SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 issue3Agrometeorological valoration of genetic companies with beef cattle in CubaRenal Lesions Associated to Leptospira spp. Seroprevalence in Pigs at Portoviejo Slaughterhouse author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de Producción Animal

On-line version ISSN 2224-7920

Abstract

LOOR MENDOZA, Ingrid Josselyn et al. Comparison of Two Techniques for Counts of Antral Follicles Larger than 4 mm in Slaughtered Heifers. Rev. prod. anim. [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.3, pp. 26-38.  Epub Dec 31, 2021. ISSN 2224-7920.

Aim.

To compare the efficiency of the ultrasound and direct visual techniques for antral follicle counts, and the morphological characteristics of the ovaries of slaughtered heifers.

Methods:

A number of 102 ovary pairs from crossbred Holstein heifers collected postmortem were included. The study used the ultrasound and direct visual techniques to determine the size and weight of the ovaries, luteal body, and the number of <4 mm >4 mm antral follicles. A simple analysis of variance and the Tukey test at 5% were performed to compare the means of the variables pooled by phase of the estrus cycle and follicular wave. A two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the two techniques and location of the ovarian structures (RO and LO). Additionally, the Pearson test was conducted to establish the correlation between the techniques.

Results:

The study found that the right ovary (RO) weighed 3.21 g more than the left ovary (LO). Besides, 86.27% of animals presented luteal body (LB) with a mean weight of 3.38 g. The size of ovaries, (LB), and > 4 mm antral follicle counts (AFC) performed through direct visual (Vis) and ultrasound (US) techniques were similar (P>0.05), with a high and significant correlation (r=0.75; P<0.001). However, the <4 mm AFC showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between the techniques, whereas the correlation was low and non-significant.

Conclusion:

Ultrasound is a highly efficient tool to assess > 4 mm ovarian structures. However, the correct determination of smaller structures will depend on other additional factors.

Keywords : Echograph; ovaries; follicles; luteal body; cattle.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )