Respuesta inmune sistémica y mucosal contra Neisseria meningitidis B inducida por estrategia de vacunación simultánea mucosal y parental.
Mucosal and systemic immune response against Neisseria meningitidis B induced by single time vaccination strategy.
González E, Romeu B, del Campo J, Acevedo R, Lastre M, Zayas C, Cuello M, Cabrera O, Balboa J, Nuñez N, Valdez Y1, Fariñas M1, and Pérez O
Immunology Department and 1Animal Models Department, Vice presidency of Research, Finlay Institute.
Abstract
Immunization is one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions ever. Immunization have been helping to reduce child mortality, improving maternal health and combating infectious diseases. In spite of its, undisputed past success and promising future, however, immunization remains an unfinished agenda because of them inadequate coverage. Several factors have been largely responsible of a difficulty to attain immunization coverage and have been recognized as a problems of current vaccines, such as: the number of dose, excessive use of parenteral route, a small number of adjuvants approve for use in human, higher reactogenicity and unavailability against intracellular pathogens, infected or altered cells and scanty feasibility to combined more than one antigen in the same formulation. For bacterial meningitis WHO estimates that 1.2 million cases occur annually and Neisseria meningitidis is the etiological agent in more than 40% of these cases although some meningococcal vaccines are available. To bear in mind these principals problems, a novel protocol for vaccination against N. meningitidis called Single Time Vaccination Strategy (SinTimVaS) is proposed. Using female BALB/c mice, we induce systemic and mucosal immune responses against N. meningitidis with only one parenteral and one mucosal dose at the same time, employing the Finlay Adjuvants derivate from N. meningitidis, AFPL1 and AFCo1, respectively. In conclusion, SinTimVaS could increase the vaccination coverage and reduce the time-cost of vaccine campaigns, adding the possibility to increase the herd immunity by mucosal specific response induction.
keywords: Neisseria meningitidis, SinTimVaS, Adjuvants.
Introduction
]]> Vaccination is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be the most cost-effective strategy for controlling infectious diseases but a successful immunization program can contribute much more than just vaccines (1). Epidemiologically targeted implementation of vaccines has diminished morbidity and mortality from many infectious diseases that previously were scourges and economic burdens (such as measles, polio, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b, meningococcal, and pneumococcal infections) (2). In spite of great successes with these existing vaccines, they are still leading killers, because of they inadequate coverage estimated at: DPT, 89%; TT, 69%; Hep B, 60%; Hib, 22%; Polio, 80%, and Yellow fever, 48%, showing that although these coverages have been increased every year, they are still inefficient (2, 3).In the case of bacterial meningitis the WHO estimates that 1.2 million cases of bacterial meningitis occur annually, with 135000 deaths. In spite of current vaccines, Neisseria meningitidis is the etiological agent in more than 40% of these cases (4).
Several factors have been largely responsible of a difficulty to attain immunization coverage and have been recognized as a problems of current vaccines, such as: the number of dose in the immunization schedule, the excessive use of parenteral route over mucosal route, the inadequate progress in the field of adjuvants for use in human vaccines, higher reactogenicity and unavailability of these vaccines against
intracellular pathogens, infected or altered cells such as malaria and HIV, which rely on cell-mediated immunity and scanty feasibility to combined more than one antigen in the same formulation (5).
For meningococcal vaccines, others factors have been added, like the majority of available vaccines protect against some but not all forms of meningitis, and they provide an efficient systemic immune response modify but not eliminate the nasopharyngeal carriage and with this the disease transmissibility.
To bear in mind these principal problems of current vaccines and in light of the ambitious aim of future vaccines, a novel protocol for vaccination named Single Time Vaccination Strategy (SinTimVaS) is proposed. Using AFPL1 (Adjuvant Finlay Proteoliposome 1, a detergent-extracted of outer membrane vesicle from N. meningitidis B) and AFCo1 (Adjuvant Finlay cochlear structure derived from PL in interaction with Ca2+), we demonstrated that is possible to induce similar systemic immune response against N. meningitidis B than parenteral immunization, but adding mucosal immune response only with one parenteral dose of AFPL1 and one mucosal dose of AFCo1 at the same time in mice.
Materials and Methods
AFPL1. Outer membrane vesicles (called proteoliposome or PL when used as antigen and AFPL1, when used as adjuvant)
were produced at industrial scale under GMP conditions at Finlay Institute, Havana, Cuba (6).
AFCo1. Adjuvant Finlay Cochleate 1 and the incorporation of non-related antigens were carried out at development scale under GMP conditions at Finlay Institute as previously described (7).
]]> Animals: Female BALB/c mice (CENPALAB), 6-8 weeks old and weighing 18-20 g was used to carried out the objectives.Immunization regiments. Balb/C mice (n = 3) were distributed in 3 immunized groups and one of control. The first group was immunized with three nasal (IN) dose of AFCo1 (50 µg in 25 µL, 12.5 µL in each nostril) with 7-day interval. The second group was immunized with two intramuscular (IM) doses respectively of AFPL1 (12.5 µg in 50 µL) with 14-day interval. The last group was immunized with one IN dose of AFCo1 (100 µg in 25 µL, 12.5 µL in each nostril) and one IM dose of AFPL1 (25 µg in 50 µL) at the same time.
