SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue2The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Alternative for their Legal Organization in CubaCharacterization of the socio-environmental conditions of the José Antonio Echeverría Bianchi primary school, in the municipality of Pinar del Río, Cuba author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina

On-line version ISSN 2308-0132

Abstract

VALLE DIAZ, Felipe Rafael. Monopoly and inequality in young people´s access to public universities of Peru. Estudios del Desarrollo Social [online]. 2021, vol.9, n.2  Epub July 01, 2021. ISSN 2308-0132.

The objective if the study was: to reflect, to argue why the exclusive monopoly of vacancies and production of services in basic secondary education, limit and condition the access and inequity of opportunities of for young applicants to public universities in Peru, 2014 to 2020. The research approach was qualitative, case study type, narrative design. It was concluded: The monopoly of the Pre-University Centers in the universities is illegitimate, it is not the function and competence of the major houses of studies, according to the tacit, exposed in the University Law 30220, a Production Center, generates direct income that allows its self-financing; they develop the university functions of extensionism and innovation, from the Research Institutes and/or Centers for the Production of Products and/or Services. Access to the university is through an admission exam, by selection test, the vacancies that are offered in each Admission process per semester, or the total between the fixed 20% are consigned to the University Pre-University Center, out of the 10% for exceptional cases due to equity and social resilience policy. This decision generates the displacement of the competition, due to the extrema opportunity of admission offered by the University Pre-University Center. In addition, it violates rights, conceals inequity, towards young applicants who did not register for preparation in the University Pre-University Center, it does not allow to obtain reliable indicators against the competition because there is no equivalent pair and even the University subsidizes the Center Pre University.

Keywords : monopoly; inequity; access; pre-university center; university law.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )