Background:

evaluation is an essential component of the training process that allows feedback on the degree of compliance with the proposed objectives.

Objective:

to describe the results of the evaluation carried out during the academic training process of specialists in Comprehensive General Medicine in the north-central territory of the province of Villa Clara.

Methods:

a descriptive research was carried out, from December 2020 to January 2021, at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Sagua la Grande. Theoretical and empirical methods were used for the foundation of the research and empirical ones: the analysis of documents: teaching records, reports of oral practical and theoretical exams, written theoretical exams and minutes of subjects grades and graduation exams.

Results:

satisfactory results predominated in the oral practical and theoretical exams within inner examining board, while in the practical, oral and written theoretical exams with outer examining board, the results were not satisfactory. It was found that satisfactory results prevailed in the course or frequent evaluation, contrasting with those of the graduation exam.

Conclusions:

the results of the evaluation during the process of academic training as first degree specialists in Comprehensive General Medicine revealed contradictions in the assessment of the competence and performance of the aspiring specialists, in correspondence with the type of examination applied and the composition of the examining board.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )