SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 issue63Microscopic description of low-lying properties in 168≤A≤170 Yb nuclei by the pseudo-SU(3) shell model author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  


Services on Demand



  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO



On-line version ISSN 2075-5635

Nucleus  no.63 Ciudad de La Habana Jan.-June 2018


Nuclear Sciences

Cyclotron production of 67Cu: A new measurement of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu, 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga nuclear cross sections

Producción de 67Cu en ciclotrón: una nueva medición de secciones eficaces nucleares de 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu, 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga

Gaia Pupillo1  2  *  , Thomas Sounalet3  , Nathalie Michel4  , Férid Haddad3  4  , Liliana Mou1  , Luciano Canton5  , Andrea Fontana6  , Juan Esposito1  , Adriano Duatti2 

1Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro (LNL), Italy

2Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

3Laboratoire Subatech, IN2P3-CNRS, Ecole des Mines de Nantes, Nantes, France

4GIP ARRONAX, Nantes, France

5Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Padova (PD), Italy

6Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Pavia (PV), Italy


The cross sections of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu,68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga reactions were measured at the ARRONAX facility by using the 70 MeV cyclotron, with particular attention to the production of the theranostic radionuclide 67Cu. Enriched 68Zn material was electroplated on silver backing and exposed to alow-intensity proton beam by using the stacked-foils target method. Since 67Cu and 67Ga radionuclides have similar half-lives and same γ-lines (they both decay to 67Zn), a radiochemical process aimed at Cu/Ga separation was mandatory to avoid interferences in γ-spectrometry measurements. A simple chemical procedure having a high separation efficiency (>99%)was developed and monitored during each foil processing, thanks to the tracer isotopes 61Cu and 66Ga.Nuclear cross sections were measured in the energy range 35-70 MeV by using reference reactions recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to monitor beam flux. In comparison with literature data a general good agreement on the trend of the nuclear reactions was noted, especially with latest measurements, but slightly lower values were obtained in case of 67Cu. Experimental results of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu,68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga reactions were also compared with the theoretical values estimated by using the nuclear reaction code TALYS. The production yield of the theranostic radionuclide 67Cu was estimated considering the results obtained in this work.

Key words: isotope production; radioisotope generators; cyclotrons; cross sections; copper 67


Las secciones eficaces de las reacciones 68Zn (p, 2p) 67Cu, 68Zn (p, 2n) 67Ga y 68Zn (p, 3n) 66Ga se midieron en la instalación ARRONAX utilizando el ciclotrón 70 MeV, con especial atención a la producción del radionucleidos teranóstico 67Cu. El material enriquecido 68Zn se galvanizó sobre soporte de plata y se expuso a un haz de protones de baja intensidad utilizando un blanco de láminas apiladas. Como los radionucleidos 67Cu y 67Ga tienen periodos de semidesintegración y líneas γ similares (ambos se desintegran a 67Zn), un proceso radioquímico dirigido a la separación Cu / Ga fue obligatorio para evitar interferencias en las mediciones de espectrometría γ. Se desarrolló un procedimiento químico simple con una alta eficiencia de separación (> 99%) durante cada procesamiento de la lámina, gracias a los isótopos trazadores 61Cu y 66Ga. Las secciones eficaces nucleares se midieron en el rango de energía de 35-70 MeV utilizando reacciones de referencia recomendadas por el Organismo Internacional de Energía Atómica (OIEA) para monitorear el flujo del haz. Al comparar con los datos de la literatura, se observó una buena concordancia en general con la tendencia de las reacciones nucleares, particularmente con las últimas mediciones, pero se obtuvieron valores ligeramente inferiores en el caso de 67Cu. Los resultados experimentales de las reacciones 68Zn (p, 2p) 67Cu, 68Zn (p, 2n) 67Ga y 68Zn (p, 3n) 66Ga también se compararon con los valores teóricos estimados usando el código de reacción nuclear TALYS. El rendimiento de producción del radionucleido teranóstico 67Cu se estimó considerando los resultados obtenidos en este trabajo.

Palabras-clave: producción de isotopos; generadores de radisótopos; ciclotrones; secciones eficaces; cobre 67


Theranostics is a new treatment strategy that combines therapy and diagnostics, allowing the possibility to select patients that have a good chance to respond to the specific radiopharmaceutical. Among the theranostic isotopesof major interest [1], 67Cu is probably the most promising candidate due to the specific role of copper in several biochemical processes. In addition, 67Cu has been long considered an excellent nuclide for radioimmuno-therapy (RIT), by means of its peculiar physical-chemical characteristics (Table 1). Its relatively long half-life (61.83 h) permits to follow the slow biodistribution of antibodies, the most used bioactive vectors for 67Cu, while its β-emission (mean Eβ- = 141 keV) has a therapeutic effect of short-medium range on the targeted cells. The low energy γ-rays produced by67Cu decay (Eγ = 184.58 keV, 48.6%) [2] allow to follow its uptake, by using standard SPECT or SPECT/CTcameras developed for the 140 keV γ-rays of 99mTc. In recent years the main limiting factor for a more consistent evaluation of 67Cu in clinical trials was its availability. In the framework of the LARAMED (LAboratory of RAdionuclides for MEDicine) [3] project , a collaboration between the ARRONAX facility (Acceleration for Research in Radiochemistry and Oncology at Nantes Atlantique) [4] and INFN-LNL (Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro) started, aimed at investigating the best production routes, based on high-performance cyclotrons,of radionuclides with relevant medical interest, including 67Cu.The accurate knowledge of the cross section is the first step towards the optimization of radioisotope production: acritical analysis of previous data available on EXFOR library [5] showed that there are some discrepancies. In fact, during the proton irradiation of 68Zn target there is the co-production of large quantity of67Ga (half-life 3.2617 d), that as 67Cu decays to the stable daughter nuclei 67Zn. In addition to the similar half-lives, respectively about 62 and 78 hours, 67Cu and 67Ga present the same γ-rays emission with different relative intensities (Table 1). This fact requested a radiochemical process before γ-spectroscopy measurements to efficiently separate Cu from Ga isotopes and get accurate measurements of their activity values.The separation procedure could be a possible source of discrepancy between authors, as well as the use of different target materials (natural versus enriched), manufacturing techniques and selected monitor reactions or not up-to-date decay data.The purpose of this work was to provide a new accurate measurement of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu excitation function in the energy range 35-70 MeV. Highly enriched 68Zn materialwas used and the yield of the chemical process was monitored for each irradiated target.61Cu and 66Ga radionuclides were used as tracer isotopes of the separation procedure, respectively for copper and gallium elements, thanks to their characteristics γ-rays and suitable half-lives (Table 1). New data of the 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga cross sections were also obtained.

Considering the increasing interest of 67Cu in theranostics and the recent availability of compact cyclotrons, the thick target yield for 70 MeV proton beams and fully enriched 68Zn targets was calculated.

Table 1 Nuclear data associated to the radionuclides of interest, extracted from the NuDat2 Database (National Nuclear Data Center, NNDC) [7

Radionuclide Half-life Eγ (keV) Iγ (%)
67Cu 61.83 h (12)

184.577 (10)

208.951 (10)

300.219 (10)

393.529 (10)

48.7 (3)

0.115 (5)

0.797 (11)

0.220 (8)

64Cu 12.701 h (2) 1345.77 (6) 0.475 (11)
61Cu 3.333 h (5)

282.956 (10)

656.008 (10)

12.2 (22)

10.8 (20)

67Ga 3.2617 d (5)

184.576 (10)




21.410 (10)

2.460 (10)

16.64 (12)

4.56 (24)

66Ga 9.49 h (3) 1039.220 (3) 37.0 (20)
57Ni 35.60 h (6)

127.167 (3)

1377.63 (3)

16.7 (5)

81.7 (24)

22Na 2.6027 y (10) 1274.537 (7) 99.941 (14)


