<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0864-0300</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0864-0300</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ECIMED]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0864-03002020000300015</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Método simplificado para cuantificar el área oseointegrable de implantes dentales]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Simplified method to quantify the osseointegration area of dental implants]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mauricio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leitao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Javiera]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gloria]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leonardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chaple Gil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alain]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aaf"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile Facultad de Odontología Departamento de Prótesis]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Chile Facultad de Odontología Departamento de Odontología Restaurador]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Chile Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santiago ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0864-03002020000300015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0864-03002020000300015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0864-03002020000300015&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción: Se han realizado muchas investigaciones sobre los implantes dentales, sin embargo, el área oseointegrable aún es un tema poco tratado en la literatura científica.  Objetivo: Diseñar un método para el cálculo del área oseointegrable en la colocación de implantes dentales.  Métodos:  Las áreas de los implantes se calcularon sobre la base de modelos de implantes de tamaño cuatro veces el real, utilizando las fórmulas conocidas para mantos de cilindro, troncos de cono, círculo (entre otras) y aplicando relaciones lineales para las alturas y para los diámetros al cuadrado (asimilación a teoría de modelos). Se emplearon un calibrador de metales, una lupa y un escalímetro. Los implantes fueron divididos en sectores según su diferente configuración geométrica, la suma de superficies permitió obtener el área total del implante. Las superficies se compararon con el área teórica total de los mismos implantes. Luego se extrapolaron los datos para todos los modelos según sus dimensiones particulares.  Resultados:  Las áreas obtenidas para implantes tipo tornillo y tipo cónico (diámetro/largo en mm) fueron respectivamente: 3,75/7 = 129 mm2; 3,75/13 = 234 mm2; 3,75/15 = 270 mm2; 4/15 = 306 mm2; 5/7 = 224 mm2 y 3,5/13 = 143 mm2; 4,3/10 = 166 mm2; 4,3/13 = 215 mm2; 4,3/16 = 265 mm2.  Conclusiones:  La metodología usada en este estudio pareciera ser una buena alternativa para calcular el área final de oseointegración.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction: Many studies have been conducted about dental implants. However, the osseointegration area is a topic not commonly dealt with in the scientific literature.  Objective: Design a method to estimate the osseointegration area in the placement of dental implants.  Methods:  The implant areas were estimated with implant models four times as large as real size, using known formulas for cylinder mantles, cone trunks and circles (among others). Linear relationships were applied for heights and square diameters (assimilation to model theory). Use was made of a metal calibrator, a magnifying glass and a scalimeter. The implants were divided into sectors according to their different geometric configuration. The sum of the surfaces made it possible to obtain the total implant area. The surfaces were compared with the total theoretical area of the same implants. The data were then extrapolated for all the models in keeping with their particular dimensions.  Results:  The areas obtained for screw and cone implants (diameter / length in mm) were, respectively: 3.75/7 = 129 mm2; 3.75/13 = 234 mm2; 3.75/15 = 270 mm2; 4/15 = 306 mm2; 5/7 = 224 mm2 and 3.5/13 = 143 mm2; 4.3/10 = 166 mm2; 4.3/13 = 215 mm2; 4.3/16 = 265 mm2.  Conclusions:  The methodology used in the study seems to be a good alternative to estimate the final osseointegration area.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[implantes dentales, área oseointegrable]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[implantes tipo tornillo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[implantes tipo cónico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[dental implants]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[osseointegration area]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[screw implants]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[cone implants]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schicho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kastner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klingesberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Enislidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Undt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surface área analysis of dental implants using micro-computed tomography]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>459-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gupta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahiya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shukla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surface topography of dental implants: A review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Dent Implant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>66-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quaranta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D'Isidoro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bambini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Putignano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Potential Bone to Implant Contact Area of Short Versus Standard Implants: An In Vitro Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Implant Dent]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>97-102</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Volumetric quantification of bone-implant contact using micro-computed tomography analysis based on region-based segmentation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Imaging Sci Dent]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>7-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sartoretto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Resende]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calasans-Maia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granjeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calasans-Maia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Appl Oral Sci.]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>279-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hsu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Impacts of 3D bone-to- implant contact and implant diameter on primary stability of dental implant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Formos Med Assoc]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>116</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>582-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Claudino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carvalho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zanetta-Barbosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Influence of Implant Surfaces on Osseointegration: A Histomorphometric and Implant Stability Study in Rabbits]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Braz Dent J]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>451-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sartoretto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calasans-Maia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YOD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Louro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granjeiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calasans-Maia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accelerated Healing Period with Hydrophilic Implant Placed in Sheep Tibia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Braz Dent J]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>559-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
