SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 issue1Inguinal hernia surgery in third age patients: ambulatory and with a short hospitalizationCholecystectomy with local anesthesia as a resource in the elderly author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Cubana de Cirugía

Print version ISSN 0034-7493

Abstract

ARAGON PALMERO, Felipe Jorge et al. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus minimal-invasive hysterectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Rev Cubana Cir [online]. 2011, vol.50, n.1, pp. 82-95. ISSN 0034-7493.

INTRODUCTION. At the present time three types of hysterectomies are used: the vaginal hysterectomy and the minimal-invasive hysterectomy (MIH). The objective of present research was to compare the MIH and the total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in women presenting with benign uterine diseases. METHODS. A systemic review was made and a meta-analysis from the following databases: MEDLINE, EBSCO HOST AND The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only the controlled and randomized studies were selected. The data of all studies were combined and also the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI was used with the Mantel-Haenszel method as an effect measure for dichotomy variables. For the analysis of continuing variables the mean difference was used. In all the comparisons performed the results were obtained with the fix effect and randomized forms. RESULTS. A total of 53 transoperative complications were registered in the MIH hysterectomy versus 17 in the TAH group (RR: 1,78; 95% CI: 1,04-3.05). Postoperative complications evolved in a similar way in both groups without significant differences from the statistical point of view. The blood losses, the hospital stay and the patient's reincorporation to usual and work activities were lesser in the laparoscopy group; however, the operative time is higher when it is compared with TAH (mean difference: 37,36; 95% CI: 34,36-39,93). CONCLUSIONS. Both techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The indication of MIH must to be individualized according to the clinical situation of each patient and these not to be performed in those centers without a properly trained surgical staff and with experience in advanced minimal invasive surgery.

Keywords : Hysterectomy; laparoscopy; laparoscopy surgery; laparoscopy hysterectomy; abdominal hysterectomy.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )