with N sodium  hydroxide as a possible means of predicting the nitrogen-supplying power of  soils&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Nature</em>, 187: 260.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. 1974. &lsquo;&lsquo;Response on six tropical pastures species to increasing  levels of nitrogen fertilizer&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural science</em>,  8: 177.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. 1976. &lsquo;&lsquo;Differed nitrogen fertilization and annual production of  pangola (<em>Digitaria decumbens</em> Stent) and guinea (<em>Panicum maximum</em> Jacq.) grass pastures&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal  of Agricultural Science</em>, 10: 223.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. 1989. &lsquo;&lsquo;Effect of zeolite on the efficiency of the N applied to Brachiaria decumbens in a red ferrallitic soil&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 23: 193.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G. 2013. <em>El Reciclaje de  Nutrientes y su impacto en sistemas ganaderos en el occidente de Cuba</em>. Ph.D. Theses, Instituto de  Ciencia Animal, Universidad Agraria de La Habana (UNAH), Mayabeque,  Cuba, 213 p.    </font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G. &amp; Arteaga, O. 1986. <em>Utilizaci&oacute;n  del esti&eacute;rcol vacuno en la producci&oacute;n de forrajes</em>. La Habana, Cuba: EDICA,  31 p.    </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G., Aspiolea,  J. L. &amp; L&oacute;pez, M. 1986. &lsquo;&lsquo;Nutrici&oacute;n de los pastos&rsquo;&rsquo;. In: <em>Los pastos en  Cuba</em>, 2nd ed., vol. 1, La Habana: EDICA, p. 345.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G., Cuesta, A. &amp; Torres,  V. 1997. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;The volatilization of N-NH<sub>3</sub> in cattle dung during three months. Technical  note&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 31 (2): 141&ndash;144.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G., Febles, G., Pedroso,  D. &amp; Padilla, C. 1981. &lsquo;&lsquo;Effect of N fertilizer on yield and chemical  composition of guinea grass (<em>Panicum maximum</em> Jacq) and mineral content in bulls blood  serum of F1 steers (<em>Brown Swiss</em> x Zebu)&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of  Agricultural Science</em>, 15 (1): 103&ndash;114.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G., Flores, A., Febles, G. &amp; Diaz, H.  1998. &lsquo;&lsquo;Influence of the distribution of dairy cows dung patches on <em>Cynodon nlemfuensis</em> grasslands in the dry season&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>,  32 (1): 83&ndash;89.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. &amp; Fraga, S. 2002. &lsquo;&lsquo;Technical note  on the contribution of litter and nutrients to the soil by the species <em>Cajanus cajan</em> (L.) Millsp and <em>Albizia lebbeck</em> (L.) Benth in silvopastoral systems&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural  Science</em>, 36 (4): 383&ndash;387.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G., Lok,  S. &amp; Rodriguez, I. 2004. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Production of leaf litter  and contribution of N, P and K in two grasslands with different species  composition&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 38 (1): 93&ndash;97.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. &amp; Oduardo, M. 1986. &lsquo;&lsquo;The  influence of bovine feces and nitrogen fertilizer on forage production of King grass (<em>Pennisetum purpureum</em> X <em>Pennisetum typhoides</em>) in a red ferrallitic  soil&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 20 (3): 277&ndash;283.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G. &amp; Perez, A. A. 2000. &lsquo;&lsquo;Mulch contribution to nutrient  recycling in permanent pastures&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 33 (4): 329&ndash;337.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Crespo, G., Rodriguez, I., Otero,  L., Calero, B. &amp; Fraga, S. 2006. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Methodology for the integral  assessment of the fertility state of the soils in a cattle region of Havana&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban  Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 40 (4): 477&ndash;484.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Crespo, G., Rodriguez, T. &amp; Perez, J. 1975. &lsquo;&lsquo;Potential response of  guinea (<em>Panicum maximum</em> Jacq.) and pangola (<em>Digitaria decumbens</em> Stent) to nitrogen fertilization&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 9: 3.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Cuesta, A. 1986. &lsquo;&lsquo;Bases  agroqu&iacute;micas de la fertilizaci&oacute;n N-P-K en &lsquo;pastos y forrajes&rsquo;&rsquo;. In: <em>Curso  Posgrado en Pastos</em>, Cuba: Instituto de Ciencia Animal, p. 38.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Cuesta, A. &amp; Crespo, G. 1988. &lsquo;&lsquo;Laboratory methods to determine assimilable N of the soil for predicting the nitrogen  fertilizer dosage in pasture&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 22 (2): 195&ndash;200.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Cuesta, A. &amp; Crespo, G. 1990. <em>Nota  t&eacute;cnica sobre el contenido de N en las lluvias de la regi&oacute;n del Instituto de  Ciencia Animal</em>. (ser. Pastos), Bolet&iacute;n T&eacute;cnico,  no. 5, La Habana. Cuba: Intituto de Ciencia Animal,  pp. 113&ndash;117.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Dinchev, D. 1972. &lsquo;&lsquo;Transformaci&oacute;n del  nitr&oacute;geno en el suelo y su asimilaci&oacute;n por las plantas&rsquo;&rsquo;. In: <em>Agroqu&iacute;mica</em>,  La Habana: Instituto Cubano del Libro.