SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue4Donors' shortage: ethical and social implications in the renal transplantTool to identify, to validate and to certify the competitions, a necessity for the companies of medications author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Correo Científico Médico

On-line version ISSN 1560-4381

Abstract

MULET PEREZ, Agustín M; MULET GAMEZ, Agustín M  and  GONZALEZ FERRER, Jorge. Inappropriate use of the term Syndrome in the Diagnostic Discussion. Similarities and divergences in the criterion of experts. ccm [online]. 2017, vol.21, n.4, pp. 1065-1104. ISSN 1560-4381.

Introduction: there have been cases of misuse of the term syndrome in diagnostic discussion at the University Hospital of Holguin V.I. Lenin, which may be due to several factors. Objective: to identify, according to expert criteria, if there are cases of inappropriate use of the term syndrome in the diagnostic discussion in other provinces of Cuba, its negative repercussion in the medical diagnosis, main manifestations of the inadequate use, probable causes, need of consensus and of conceptual replacement. Method: descriptive observational study with methodological triangulation. Intentional sample of 15 experts from different provinces, assistant or master professors, master, doctor of science or both and specialists of first or second degree on internal medicine, who answered, electronically, a survey with various items and questions, Likert Scale. The survey was statistically validated; the data were processed using the median and quartiles using: anova test, Kendall correlation coefficient and cluster analysis. Results: the majority of experts agreed that there are cases of inadequate use of the term syndrome in diagnostic discussions, its negative repercussion in the medical diagnosis, possible causes, need for consensus with some divergences, among three groups of experts, regarding forms of manifestation, other influential factors and especially on the extension of the syndrome concept, through the inclusion of signs of complementary examinations and their possible consequence in the algorithm of the clinical method. Conclusions: although most experts agreed on the existence of inappropriate use of the term syndrome and other related aspects, the existence of divergences, especially on the conceptual replacement of the term and its repercussion in the diagnostic process, suggests the existence of a heterodox school (minority), an orthodox or traditional school (majority) and an eclectic school, intermediate in number of experts.

Keywords : syndrome; medical diagnosis; diagnostic discussion; conceptual replacement.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License