<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0864-3466</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Cubana de Salud Pública]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Salud Pública]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0864-3466</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Ciencias Médicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0864-34662019000200003</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Percepciones de expertos sobre características y habilidades que deben considerarse en la revisión de manuscritos]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Experts perceptions on characteristics and skills that must be taken into account in the review of manuscripts]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dania del Rosario]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Trujillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nelcy]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[del Campo Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Dolores]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crosdale Hunt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rebeca]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lobaina Baile]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Norma]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noa Riverón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Isabel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas Editorial Ciencias Médicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[La Habana ]]></addr-line>
<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0864-34662019000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0864-34662019000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0864-34662019000200003&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción: El experto es figura clave en la evaluación de manuscritos científicos.  Objetivo: Valorar las percepciones de expertos de revistas biomédicas cubanas en relación con características y habilidades que deben considerarse en la revisión de manuscritos.  Métodos:  Investigación descriptiva (septiembre 2013-diciembre 2014) realizada como parte del proyecto de culminación del curso para editores impartido por la Editorial Ciencias Médicas. El grupo analizado estuvo constituido por 57 árbitros. Para su selección se tuvo en cuenta el criterio del director de la revista. La recogida de información se realizó a través de un cuestionario que exploró variables sociodemográficas y relacionadas con el proceso de evaluación. Los datos se ingresaron en una base de datos creada al efecto con el programa SPSS versión 15.0 en español.  Resultados:  Las características identificadas con mayor porcentaje de respuestas e importancia indispensable fueron: actitud ética y responsable: 45 árbitros (82 %) y actualizado en el tema a evaluar 42 expertos (76 %). Las habilidades, con iguales condiciones fueron, detectar errores graves de forma y contenido: 42 expertos (76 %) y ser éticos en sus críticas 38 expertos (69 %). Otras particularidades profesionales, como ser objetivos en el dictamen y detectar errores metodológicos que afectan la calidad del texto, respectivamente, alcanzaron porcentajes menores.  Conclusiones: Los expertos reconocen aspectos fundamentales para la evaluación de los manuscritos, lo que podría influir en el resultado positivo de su labor siempre que lo asuman y apliquen en su práctica, con énfasis en aquellas características profesionales que tuvieron menores porcentajes de reconocimiento.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction: Experts are a key factor in the assessment of scientific manuscripts.  Objective: To assess the perception of Cuban biomedical journal&#8217;s experts in relation with the characteristics and skills that must be taken into account in the review of manuscripts.  Methods: Descriptive research (September 2013-December 2014) carried out as part of the final project in the Course for Editors given by the Medical Sciences Publishing House (Editorial de Ciencias Médicas). The assessed group was formed by 57 referees. It was taken into account the opinion of the journal´s directors for their selection. Data collection was carried out by a questionnaire that explored socio-demographic variables related with the assessment process. Data were submitted in a database created with SPSS program, version 15.0 in Spanish.  Results: The characteristics identified with a higher percentage of answers and essential importance were: ethical and responsible attitude: 45 referees (82 %); and there were updated in the assessed topic 42 experts (76 %). The skills with the same conditions were: to detect serious mistakes of form and content: 42 experts (76 %) and to be ethical in their critics: 38 experts (69 %). Other professional particularities as being objective in the report and to detect methodological mistakes that affect the quality of the text had lower percentages.  Conclusions: Experts can recognize essential aspects for the assessment of manuscripts, which can influence in the positive result of their work as far as they assume it and use it practically emphasizing in those professional characteristics that had lower percentages of acknowledgement.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[revisión por expertos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[revistas biomédicas cubanas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cuba]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[experts review]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cuban biomedical journals]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cuba]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González de Dios]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González-Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alonso-Arroyo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aleixandre-Benavent]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comunicación científica (XII). Conocimientos básicos para elaborar un artículo científico (7): El sistema de revisión por pares (peer review) a debate: fortalezas y debilidades]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Pediatr Esp]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>103-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nassi-Caló]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisión por pares: mala con ella, peor sin ella]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scielo en Perspectiva]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreno Ceja]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cortés Vera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zumaya Leal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Usos, limitaciones y prospectiva de la evaluación por pares]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Interam Bibliotecol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>201-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Packer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[SciELO 20 años y el futuro de las revistas: opine, comente, cuestione]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[SciELO en Perspectiva]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spinak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sobre las veintidós definiciones de la revisión abierta por pares&#8230; y más]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scielo en Perspectiva]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spinak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisión por pares-sobre las estructuras y los contenidos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scielo en Perspectiva]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Glonti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cauchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cobo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boutron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ Open]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>7</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soares de Araújo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revision por pares: un proceso científico en constante perfeccionamiento]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arq Bras Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>e32-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alfonso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El proceso de peer-review en las Revistas Biomédicas: Cualidades de los revisores de Excelencia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Neurología]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galbán Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La revisión editorial por pares: roles y procesos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Inform Ciencias Salud]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>160-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galbán Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La revisión editorial por pares: rechazo del manuscrito, deficiencias del proceso de revisión, sistemas para su gestión y uso como indicador científico]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Inform Ciencias Salud]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>313-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monteagudo Canto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El arbitraje: un proceso poco comprendido]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AMC]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva Ayçaguer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El arbitraje de las revistas médicas, la gestión editorial en red y la calidad de la publicación científica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Salud Pública]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Importancia del arbitraje de las revistas médicas para la calidad de la publicación científica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Med Electrón]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>110-1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díaz Velis Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El arbitraje y la preparación del árbitro, aspectos esenciales del quehacer editorial (editorial(]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[EduMed Centro]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>1-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ávila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Cómo ser un buen revisor para una revista científica?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Ciencias Biológicas]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva Hernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Trujillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[del Campo Peña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crosdale Hunt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lobaina Baile]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noa Riverón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La selección de árbitros desde la perspectiva de directores de revistas biomédicas cubanas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Cubana Salud Pública]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>254-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Council of Science Editors</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scott-Lichter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[CSE's White Paper on promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<page-range>25-6</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Reston, Va ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CSE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cardellach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pulido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proceso de revisión por expertos. Deberes, derechos y conflictos de intereses con los autores y los editores]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fundación Grifos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cejas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Qué significa tener conflicto de intereses? (editorial(]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev argent radiol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Recomendaciones a los revisores]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[J Bras Neumol]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva Ayçaguer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Acerca de una modalidad editorial espuria]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ACIMED]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>73-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viteri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Otra competencia del nuevo docente]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Educación]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spinak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ética editorial: los arbitrajes fraudulentos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[SciELO en Perspectiva]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Guide to Using Sources. A Publication of the Harvard College Writing Program. Harvard Guide to Using Sources: What Constitutes Plagiarism?]]></source>
<year>©201</year>
<month>5</month>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Chicago ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard College]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trainees in peer review. Our experience (editorial(]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Neuroradiol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>211-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strowd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aragón-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park Moon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mentored peer review of standardized manuscripts as a teaching tool for residents: a pilot randomized controlled multi-center study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Res Integr Peer Rev]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La revisión por pares y la selección de artículos para publicación]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Colombiana Psicol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>27-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[&#352;upak Smol&#269;i&#263;]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[&#352;imundi&#263;]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biochemia Med J]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>321-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cobo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cortés]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribera J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cardellach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Selva-O&#8217;Callaghan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kostov]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>343</volume>
<page-range>d6783</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schonhaut Berman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Millán Klusse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Podestá López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisión por pares: evidencias y desafíos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Chil Pediatr]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>577-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