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Dinchev, D., Cuesta, A. &amp; Echevarr&iacute;a,  G. 1968. <em>Manual de Pr&aacute;cticas de Agroqu&iacute;mica</em>. vol.  1, Univ. La Habana: Unidad de Impresiones Ligeras, 56 p.    </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Geist, J. M., Reuss,  J. O. &amp; Johnson, D. D. 1970. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Prediction of nitrogen  fertilizer requirements of field crops. II. Application of theoretical models  to malting barley&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Agronomy Journal</em>, 62 (3): 385&ndash;389.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Herrera, R. S. &amp; Ramos, N. 1990.  &lsquo;&lsquo;Evaluaci&oacute;n agron&oacute;mica&rsquo;&rsquo;. In: <em>King grass: Plantaci&oacute;n,  establecimiento y manejo en Cuba</em>, La Habana, Cuba: EDICA.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Jackson, M. L. 1970. <em>An&aacute;lisis  Qu&iacute;mico de Suelos</em>. Univ. de Wisconsin, 662 p.    </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Lok, S., Crespo, G., Fr&oacute;meta, E., Torres, V. &amp; Fraga, S. 2007. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Study and selection of sustainability indicators in silvopastoral  grasslands based on <em>Leucaena leucocephala-Panicum  maximum</em>&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 41 (4): 349&ndash;357.</span></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Lok, S., Crespo, G. &amp; Torres, V. 2008. &lsquo;&lsquo;Methodology for the selection of  sustainability indicators of the soil-plant system in grasslands&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban  Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 42 (1): 69&ndash;74.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Lok, S., Crespo, G., Torres, V., Fraga, S. &amp;  Noda, A. 2009. &lsquo;&lsquo;Impact of the technology of biomass bank of <em>Pennisetum purpureum</em> cv. CT-115 on the soil-plant-animal system of a dairy unit with cattle&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal  of Agricultural Science</em>, 43: 297.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Ortiz, J. 2000. <em>Modelaci&oacute;n y  simulaci&oacute;n matem&aacute;tica del reciclaje de N, P y K en sistemas de pastoreo vacuno  en Cuba</em>. Ph.D. Theses,  118 p.    </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Ramos, N. &amp; Curbelo, F. 1978. &lsquo;&lsquo;Sources and  levels of nitrogen on Coastal bermuda  grass (<em>Cynodon datylon</em> L. Pers)&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 12: 307.</font></p>     <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rodr&iacute;guez, I. 2001. <em>Influencia de  las excreciones de vacas lecheras en el agroecosistema  de pastizal</em>. Ph.D. Theses,  Instituto de Ciencia Animal, La Habana, Cuba, 100 p.    </font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodriguez, I. &amp; Crespo, G. 1997. &lsquo;&lsquo;Effect of cattle dung and urine on  yield and N, P and K content of <em>Cynodon nlemfuensis</em> pasture&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban  Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 31 (2): 183&ndash;188.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodriguez, I., Crespo, G. &amp; Fraga, S. 2005. &lsquo;&lsquo;Application of the  software Recylcing of Nutrients in cattle units of the western part of Cuba&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal  of Agricultural Science</em>, 39 (4): 615&ndash;621.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rodriguez, I., Crespo, G., Fraga,  S., Rodriguez, C. &amp; Prieto, D. 2003. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Activity  of the mesofauna and the macrofauna  in dung patches during their decomposition process&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal  of Agricultural Science</em>, 37 (3): 315&ndash;322.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rodr&iacute;guez, I., Crespo, G.,  Rodriguez, C., Castillo, E. &amp; Fraga, S. 2002. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Performance  of soil macrofauna in pure natural grasslands or  intercropped with leucaena for bull fattening&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban  Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 36 (2): 173&ndash;177.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodr&iacute;guez, I., Crespo, G., Rodr&iacute;guez, M. &amp; Aguiar,  M. 1994. &lsquo;&lsquo;The effect of different proportions of faeces-zeolite  on the yield and chemical composition of <em>Panicum maximum</em> cv. </span>Likoni&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 28 (1):  113&ndash;117.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Rodriguez, I., Crespo, G., Torres,  V., Calero, B., Morales, A., Otero, L., Hern&aacute;ndez, L., Fraga, S. &amp; Santillan, B. 2008. <span lang="EN-US">&lsquo;&lsquo;Integral  evaluation and soil-plant compound in a dairy unit with silvopastoral  system in Havana province, Cuba&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</em>,  42 (4): 391&ndash;397.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodriguez, I., Crespo, G., Torres, V. &amp; Fraga,  S. 1997. &lsquo;&lsquo;The rate of decay of cattle dung patches in a <em>Cynodon nlemfuensis</em> grassland. Rainy season&rsquo;&rsquo;. <em>Cuban  Journal of Agricultural Science</em>, 31 (2): 177&ndash;181.</span></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span lang="EN-US">Rodr&iacute;guez, I., Crespo, G., Torres, V. &amp; Fraga,  S. 2005. &lsquo;&lsquo;Effect of the dung patches and the urine on the chemical composition  of the pasture and their effect on the soil under grazing conditions or not&rsquo;&rsquo;. </span><em>Cuban Journal  of Agricultural Science</em>, 39 (3): 341&ndash;350.