The irradiation runs were performed at the ARRONAX facility in the energy range 35-70 MeV, using the stacked-foils technique, obtaining several experimental data on each run through the simultaneous bombardment of a set of thin foils. A typical stacked-foils target was made by two identical patterns composed by an enriched 68Zn target foil and a monitor foil, used to measure the effective beam flux by considering a reference reaction recommended by IAEA [6]. Some aluminium foils (500 μm-1 mm thick) were used to separate the two patterns, decrease the proton beam energy and catch possible recoil atoms. Considering that 61Cu was not produced into 68Zn targets in case of low energy proton beams (threshold energy ETHR=35.97 MeV), a natural copper foil (20 μm thick) was added to the stacked-target and later used in the chemical process as source of 61Cuviathe natCu(p,x) reaction. On the contrary 66Ga, the tracer radionuclide of gallium isotopes, was always directly produced into 68Zn targets in the energy range investigated (ETHR=23.55 MeV).Stacked-foils targets were made using high purity foils (>99%, Goodfellow Cambridge Ltd., UK). The 68Zn target foils were obtained by electrodeposition of enriched 68Zn metallic powder purchased by CHEMGAS (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) with isotopic composition 64Zn (0.18%), 66Zn (0.13%), 67Zn (0.55%),68Zn (98.78%), 70Zn (0.36%); a natural high-purity silver foil (25 µm thick) was used as support (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Photograph of a typical target foil with enriched 68Zn deposit on a silver support. 

Electroplated target foils were inserted into the stacked-target and irradiated by the proton beam provided by the ARRONAX cyclotron with energy ranging from 35 MeV to 70 MeV. A typical irradiation run had a duration of 1.5 hours with a constant current of about 100-230 nA, monitored during the bombardment by using an instrumented beam dump. After 14 hours of cooling time, a radiochemical procedure was applied to irradiated targets in order to separate gallium from copper isotopes. This procedure was based on a Cu-resin (purchased to TrisKem International, France) able to selectively retain and release copper atoms under specific conditions. Further details of the radiochemical procedure can be found in [7]. The yield of chemical processing was monitored for all target foils, by measuring the activities of the tracer radionuclides, before and after the radiochemical procedure. All samples were measured with the same high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector (10% relative efficiency, FWHM 1.0 keV at 122 keV, Canberra GC1020), previously calibrated with standard liquid source.Two sample-detector positions (at 19 cm distance and at contact) were used to always keep the dead time below 10%.The well-known activation formula was used to calculate the cross section values, by considering the monitor reactions natNi(p,x)57Ni and natAl(p,x)22Na recommended by IAEA [6], respectively for energies lower and higher than 50 MeV.The isotopic purity of the 68Zn deposit and the chemical purity of reference foils were taken into account in the cross section calculation; results of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu, 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga reactions referred to 100% enriched 68Zn target. The uncertainty of the cross section values were evaluated in a quadratic form, considering individual uncertainties: reference cross section (≤ 10%), measured activity (≤ 8%), target thickess and decay data values (1%).


The radiochemical yield for copper and gallium isotopes was precisely determined by using the tracer radionuclide activities (61Cu and 66Ga). The efficiency of the separation procedure was calculated measuring the presence of 61Cu (and thus copper isotopes) into the gallium solution and viceversa. It was found thatthe 66Ga activity (and thus 67Ga activity) into the copper solution was about 0.2% of its initial activity (i.e.before the chemical process), while 61Cu activity (and thus 67Cu) into the gallium solution was always below the Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA), corresponding to less than 1% of 61Cu initial activity.These results showed a high yield of separation Cu/Ga isotopes, assuring a proper measurement of 67Cu and 67Ga activity values.

Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 reported the results obtained in this work respectively for the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu, 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga and 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga nuclear reactions.Literature data available from EXFOR database [5] were reported on figures without error bars for clarity; TALYS estimations, obtained by using both default (Talys) and new set of models (Talys*) [7,8], were also shown as dashed and dotted lines (Figure 2-4).