Collection of samples. Saliva and serum were collected to determinate anti PL IgA and IgG titres, respectively. Saliva was collected at day 7 after the immunization schedules and serum on day 21 as previously described (8).
Analysis of immune response. Anti PL IgA titers in saliva and anti PL IgG, IgG1 / IgG2a in serum were measured by direct ELISA using polystyrene 96-well plates (MaxiSorp F96; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) as previously described (8). Anti PL IgG and IgA titres are expressed as unit/mL and arbitrary unit/mL, respectively + standard deviation of the mean from three independent experiments. The anti PL IgG subclasses are expressed in optical density units (OD).
Statistical analysis. Significant differences between the means of different groups were determined by a Tukey multiple comparison tests using the Graph Pad Prism 4 Software (CA, USA).
Figure 1. Anti PL immune response induced by SinTimVaS. Balb/C mice (n = 3) were distributed in 3 immunized groups and one of control. The first group was immunized with three IN dose of AFCo1 (50 µg in 25 µL, 12.5 µL in each nostril) with 7-day interval. The second group was immunized with two IM doses respectively of AFPL1 (12.5 µg in 50 µL) with 14-day interval. The last group was immunized with one IN dose of AFCo1 (100 µg in 25 µL, 12.5 µL in each nostril) and one IM dose of AFPL1 (25 µg in 50 µL) at the same time. Anti PL specific IgG (A), and IgG subclasses (C) antibodies titters in serum and IgA (B) in saliva were measured by direct ELISA. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and Discussion
We have been demonstrated in previous studies, the benefits of use our derivates from N. meningitidis B (AFPL1 and AFCo1) in the induction of immune response against this agent (8). Both structures induce an efficient mucosal and systemic immune response with specific IgA response on mucosal secretions by IN rout and specific IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a subclasses responses in serum by all routes, although AFCo1 induces a significant greater mucosal immune response than AFPL1 mainly by mucosal rout (8).
]]> In addition, it has been confirmed for many researches that in general, systemically administered vaccines, although inducing good systemic T cell responses rarely induce optimal mucosal immune responses (9, 10). However others studies had confirmed that parenteral routes can boost the mucosal immune response induced by mucosal vaccination. Many studies combine nasal or/and oral routs with intramuscular routs, using mucosal rout for priming dose and parenteral rout for booster dose (traditional prime-boosts spaced doses) inducing systemic and mucosal immune response (11).In SinTimVaS using the Finlay Adjuvants and combining mucosal with parenteral rout at the same time, both systemic and mucosal immune responses were induced. With this proprietary new strategy of vaccination (12) against N. meningitidis B, one IN dose of AFCo1 simultaneously with one IM dose of AFPL1, induce similar anti PL specific IgG and IgG subclasses antibodies titters in serum than two IM AFPL1 doses or three IN AFCo1 doses, but in addition it induces mucosal specific IgA response (Figure 1).
In conclusion, SinTimVaS induces an efficient systemic immune response as well as mucosal immune response at least in mice.
References
1. WHO-UNICEF, GIVS (Global Immunization Vision and Strategy) 2006-2015.
2. WHO-UNICEF, Global Immunization Data, January 2008.
3. Levine MM and Sztein MB. Vaccine development strategies for improving immunization: the role of modern immunology. Nature Immunology 2004; 5: 460-4.
4. Tikhomirove E, Santamaria M, Esteves K. Meningococcal disease: public health burden and control. World Health Stat Q 1997;50:170-7.
5. Jianga W, Guptab RK, Deshpandec MC, et al, Biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles for injectable delivery of vaccine antigens, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2005;57:391_ 410
6. Campa C, Sierra VG, Gutierrez MM et al. Method of producing Neisseria meningitidis B vaccine, and vaccine produced by method. United States Patent 1997, Patent Number: 5,597,572.
7. Pérez O, Bracho G, Lastre M et al. Novel adjuvant based on a proteoliposome- derived cochleate structure containing native lipopolysaccharide as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern. Immunol Cell Biol 2004; 82:603-10.
8. Pérez O, M. Lastre M, Cabrera O, et al. New Vaccines Require Potent Adjuvants like AFPL1 and AFCo1 Journal compilation
2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 2007;66: 271-7.
9. Kozlowski PA, Neutra MR. The role of mucosal immunity in prevention of HIV transmission. Curr Mol Med 2003; 3:217-28.
10. Mitchell EA, Bergmeier LA, Doyle C, et al. Homing of mononuclear cells from iliac lymph nodes to the genital and rectal mucosa in non-human primates. Eur J Immunol 1998; 28:3066-74.
11. Mestecky J, Michalek SM, Moldoveanu Z, Russell MW. Routes of immunization and antigen delivery systems for optimal mucosal immune responses in humans. Behring Inst Mitt. 1997; (98):33-43.
12. Pérez O, González E, Romeu B, del Campo J, Acevedo R, Lastre M, Zayas C, Cuello M, Cabrera O, Nuñez N y Balboa J. Vacunas Unitemporales. Patent applied OCPI, CU/P/2008/215. November 19, 2008.
]]>