</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Received: January 1, 2015    <br>   Accepted: February 1, 2015</font></p>     <p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="justify"><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><i>G. Crespo,</i> Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Apartado Postal 24, San José de las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba.    Email: <a href="mailto:gcrespo@ica.co.cu">gcrespo@ica.co.cu</a></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aspiolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arteaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Fertilización con N en tres especies de pastos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<page-range>25</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aspiolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Influencia de los fertilizantes nitrogenados sobre la composición química de un suelo pardo tropical]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<page-range>8</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barajagua, Cienfuegos, Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bol. Estación Experimental de Fertilizantes en pastos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Influence of the edaphic biota on soil fertility in grassland ecosystems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cornfield]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Ammonia released on treating soils with N sodium hydroxide as a possible means of predicting the nitrogen-supplying power of soils]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>1960</year>
<volume>187</volume>
<page-range>260</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Response on six tropical pastures species to increasing levels of nitrogen fertilizer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural science]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>177</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Differed nitrogen fertilization and annual production of pangola (Digitaria decumbens Stent) and guinea (Panicum maximum Jacq.) grass pastures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>223</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Effect of zeolite on the efficiency of the N applied to Brachiaria decumbens in a red ferrallitic soil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>193</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El Reciclaje de Nutrientes y su impacto en sistemas ganaderos en el occidente de Cuba]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>213</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Mayabeque, Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Universidad Agraria de La Habana (UNAH)]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arteaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Utilización del estiércol vacuno en la producción de forrajes]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<page-range>31</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana, Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EDICA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aspiolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Nutrición de los pastos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Los pastos en Cuba]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<page-range>345</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EDICA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[The volatilization of N-NH3 in cattle dung during three months. Technical note]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>141-144</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Febles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedroso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Padilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Effect of N fertilizer on yield and chemical composition of guinea grass (Panicum maximum Jacq) and mineral content in bulls blood serum of F1 steers (Brown Swiss x Zebu)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>103-114</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Febles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Influence of the distribution of dairy cows dung patches on Cynodon nlemfuensis grasslands in the dry season]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>83-89</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Technical note on the contribution of litter and nutrients to the soil by the species Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp and Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth in silvopastoral systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>383-387</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Production of leaf litter and contribution of N, P and K in two grasslands with different species composition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>93-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oduardo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[The influence of bovine feces and nitrogen fertilizer on forage production of King grass (Pennisetum purpureum X Pennisetum typhoides) in a red ferrallitic soil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>277-283</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Mulch contribution to nutrient recycling in permanent pastures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>329-337</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Methodology for the integral assessment of the fertility state of the soils in a cattle region of Havana]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>477-484</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Potential response of guinea (Panicum maximum Jacq.) and pangola (Digitaria decumbens Stent) to nitrogen fertilization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<page-range>3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Bases agroquímicas de la fertilización N-P-K en ‘pastos y forrajes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<page-range>38</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Ciencia Animal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Laboratory methods to determine assimilable N of the soil for predicting the nitrogen fertilizer dosage in pasture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>195-200</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nota técnica sobre el contenido de N en las lluvias de la región del Instituto de Ciencia Animal]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<page-range>113-117</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana. Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Intituto de Ciencia Animal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dinchev]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Transformación del nitrógeno en el suelo y su asimilación por las plantas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agroquímica]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Cubano del Libro]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dinchev]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Echevarría]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manual de Prácticas de Agroquímica]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>56</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Univ. La Habana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Unidad de Impresiones Ligeras]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reuss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Prediction of nitrogen fertilizer requirements of field crops. II. Application of theoretical models to malting barley]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agronomy Journal]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>385-389</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Evaluación agronómica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[King grass: Plantación, establecimiento y manejo en Cuba]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana, Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EDICA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis Químico de Suelos]]></source>
<year>1970</year>
<page-range>662</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Univ. de Wisconsin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frómeta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Study and selection of sustainability indicators in silvopastoral grasslands based on Leucaena leucocephala-Panicum maximum]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>349-357</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Methodology for the selection of sustainability indicators of the soil-plant system in grasslands]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>69-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Impact of the technology of biomass bank of Pennisetum purpureum cv. CT-115 on the soil-plant-animal system of a dairy unit with cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>297</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Modelación y simulación matemática del reciclaje de N, P y K en sistemas de pastoreo vacuno en Cuba]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>118</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Curbelo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Sources and levels of nitrogen on Coastal bermuda grass (Cynodon datylon L. Pers)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>307</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Influencia de las excreciones de vacas lecheras en el agroecosistema de pastizal]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>100</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Habana, Cuba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Ciencia Animal]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Effect of cattle dung and urine on yield and N, P and K content of Cynodon nlemfuensis pasture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>183-188</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Application of the software Recylcing of Nutrients in cattle units of the western part of Cuba]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>615-621</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prieto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Activity of the mesofauna and the macrofauna in dung patches during their decomposition process]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>315-322</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Performance of soil macrofauna in pure natural grasslands or intercropped with leucaena for bull fattening]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>173-177</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguiar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[The effect of different proportions of faeces-zeolite on the yield and chemical composition of Panicum maximum cv. Likoni]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>113-117</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morales]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Otero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santillan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Integral evaluation and soil-plant compound in a dairy unit with silvopastoral system in Havana province, Cuba]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>391-397</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[The rate of decay of cattle dung patches in a Cynodon nlemfuensis grassland. Rainy season]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>177-181</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crespo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="nd"><![CDATA[Effect of the dung patches and the urine on the chemical composition of the pasture and their effect on the soil under grazing conditions or not]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>341-350</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