Fig. 2 Cross section of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu nuclear reaction 

Figure 2 reported the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu cross section measured in this work in the energy range 35-70 MeV, compared with literature [5] and TALYS estimations. The new set of data obtained in this work was in good agreement with previous measurements, in particular with the latest ones. Szelecsényi et al. (2009) measured the cross section from the threshold energy up to 40 MeV, describing the rising region of the nuclear reaction. Bonardi et al. (2005) irradiated a natural zinc target: their data in Figure 2 were rescaled to a 100% enriched 68Zn material, thus including the additional contribution of (p,x) reactions on 70Zn (0.61% natural abundance). Stoll et al. (2002) investigated the energy range 25-71 MeV, obtaining two series of values in the energy range 35-45 MeV. It has to be noted that data obtained by Levkovskij et al. (1991) were rescaled by an appropriate factor to correct the use of an over-estimated reference reaction, as reported in EXFOR database [5]. Previous data were considered not reliable, due to the large discrepancy with other authors; in particular, results by McGee et al. (1970) did not reproduce the expected shape of the excitation function even after the adjustment needed to account for up-to-date IAEA monitor data.

Fig. 3 Cross section of the 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga nuclear reaction 

Figure 3 showed the measurements of the 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga cross sections obtained in this work, also reporting literature data and estimations performed with TALYS software and the two set of models. The 68Zn(p,2n)67Ga nuclear reaction has an intense peak value (about 700 mbarn) at energies lower than 25 MeV (Figure 3). Data measured in this work described the decreasing part of the reaction: there is an excellent agreement with values obtained by Szelecsényi et al. (2005) in the entire energy range (35-70 MeV) and, in the energy region 35-45 MeV, with data by Hermanne et al. (1991). The same author repeated the measurement up to 33 MeV, confirming previous results. The only discrepancy at high energy was the data set by Stoll et al. (2002), that seemed to almost double the cross section values in the entire energy range (38-71 MeV).

Fig. 4 Cross section of the 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga nuclear reaction 

Figure 4 reported the measurements of the 68Zn(p,3n)66Ga cross section: as in case of 67Ga, results obtained in this work described the decreasing part of the nuclear reaction. There was an excellent agreement with latest values by Szelecsényi et al. (2005) in the entire energy range (35-70 MeV).Measurements by Stoll et al. (2002) were in good agreement for energies higher than 43 MeV, while at lower energies these previous data seemed to underestimate the nuclear reaction. Hermanne et al. (1991) measured a very high peak value (around 290 mb at 34 MeV), but the same authors repeated the experiment in 1999 and these later data are in good agreement with results obtained in this work.


Considering the recent availability of compact cyclotrons, able to provide intense proton beams of high energy, the production yield of 67Cu was also calculated. The yield value of 67Cu in the energy range 70-35 MeV, based on the experimental data of the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu cross section obtained in this work, is 24.25 MBq/µAh.This value is 15% lower than the IAEA estimation in the same energy region (28.46 MBq/µAh) [9]. In order to maximize the production of the radionuclide of interest it is possible to extend the calculation to a larger energy range. In view of the good agreement of our data for the 68Zn(p,2p)67Cu cross section with the results obtained by using TALYS code with the set of models proposed by [8], it is possible to extend the yield calculation in the energy range 70-19 MeV, i.e. the starting energy of the nuclear reaction of interest.This thick target yield value is 25.95 MBq/µAh, i.e.the increase is 7% in respect of the yield in the energy range 70-35 MeV. On the other hand the increase of the thickness of the target material needed is around 28%. Considering the cost of the enriched material and the final use of 67Cu radionuclide (i.e. contaminant co-production), the best energy range should be carefully evaluated, taking into account also the target design and its cooling system.


In this work the new cross section data of the 68Zn(p,x)67Cu, 67Ga, 66Ga reactions were presented. Experiments were performed at the ARRONAX facility by using 70 MeV proton cyclotron, enriched 68Zn and applying a simple chemical procedure to accurately measure 67Cu and 67Ga activity values by γ-spectrometry. The separation yield was determined during each separation process by using 61Cu and 66Ga radionuclides as tracer isotopes, respectively for copper and gallium elements. Reference reactions proposed by IAEA were used to monitor beam flux and calculate the cross sections. The new set of data obtained in this work for all the radionuclides of interest were in good agreement with the latest measurements. The TALYS software was used to estimate the nuclear reaction of interest: in case of the 68Zn(p,2n)67Cu the new set of models suitably described data obtained in this work but TALYS predictions of the (p,2n) and (p,3n) reactions presented some discrepancies with experimental values in the peak energy region; this fact highlighted the need of further work on nuclear models for specific reactions and energy range of interest.

Based on the data obtained in this work the yield of 67Cu was calculated for thick targets and it was found to be 15% lower than the IAEA estimation in the same energy region (70-35 MeV); this difference is relevant in order to plan a sustainable production of67Cu for medical purpose. Specific evaluations about the optimal irradiation conditions, taking into account the cost of enriched target material and the specific final use of 67Cu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals, are recommended. In order to plan a sustainable production of 67Cu for preclinical and clinical use it is important also to consider the recovery and reuse of irradiated material through definite radiochemical procedures.


Authors would thank Prof. Mauro Gambaccini (University of Ferrara) for the support during the PhD thesis of G. Pupillo, Prof. Adriano Duatti (University of Ferrara), Prof. Giovanni Fiorentini (University of Ferrara and INFN-LNL) and Dott. Carlos Rossi Alvarez (INFN-LNL) for many helpful suggestions and comments on this topic. This work was promoted by the University of Ferrara with a financial support for the research activities (Progetto RaMe, Fondi 5 x 1000 Anno 2009) and by the European Commission through an Erasmus Placement fund that G. Pupillo spent at ARRONAX facility. The ARRONAX cyclotron is a project promoted by the Regional Council of Pays de la Loire financed by local authorities, the French government and the European Union. This work has been, in part, supported by a grant from the French National Agency for Research called “Investissements d’Avenir”, Equipex Arronax-Plus No. ANR-11-EQPX-0004 and Labex No. ANR- 11-LABX-0018-01.


1.  [1] IAEA. Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals Labelled with New Emerging Radionuclides (671.  Cu, 1861.  Re, 471.  Sc). Vienna: IAEA, 2016. [ Links ]

2.  [2] National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC). Information extracted from the NuDat2 Database. 2016. Disponible en:  . [ Links ]

3.  [3] MAGGIORE M, CAMPO D, ANTONINI P, LOMBARDIET A, et. al. SPES: A new cyclotron-based facility for research and applications with high-intensity beams. Modern Physics Letters A. 2017; 32(17): 1740010. doi: 10.1142/S0217732317400107. [ Links ]

4.  [4] HADDAD F, FERRER L, GUERTIN A, CARLIER T, et. al. ARRONAX, a high-energy and high-intensity cyclotron for nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 35(7): 1377-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0802-5. [ Links ]

5.  [5] Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR). Information Extracted from the Database. 2016. Disponible en:  [ Links ]

6.  [6] IAEA. Charged particle cross section database for medical radioisotope production: diagnostic radioisotopes and monitor reactions. IAEA-TECDOC-1211. Vienna: IAEA, 2001. Disponible en:  . [ Links ]

7.  [7] PUPILLO G, SOUNALET T, MICHEL N, MOU L, et. al. New production cross section for the theranostic radionuclide 677.  Cu. Nuclear Inst. and Meth Phys Res B. 2018; 415(15): 41-47. doi:  [ Links ]

8.  [8] DUCHEMIN C, GUERTIN A , HADDAD F , MICHEL N , et. al. Production of medical isotopes from a thorium target irradiated by light charged particles up to 70 MeV. Phys Med & Biol. 2015; 60(3): 931-946. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/931. [ Links ]

9.  [9] IAEA. Bibliography of experimental data on 689.  Zn(p,2p)679.  Cu. Vienna, IAEA. Disponible en:  [ Links ]

Received: February 13, 2018; Accepted: May 29, 2018

Creative Commons License